Cargando…

Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador

In Ecuador, the net energy contribution of biofuels is unknown or unnoticed. To address this issue, we determined the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for bioethanol and biodiesel. The selection of raw materials relied on their productive capacity, export and import records, and historical yields....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiriboga, Gonzalo, De La Rosa, Andrés, Molina, Camila, Velarde, Stefany, Carvajal C, Ghem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04213
_version_ 1783551345312137216
author Chiriboga, Gonzalo
De La Rosa, Andrés
Molina, Camila
Velarde, Stefany
Carvajal C, Ghem
author_facet Chiriboga, Gonzalo
De La Rosa, Andrés
Molina, Camila
Velarde, Stefany
Carvajal C, Ghem
author_sort Chiriboga, Gonzalo
collection PubMed
description In Ecuador, the net energy contribution of biofuels is unknown or unnoticed. To address this issue, we determined the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for bioethanol and biodiesel. The selection of raw materials relied on their productive capacity, export and import records, and historical yields. Consequently, the scope included three raw materials for ethanol (sugar cane, corn, and forest residues) and four for biodiesel (African palm, pinion, bovine fat, and swine fat). Using a method based on the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of each biofuel, we assessed the entire production chain through statistical processing of primary and secondary information. Then we calculated the calorific values in the laboratory, compared energy inputs/outputs, and finally obtained the energetic returns. EROIs for bioethanol were: 1.797 for sugarcane, 1.040 for corn, and 0.739 for wood. The results for biodiesel were: 3.052 for African palm, 2.743 for pinion, 2.187 for bovine fat, and 2.891 for swine fat. These values suggest feasibility only for sugarcane in the case of ethanol. In contrast, biodiesel has better prospects because all the feedstocks analyzed had EROIs higher than two. Nevertheless, biodiesel is not available for trading in Ecuador because energy policy has overlooked systems based on higher energy return. Future studies should consider more comprehensive variables such as climate change, land use, and water management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7320919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73209192020-06-29 Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador Chiriboga, Gonzalo De La Rosa, Andrés Molina, Camila Velarde, Stefany Carvajal C, Ghem Heliyon Article In Ecuador, the net energy contribution of biofuels is unknown or unnoticed. To address this issue, we determined the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for bioethanol and biodiesel. The selection of raw materials relied on their productive capacity, export and import records, and historical yields. Consequently, the scope included three raw materials for ethanol (sugar cane, corn, and forest residues) and four for biodiesel (African palm, pinion, bovine fat, and swine fat). Using a method based on the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of each biofuel, we assessed the entire production chain through statistical processing of primary and secondary information. Then we calculated the calorific values in the laboratory, compared energy inputs/outputs, and finally obtained the energetic returns. EROIs for bioethanol were: 1.797 for sugarcane, 1.040 for corn, and 0.739 for wood. The results for biodiesel were: 3.052 for African palm, 2.743 for pinion, 2.187 for bovine fat, and 2.891 for swine fat. These values suggest feasibility only for sugarcane in the case of ethanol. In contrast, biodiesel has better prospects because all the feedstocks analyzed had EROIs higher than two. Nevertheless, biodiesel is not available for trading in Ecuador because energy policy has overlooked systems based on higher energy return. Future studies should consider more comprehensive variables such as climate change, land use, and water management. Elsevier 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7320919/ /pubmed/32632381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04213 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chiriboga, Gonzalo
De La Rosa, Andrés
Molina, Camila
Velarde, Stefany
Carvajal C, Ghem
Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
title Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
title_full Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
title_fullStr Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
title_short Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
title_sort energy return on investment (eroi) and life cycle analysis (lca) of biofuels in ecuador
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04213
work_keys_str_mv AT chiribogagonzalo energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador
AT delarosaandres energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador
AT molinacamila energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador
AT velardestefany energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador
AT carvajalcghem energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador