Cargando…
Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa
INTRODUCTION: In sub-Saharan African countries, low birthweight (LBW) accounts for three-quarters of under-five mortality and morbidity. However, there is no systematic evidence of sex differences in LBW survival risk. The aim of this protocol is to outline the methodological process of a systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036645 |
_version_ | 1783551614255104000 |
---|---|
author | Gebremeskel, Akalewold T Fantaye, Arone W Faust, Lena E Yaya, Sanni |
author_facet | Gebremeskel, Akalewold T Fantaye, Arone W Faust, Lena E Yaya, Sanni |
author_sort | Gebremeskel, Akalewold T |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In sub-Saharan African countries, low birthweight (LBW) accounts for three-quarters of under-five mortality and morbidity. However, there is no systematic evidence of sex differences in LBW survival risk. The aim of this protocol is to outline the methodological process of a systematic review that will gather qualitative and quantitative data on sex differences in survival among LBW newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols reporting guidelines. We will conduct a systematic review to retrieve all qualitative and quantitative studies. Electronic search strategies are being finalised on 24 February 2020 for Ovid Medline and EMBASE, and on 28 February 2020 for CINAHL, Scopus and Global Health in collaboration with a Health Sciences librarian. The primary outcome of interest is indicating sex differences in survival among LBW newborns and infants. Secondary outcomes are sex-disaggregated differences in morbidity among LBW newborns and infants. Screening, data extraction and assessments of risk of bias will be performed independently. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis will be conducted with studies that are compatible based on population and outcome. The systematic review is focused on the analysis of secondary data and does not require ethics approval. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As it will be a systematic review, without human participants’ involvement, there will be no requirement for ethical approval. The systematic review will present key evidence of sex-disaggregated differences in mortality and morbidity among LBW newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa. Programme managers, policy-makers and researchers can use the findings to evaluate LBW health outcomes in different sexes. The final manuscript will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020163470 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7322278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73222782020-07-02 Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa Gebremeskel, Akalewold T Fantaye, Arone W Faust, Lena E Yaya, Sanni BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: In sub-Saharan African countries, low birthweight (LBW) accounts for three-quarters of under-five mortality and morbidity. However, there is no systematic evidence of sex differences in LBW survival risk. The aim of this protocol is to outline the methodological process of a systematic review that will gather qualitative and quantitative data on sex differences in survival among LBW newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols reporting guidelines. We will conduct a systematic review to retrieve all qualitative and quantitative studies. Electronic search strategies are being finalised on 24 February 2020 for Ovid Medline and EMBASE, and on 28 February 2020 for CINAHL, Scopus and Global Health in collaboration with a Health Sciences librarian. The primary outcome of interest is indicating sex differences in survival among LBW newborns and infants. Secondary outcomes are sex-disaggregated differences in morbidity among LBW newborns and infants. Screening, data extraction and assessments of risk of bias will be performed independently. Narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis will be conducted with studies that are compatible based on population and outcome. The systematic review is focused on the analysis of secondary data and does not require ethics approval. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As it will be a systematic review, without human participants’ involvement, there will be no requirement for ethical approval. The systematic review will present key evidence of sex-disaggregated differences in mortality and morbidity among LBW newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa. Programme managers, policy-makers and researchers can use the findings to evaluate LBW health outcomes in different sexes. The final manuscript will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020163470 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7322278/ /pubmed/32595162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036645 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Global Health Gebremeskel, Akalewold T Fantaye, Arone W Faust, Lena E Yaya, Sanni Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa |
title | Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa |
title_full | Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa |
title_fullStr | Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa |
title_short | Systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-Saharan Africa |
title_sort | systematic review protocol examining sex differences in survival among low birthweight newborns and infants in sub-saharan africa |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gebremeskelakalewoldt systematicreviewprotocolexaminingsexdifferencesinsurvivalamonglowbirthweightnewbornsandinfantsinsubsaharanafrica AT fantayearonew systematicreviewprotocolexaminingsexdifferencesinsurvivalamonglowbirthweightnewbornsandinfantsinsubsaharanafrica AT faustlenae systematicreviewprotocolexaminingsexdifferencesinsurvivalamonglowbirthweightnewbornsandinfantsinsubsaharanafrica AT yayasanni systematicreviewprotocolexaminingsexdifferencesinsurvivalamonglowbirthweightnewbornsandinfantsinsubsaharanafrica |