Cargando…
Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador
In Ecuador, the net energy contribution of biofuels is unknown or unnoticed. To address this issue, we determined the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for bioethanol and biodiesel. The selection of raw materials relied on their productive capacity, export and import records, and historical yields....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04213 |
_version_ | 1783551345312137216 |
---|---|
author | Chiriboga, Gonzalo De La Rosa, Andrés Molina, Camila Velarde, Stefany Carvajal C, Ghem |
author_facet | Chiriboga, Gonzalo De La Rosa, Andrés Molina, Camila Velarde, Stefany Carvajal C, Ghem |
author_sort | Chiriboga, Gonzalo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Ecuador, the net energy contribution of biofuels is unknown or unnoticed. To address this issue, we determined the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for bioethanol and biodiesel. The selection of raw materials relied on their productive capacity, export and import records, and historical yields. Consequently, the scope included three raw materials for ethanol (sugar cane, corn, and forest residues) and four for biodiesel (African palm, pinion, bovine fat, and swine fat). Using a method based on the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of each biofuel, we assessed the entire production chain through statistical processing of primary and secondary information. Then we calculated the calorific values in the laboratory, compared energy inputs/outputs, and finally obtained the energetic returns. EROIs for bioethanol were: 1.797 for sugarcane, 1.040 for corn, and 0.739 for wood. The results for biodiesel were: 3.052 for African palm, 2.743 for pinion, 2.187 for bovine fat, and 2.891 for swine fat. These values suggest feasibility only for sugarcane in the case of ethanol. In contrast, biodiesel has better prospects because all the feedstocks analyzed had EROIs higher than two. Nevertheless, biodiesel is not available for trading in Ecuador because energy policy has overlooked systems based on higher energy return. Future studies should consider more comprehensive variables such as climate change, land use, and water management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7320919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73209192020-06-29 Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador Chiriboga, Gonzalo De La Rosa, Andrés Molina, Camila Velarde, Stefany Carvajal C, Ghem Heliyon Article In Ecuador, the net energy contribution of biofuels is unknown or unnoticed. To address this issue, we determined the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for bioethanol and biodiesel. The selection of raw materials relied on their productive capacity, export and import records, and historical yields. Consequently, the scope included three raw materials for ethanol (sugar cane, corn, and forest residues) and four for biodiesel (African palm, pinion, bovine fat, and swine fat). Using a method based on the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of each biofuel, we assessed the entire production chain through statistical processing of primary and secondary information. Then we calculated the calorific values in the laboratory, compared energy inputs/outputs, and finally obtained the energetic returns. EROIs for bioethanol were: 1.797 for sugarcane, 1.040 for corn, and 0.739 for wood. The results for biodiesel were: 3.052 for African palm, 2.743 for pinion, 2.187 for bovine fat, and 2.891 for swine fat. These values suggest feasibility only for sugarcane in the case of ethanol. In contrast, biodiesel has better prospects because all the feedstocks analyzed had EROIs higher than two. Nevertheless, biodiesel is not available for trading in Ecuador because energy policy has overlooked systems based on higher energy return. Future studies should consider more comprehensive variables such as climate change, land use, and water management. Elsevier 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7320919/ /pubmed/32632381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04213 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chiriboga, Gonzalo De La Rosa, Andrés Molina, Camila Velarde, Stefany Carvajal C, Ghem Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador |
title | Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador |
title_full | Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador |
title_fullStr | Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador |
title_full_unstemmed | Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador |
title_short | Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of biofuels in Ecuador |
title_sort | energy return on investment (eroi) and life cycle analysis (lca) of biofuels in ecuador |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7320919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiribogagonzalo energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador AT delarosaandres energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador AT molinacamila energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador AT velardestefany energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador AT carvajalcghem energyreturnoninvestmenteroiandlifecycleanalysislcaofbiofuelsinecuador |