Cargando…

A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media

The development of solid materials that deliver nitric oxide (NO) are of interest for several therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, due to NO’s reactive nature, rapid diffusion and short half-life, reporting their NO delivery characteristics is rather complex. The full knowledge of this parameter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: V. Pinto, Rosana, Antunes, Fernando, Pires, João, Silva-Herdade, Ana, Pinto, Moisés L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112580
_version_ 1783551451355676672
author V. Pinto, Rosana
Antunes, Fernando
Pires, João
Silva-Herdade, Ana
Pinto, Moisés L.
author_facet V. Pinto, Rosana
Antunes, Fernando
Pires, João
Silva-Herdade, Ana
Pinto, Moisés L.
author_sort V. Pinto, Rosana
collection PubMed
description The development of solid materials that deliver nitric oxide (NO) are of interest for several therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, due to NO’s reactive nature, rapid diffusion and short half-life, reporting their NO delivery characteristics is rather complex. The full knowledge of this parameter is fundamental to discuss the therapeutic utility of these materials, and thus, the NO quantification strategy must be carefully considered according to the NO-releasing scaffold type, to the expected NO-releasing amounts and to the medium of quantification. In this work, we explore and discuss three different ways of quantifying the release of NO in different biological fluids: haemoglobin assay, Griess assay and NO electrochemical detection. For these measurements, different porous materials, namely zeolites and titanosilicates were used as models for NO-releasing platforms. The oxyhaemoglobin assay offers great sensitivity (nanomolar levels), but it is only possible to monitor the NO release while oxyhaemoglobin is not fully converted. On the other hand, Griess assay has low sensitivity in complex biological media, namely in blood, and interferences with media make NO measurements questionable. Nevertheless, this method can measure micromolar amounts of NO and may be useful for an initial screening for long-term release performance. The electrochemical sensor enabled real-time measurements in a variety of biological settings. However, measured NO is critically low in oxygenated and complex media, giving transient signals, which makes long-term quantification impossible. Despite the disadvantages of each method, the combination of all the results provided a more comprehensive NO release profile for these materials, which will help to determine which formulations are most promising for specific therapeutic applications. This study highlights the importance of using appropriate NO quantification tools to provide accurate reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7321377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73213772020-06-29 A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media V. Pinto, Rosana Antunes, Fernando Pires, João Silva-Herdade, Ana Pinto, Moisés L. Molecules Article The development of solid materials that deliver nitric oxide (NO) are of interest for several therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, due to NO’s reactive nature, rapid diffusion and short half-life, reporting their NO delivery characteristics is rather complex. The full knowledge of this parameter is fundamental to discuss the therapeutic utility of these materials, and thus, the NO quantification strategy must be carefully considered according to the NO-releasing scaffold type, to the expected NO-releasing amounts and to the medium of quantification. In this work, we explore and discuss three different ways of quantifying the release of NO in different biological fluids: haemoglobin assay, Griess assay and NO electrochemical detection. For these measurements, different porous materials, namely zeolites and titanosilicates were used as models for NO-releasing platforms. The oxyhaemoglobin assay offers great sensitivity (nanomolar levels), but it is only possible to monitor the NO release while oxyhaemoglobin is not fully converted. On the other hand, Griess assay has low sensitivity in complex biological media, namely in blood, and interferences with media make NO measurements questionable. Nevertheless, this method can measure micromolar amounts of NO and may be useful for an initial screening for long-term release performance. The electrochemical sensor enabled real-time measurements in a variety of biological settings. However, measured NO is critically low in oxygenated and complex media, giving transient signals, which makes long-term quantification impossible. Despite the disadvantages of each method, the combination of all the results provided a more comprehensive NO release profile for these materials, which will help to determine which formulations are most promising for specific therapeutic applications. This study highlights the importance of using appropriate NO quantification tools to provide accurate reports. MDPI 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7321377/ /pubmed/32498254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112580 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
V. Pinto, Rosana
Antunes, Fernando
Pires, João
Silva-Herdade, Ana
Pinto, Moisés L.
A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
title A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
title_full A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
title_fullStr A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
title_short A Comparison of Different Approaches to Quantify Nitric Oxide Release from NO-Releasing Materials in Relevant Biological Media
title_sort comparison of different approaches to quantify nitric oxide release from no-releasing materials in relevant biological media
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112580
work_keys_str_mv AT vpintorosana acomparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT antunesfernando acomparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT piresjoao acomparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT silvaherdadeana acomparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT pintomoisesl acomparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT vpintorosana comparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT antunesfernando comparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT piresjoao comparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT silvaherdadeana comparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia
AT pintomoisesl comparisonofdifferentapproachestoquantifynitricoxidereleasefromnoreleasingmaterialsinrelevantbiologicalmedia