Cargando…
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control
Divergent thinking (DT) as one component of creativity is the ability to search for multiple solutions to a single problem and is reliably tested with the Alternative Uses Task (AUT). DT depends on activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a prefrontal region that has also been associated with i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y |
_version_ | 1783551557577474048 |
---|---|
author | Khalil, Radwa Karim, Ahmed A. Kondinska, Angela Godde, Ben |
author_facet | Khalil, Radwa Karim, Ahmed A. Kondinska, Angela Godde, Ben |
author_sort | Khalil, Radwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Divergent thinking (DT) as one component of creativity is the ability to search for multiple solutions to a single problem and is reliably tested with the Alternative Uses Task (AUT). DT depends on activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a prefrontal region that has also been associated with inhibitory control (IC). Experimentally manipulating IC through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) led to alterations in DT. Here, we aimed at further examining such potential mediating effects of IC on DT (measured as flexibility, fluency, and originality in the AUT) by modulating IC tDCS. Participants received either cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) of the left IFG coupled with anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) of the right IFG (L−R + ; N = 19), or the opposite treatment (L + R−; N = 21). We hypothesized that L + R− stimulation would enhance IC assessed with the Go NoGo task (GNGT), and that facilitated IC would result in lower creativity scores. The reversed stimulation arrangement (i.e., L− R +) should result in higher creativity scores. We found that tDCS only affected the originality component of the AUT but not flexibility or fluency. We also found no effects on IC, and thus, the mediation effect of IC could not be confirmed. However, we observed a moderation effect: inhibition of left and facilitation of right IFG (L−R +) resulted in enhanced flexibility and originality scores, only when IC performance was also improved. We conclude that inducing a right-to-left gradient in IFG activity by tDCS is efficient in enhancing DT, but only under conditions where tDCS is sufficient to alter IC performance as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7321900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73219002020-07-02 Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control Khalil, Radwa Karim, Ahmed A. Kondinska, Angela Godde, Ben Brain Struct Funct Original Article Divergent thinking (DT) as one component of creativity is the ability to search for multiple solutions to a single problem and is reliably tested with the Alternative Uses Task (AUT). DT depends on activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a prefrontal region that has also been associated with inhibitory control (IC). Experimentally manipulating IC through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) led to alterations in DT. Here, we aimed at further examining such potential mediating effects of IC on DT (measured as flexibility, fluency, and originality in the AUT) by modulating IC tDCS. Participants received either cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) of the left IFG coupled with anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) of the right IFG (L−R + ; N = 19), or the opposite treatment (L + R−; N = 21). We hypothesized that L + R− stimulation would enhance IC assessed with the Go NoGo task (GNGT), and that facilitated IC would result in lower creativity scores. The reversed stimulation arrangement (i.e., L− R +) should result in higher creativity scores. We found that tDCS only affected the originality component of the AUT but not flexibility or fluency. We also found no effects on IC, and thus, the mediation effect of IC could not be confirmed. However, we observed a moderation effect: inhibition of left and facilitation of right IFG (L−R +) resulted in enhanced flexibility and originality scores, only when IC performance was also improved. We conclude that inducing a right-to-left gradient in IFG activity by tDCS is efficient in enhancing DT, but only under conditions where tDCS is sufficient to alter IC performance as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-17 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7321900/ /pubmed/32556475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khalil, Radwa Karim, Ahmed A. Kondinska, Angela Godde, Ben Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
title | Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
title_full | Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
title_fullStr | Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
title_short | Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
title_sort | effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khalilradwa effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationofleftandrightinferiorfrontalgyrusoncreativedivergentthinkingaremoderatedbychangesininhibitioncontrol AT karimahmeda effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationofleftandrightinferiorfrontalgyrusoncreativedivergentthinkingaremoderatedbychangesininhibitioncontrol AT kondinskaangela effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationofleftandrightinferiorfrontalgyrusoncreativedivergentthinkingaremoderatedbychangesininhibitioncontrol AT goddeben effectsoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationofleftandrightinferiorfrontalgyrusoncreativedivergentthinkingaremoderatedbychangesininhibitioncontrol |