Cargando…
Cardiac injury, ARDS and COVID-19 meta-analysis validity – Correspondence in response to Santoso et al.
Autores principales: | Carver, Catherine, Jones, Nicholas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.028 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correspondence on Lovell et al.: response to Bornelöv et al.
por: Lovell, Peter V., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Correspondence: Examination of the Melatonin Hypothesis: Graham et al.'s Response
por: Graham, C
Publicado: (2002) -
Correspondence: PCB-Induced Impairments in Older Adults:Schantz et al.'s Response
por: Schantz, S
Publicado: (2002) -
Response to Huang et al. “Herpesviridae reactivation for poor outcome in ARDS patients with ECMO: criminal or witness?”
por: Hraiech, Sami, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Response to Correspondence: Baricitinib: Impact on Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) Coagulopathy? Jorgensen et al
por: Titanji, Boghuma K, et al.
Publicado: (2020)