Cargando…

The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery

BACKGROUND: Mandibular third molar removal is the most common surgical procedure encountered in oral and maxillofacial clinics. It also presents the greatest challenges and controversies for surgeons when surgical removal is considered. Furthermore, diverse anesthesia results and success rates are a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayphiboun, Phouthala, Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant, Mahardawi, Basel, Pairuchvej, Verasak, Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash, Wongsirichat, Natthamet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617408
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.3.137
_version_ 1783551537894653952
author Sayphiboun, Phouthala
Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant
Mahardawi, Basel
Pairuchvej, Verasak
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
Wongsirichat, Natthamet
author_facet Sayphiboun, Phouthala
Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant
Mahardawi, Basel
Pairuchvej, Verasak
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
Wongsirichat, Natthamet
author_sort Sayphiboun, Phouthala
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mandibular third molar removal is the most common surgical procedure encountered in oral and maxillofacial clinics. It also presents the greatest challenges and controversies for surgeons when surgical removal is considered. Furthermore, diverse anesthesia results and success rates are achieved after using the same concentrations of different solutions or the same amounts of local anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficiency of using double-cartridge (3.4 ml) 4% lidocaine (high concentration) and 4% articaine with a 1:100000 epinephrine infiltration in the retromolar region for impacted lower third molar surgery. METHODS: This double-blind study included 30 patients with symmetrically impacted lower third molars. The patients were randomly selected to receive 4% articaine on one side and 4% lidocaine on the other, as a local anesthetic for third molar surgery. The onset, duration of soft-tissue numbness, pulpal sensitivity, amount of additional local anesthetic needed, pain score during the surgical procedure, and duration of the operation were recorded. RESULTS: The results of this research indicate that 86.7% of the operations in the 4% articaine group and 83.3% of those in the 4% lidocaine group were successful. Furthermore, the outcomes in both groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Numbness onset occurred faster in the articaine group than it did in the lidocaine group. However, the duration of soft-tissue anesthesia and pain scores recorded immediately postoperatively were similar. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that 4% lidocaine and 4% articaine had a similar infiltration efficacy in the retromolar region and both local anesthetics are adequate for impacted lower third molar surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the two local anesthetics regarding pain control and the duration of soft-tissue numbness during the procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7321737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73217372020-07-01 The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery Sayphiboun, Phouthala Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant Mahardawi, Basel Pairuchvej, Verasak Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash Wongsirichat, Natthamet J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Mandibular third molar removal is the most common surgical procedure encountered in oral and maxillofacial clinics. It also presents the greatest challenges and controversies for surgeons when surgical removal is considered. Furthermore, diverse anesthesia results and success rates are achieved after using the same concentrations of different solutions or the same amounts of local anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficiency of using double-cartridge (3.4 ml) 4% lidocaine (high concentration) and 4% articaine with a 1:100000 epinephrine infiltration in the retromolar region for impacted lower third molar surgery. METHODS: This double-blind study included 30 patients with symmetrically impacted lower third molars. The patients were randomly selected to receive 4% articaine on one side and 4% lidocaine on the other, as a local anesthetic for third molar surgery. The onset, duration of soft-tissue numbness, pulpal sensitivity, amount of additional local anesthetic needed, pain score during the surgical procedure, and duration of the operation were recorded. RESULTS: The results of this research indicate that 86.7% of the operations in the 4% articaine group and 83.3% of those in the 4% lidocaine group were successful. Furthermore, the outcomes in both groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Numbness onset occurred faster in the articaine group than it did in the lidocaine group. However, the duration of soft-tissue anesthesia and pain scores recorded immediately postoperatively were similar. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that 4% lidocaine and 4% articaine had a similar infiltration efficacy in the retromolar region and both local anesthetics are adequate for impacted lower third molar surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the two local anesthetics regarding pain control and the duration of soft-tissue numbness during the procedure. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020-06 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7321737/ /pubmed/32617408 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.3.137 Text en Copyright © 2020 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sayphiboun, Phouthala
Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant
Mahardawi, Basel
Pairuchvej, Verasak
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
Wongsirichat, Natthamet
The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
title The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
title_full The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
title_fullStr The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
title_full_unstemmed The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
title_short The anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
title_sort anesthetic efficiency of retromolar infiltrations with two local anesthetic solutions of the same concentration in lower third molar surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617408
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.3.137
work_keys_str_mv AT sayphibounphouthala theanestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT boonsirisethkiatanant theanestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT mahardawibasel theanestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT pairuchvejverasak theanestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT bhattaraibishwaprakash theanestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT wongsirichatnatthamet theanestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT sayphibounphouthala anestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT boonsirisethkiatanant anestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT mahardawibasel anestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT pairuchvejverasak anestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT bhattaraibishwaprakash anestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery
AT wongsirichatnatthamet anestheticefficiencyofretromolarinfiltrationswithtwolocalanestheticsolutionsofthesameconcentrationinlowerthirdmolarsurgery