Cargando…

Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study

INTRODUCTION: Studies regarding the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) report conflicting findings. This is partly due to different outcome measures being used to evaluate severity of MBO and the response to treatments. Furthermore, current outcome measures focus mainly on measurable ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baddeley, Elin, Bravington, Alison, Johnson, Miriam, Currow, David C, Murtagh, Fliss EM, Boland, Elaine, Obita, George, Nelson, Annmarie, Seddon, Kathy, Oliver, Alfred, Noble, Simon, Boland, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154
_version_ 1783551614499422208
author Baddeley, Elin
Bravington, Alison
Johnson, Miriam
Currow, David C
Murtagh, Fliss EM
Boland, Elaine
Obita, George
Nelson, Annmarie
Seddon, Kathy
Oliver, Alfred
Noble, Simon
Boland, Jason
author_facet Baddeley, Elin
Bravington, Alison
Johnson, Miriam
Currow, David C
Murtagh, Fliss EM
Boland, Elaine
Obita, George
Nelson, Annmarie
Seddon, Kathy
Oliver, Alfred
Noble, Simon
Boland, Jason
author_sort Baddeley, Elin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Studies regarding the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) report conflicting findings. This is partly due to different outcome measures being used to evaluate severity of MBO and the response to treatments. Furthermore, current outcome measures focus mainly on measurable physiological parameters which may not correlate strongly with patient-defined quality of life. The development of core outcome sets allows a consistent approach to evaluating clinical conditions taking into consideration patient, healthcare professional and researcher viewpoints. It follows an internationally recognised standard methodology. We present a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for Research and Assessment of MBO (RAMBO). METHODS: RAMBO is a multicentre study, comprising of four phases: a systematic review to examine current scope of outcome measures associated with MBO (phase I). Interviews with patients, companions and healthcare professionals will explore priorities and preferences for care and outcomes (phase II). An expert panel meeting will collate the findings into a set of outcomes (phase III), refined by consensus through a Delphi survey with key stakeholders (phase IV). The final set of outcomes will be ratified at a consensus meeting. Each step will actively include patient partners. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (Wales REC 5, REF: 19/LO/1876). Study participants and relevant stakeholders will be updated with newsletters and a lay summary at the end of the study. Abstracts will be submitted to national and international conferences, result papers will be submitted to peer-reviewed, open access journals. TRIAL AND PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (1402); Systematic Literature Review (CRD42019150648); Rapid Review (CRD42020176393).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73222792020-07-02 Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study Baddeley, Elin Bravington, Alison Johnson, Miriam Currow, David C Murtagh, Fliss EM Boland, Elaine Obita, George Nelson, Annmarie Seddon, Kathy Oliver, Alfred Noble, Simon Boland, Jason BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Studies regarding the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) report conflicting findings. This is partly due to different outcome measures being used to evaluate severity of MBO and the response to treatments. Furthermore, current outcome measures focus mainly on measurable physiological parameters which may not correlate strongly with patient-defined quality of life. The development of core outcome sets allows a consistent approach to evaluating clinical conditions taking into consideration patient, healthcare professional and researcher viewpoints. It follows an internationally recognised standard methodology. We present a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for Research and Assessment of MBO (RAMBO). METHODS: RAMBO is a multicentre study, comprising of four phases: a systematic review to examine current scope of outcome measures associated with MBO (phase I). Interviews with patients, companions and healthcare professionals will explore priorities and preferences for care and outcomes (phase II). An expert panel meeting will collate the findings into a set of outcomes (phase III), refined by consensus through a Delphi survey with key stakeholders (phase IV). The final set of outcomes will be ratified at a consensus meeting. Each step will actively include patient partners. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (Wales REC 5, REF: 19/LO/1876). Study participants and relevant stakeholders will be updated with newsletters and a lay summary at the end of the study. Abstracts will be submitted to national and international conferences, result papers will be submitted to peer-reviewed, open access journals. TRIAL AND PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (1402); Systematic Literature Review (CRD42019150648); Rapid Review (CRD42020176393). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7322279/ /pubmed/32595168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Baddeley, Elin
Bravington, Alison
Johnson, Miriam
Currow, David C
Murtagh, Fliss EM
Boland, Elaine
Obita, George
Nelson, Annmarie
Seddon, Kathy
Oliver, Alfred
Noble, Simon
Boland, Jason
Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
title Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
title_full Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
title_fullStr Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
title_short Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
title_sort development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the rambo study
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154
work_keys_str_mv AT baddeleyelin developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT bravingtonalison developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT johnsonmiriam developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT currowdavidc developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT murtaghflissem developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT bolandelaine developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT obitageorge developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT nelsonannmarie developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT seddonkathy developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT oliveralfred developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT noblesimon developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy
AT bolandjason developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy