Cargando…

Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The microstructure of the subchondral trabecular bone, including the composition and distribution of plates and rods, has an important influence on the disease progression and mechanical properties of osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP). We aimed to determine whether diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Zihao, Chu, Linyang, Liu, Xuqiang, Han, Xuequan, Zhang, Kai, Yan, Mengning, Li, Xiaofeng, Yu, Zhifeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.006
_version_ 1783551196214067200
author He, Zihao
Chu, Linyang
Liu, Xuqiang
Han, Xuequan
Zhang, Kai
Yan, Mengning
Li, Xiaofeng
Yu, Zhifeng
author_facet He, Zihao
Chu, Linyang
Liu, Xuqiang
Han, Xuequan
Zhang, Kai
Yan, Mengning
Li, Xiaofeng
Yu, Zhifeng
author_sort He, Zihao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The microstructure of the subchondral trabecular bone, including the composition and distribution of plates and rods, has an important influence on the disease progression and mechanical properties of osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP). We aimed to determine whether differences in plates and rods influence the variations in the quantities and qualities of the subchondral trabecular bone between OA and OP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight femoral head samples [OA, n = 13; OP, n = 17; normal control (NC), n = 8] were collected from male patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. They were scanned using microcomputed tomography, and subchondral trabecular structures were analysed using individual trabecular segmentation. Micro-finite element analysis (μFEA) was applied to assess the mechanical property of the trabecular bone. Cartilage changes were evaluated by using histological assessment. Analysis of variance was used to compare intergroup differences in structural and mechanical properties and cartilage degradation. Pearson analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the trabecula microstructure and biomechanical properties. RESULTS: Compared with the OP and NC group, there was serious cartilage damage in the OA group. With respect to the microstructure results, the OA group had the highest plate and rod trabecular microstructures including number and junction density among the three groups. For the mechanical properties detected via μFEA, the OA group had higher stiffness and failure load than did the OP group. Pearson analysis revealed that compared with OP, OA had a higher number of microstructure parameters (e.g., rod bone volume fraction and rod trabecular number) that were positively correlated with its mechanical property. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OP, the OA subchondral bone has both increased plate and rod microarchitecture and has more microstructures positively related with its mechanical property. These differences may help explain the variation in mechanical properties between these bone diseases. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Our findings suggested that changes in the plates and rods of the subchondral trabecular bone play a critical role in OA and OP progression and that the improvement of the subchondral trabecular bone may be a promising treatment approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7320230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73202302020-07-07 Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis He, Zihao Chu, Linyang Liu, Xuqiang Han, Xuequan Zhang, Kai Yan, Mengning Li, Xiaofeng Yu, Zhifeng J Orthop Translat Original Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The microstructure of the subchondral trabecular bone, including the composition and distribution of plates and rods, has an important influence on the disease progression and mechanical properties of osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP). We aimed to determine whether differences in plates and rods influence the variations in the quantities and qualities of the subchondral trabecular bone between OA and OP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight femoral head samples [OA, n = 13; OP, n = 17; normal control (NC), n = 8] were collected from male patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. They were scanned using microcomputed tomography, and subchondral trabecular structures were analysed using individual trabecular segmentation. Micro-finite element analysis (μFEA) was applied to assess the mechanical property of the trabecular bone. Cartilage changes were evaluated by using histological assessment. Analysis of variance was used to compare intergroup differences in structural and mechanical properties and cartilage degradation. Pearson analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the trabecula microstructure and biomechanical properties. RESULTS: Compared with the OP and NC group, there was serious cartilage damage in the OA group. With respect to the microstructure results, the OA group had the highest plate and rod trabecular microstructures including number and junction density among the three groups. For the mechanical properties detected via μFEA, the OA group had higher stiffness and failure load than did the OP group. Pearson analysis revealed that compared with OP, OA had a higher number of microstructure parameters (e.g., rod bone volume fraction and rod trabecular number) that were positively correlated with its mechanical property. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OP, the OA subchondral bone has both increased plate and rod microarchitecture and has more microstructures positively related with its mechanical property. These differences may help explain the variation in mechanical properties between these bone diseases. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: Our findings suggested that changes in the plates and rods of the subchondral trabecular bone play a critical role in OA and OP progression and that the improvement of the subchondral trabecular bone may be a promising treatment approach. Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7320230/ /pubmed/32642427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.006 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
He, Zihao
Chu, Linyang
Liu, Xuqiang
Han, Xuequan
Zhang, Kai
Yan, Mengning
Li, Xiaofeng
Yu, Zhifeng
Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
title Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
title_full Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
title_fullStr Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
title_short Differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
title_sort differences in subchondral trabecular bone microstructure and finite element analysis-based biomechanical properties between osteoporosis and osteoarthritis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT hezihao differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT chulinyang differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT liuxuqiang differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT hanxuequan differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT zhangkai differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT yanmengning differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT lixiaofeng differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis
AT yuzhifeng differencesinsubchondraltrabecularbonemicrostructureandfiniteelementanalysisbasedbiomechanicalpropertiesbetweenosteoporosisandosteoarthritis