Cargando…
The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers
Overlapping histological features between benign and malignant lesions and a lack of firm diagnostic criteria for malignancy result in high rates of inter-observer variation in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. We aimed to investigate the differential expression of five miRNAs (21, 200c, 204, 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02817-5 |
_version_ | 1783551166188093440 |
---|---|
author | Quiohilag, Katherine Caie, Peter Oniscu, Anca Brenn, Thomas Harrison, David |
author_facet | Quiohilag, Katherine Caie, Peter Oniscu, Anca Brenn, Thomas Harrison, David |
author_sort | Quiohilag, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Overlapping histological features between benign and malignant lesions and a lack of firm diagnostic criteria for malignancy result in high rates of inter-observer variation in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. We aimed to investigate the differential expression of five miRNAs (21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211) in benign naevi (n = 42), dysplastic naevi (n = 41), melanoma in situ (n = 42), and melanoma (n = 42) and evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers of melanocytic lesions. Real-time PCR showed differential miRNA expression profiles between benign naevi; dysplastic naevi and melanoma in situ; and invasive melanoma. We applied a random forest machine learning algorithm to classify cases based on their miRNA expression profiles, which resulted in a ROC curve analysis of 0.99 for malignant melanoma and greater than 0.9 for all other groups. This indicates an overall very high accuracy of our panel of miRNAs as a diagnostic biomarker of benign, dysplastic, and malignant melanocytic lesions. However, the impact of variable lesion percentage and spatial expression patterns of miRNAs on these real-time PCR results was also considered. In situ hybridisation confirmed the expression of miRNA 21 and 211 in melanocytes, while demonstrating expression of miRNA 205 only in keratinocytes, thus calling into question its value as a biomarker of melanocytic lesions. In conclusion, we have validated some miRNAs, including miRNA 21 and 211, as potential diagnostic biomarkers of benign, dysplastic, and malignant melanocytic lesions. However, we also highlight the crucial importance of considering tissue morphology and spatial expression patterns when using molecular techniques for the discovery and validation of new biomarkers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00428-020-02817-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7320036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73200362020-07-01 The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers Quiohilag, Katherine Caie, Peter Oniscu, Anca Brenn, Thomas Harrison, David Virchows Arch Original Article Overlapping histological features between benign and malignant lesions and a lack of firm diagnostic criteria for malignancy result in high rates of inter-observer variation in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. We aimed to investigate the differential expression of five miRNAs (21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211) in benign naevi (n = 42), dysplastic naevi (n = 41), melanoma in situ (n = 42), and melanoma (n = 42) and evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers of melanocytic lesions. Real-time PCR showed differential miRNA expression profiles between benign naevi; dysplastic naevi and melanoma in situ; and invasive melanoma. We applied a random forest machine learning algorithm to classify cases based on their miRNA expression profiles, which resulted in a ROC curve analysis of 0.99 for malignant melanoma and greater than 0.9 for all other groups. This indicates an overall very high accuracy of our panel of miRNAs as a diagnostic biomarker of benign, dysplastic, and malignant melanocytic lesions. However, the impact of variable lesion percentage and spatial expression patterns of miRNAs on these real-time PCR results was also considered. In situ hybridisation confirmed the expression of miRNA 21 and 211 in melanocytes, while demonstrating expression of miRNA 205 only in keratinocytes, thus calling into question its value as a biomarker of melanocytic lesions. In conclusion, we have validated some miRNAs, including miRNA 21 and 211, as potential diagnostic biomarkers of benign, dysplastic, and malignant melanocytic lesions. However, we also highlight the crucial importance of considering tissue morphology and spatial expression patterns when using molecular techniques for the discovery and validation of new biomarkers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00428-020-02817-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7320036/ /pubmed/32388720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02817-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Quiohilag, Katherine Caie, Peter Oniscu, Anca Brenn, Thomas Harrison, David The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
title | The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
title_full | The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
title_fullStr | The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
title_short | The differential expression of micro-RNAs 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
title_sort | differential expression of micro-rnas 21, 200c, 204, 205, and 211 in benign, dysplastic and malignant melanocytic lesions and critical evaluation of their role as diagnostic biomarkers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02817-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quiohilagkatherine thedifferentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT caiepeter thedifferentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT oniscuanca thedifferentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT brennthomas thedifferentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT harrisondavid thedifferentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT quiohilagkatherine differentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT caiepeter differentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT oniscuanca differentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT brennthomas differentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers AT harrisondavid differentialexpressionofmicrornas21200c204205and211inbenigndysplasticandmalignantmelanocyticlesionsandcriticalevaluationoftheirroleasdiagnosticbiomarkers |