Cargando…
Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study
INTRODUCTION: Studies regarding the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) report conflicting findings. This is partly due to different outcome measures being used to evaluate severity of MBO and the response to treatments. Furthermore, current outcome measures focus mainly on measurable ph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154 |
_version_ | 1783551614499422208 |
---|---|
author | Baddeley, Elin Bravington, Alison Johnson, Miriam Currow, David C Murtagh, Fliss EM Boland, Elaine Obita, George Nelson, Annmarie Seddon, Kathy Oliver, Alfred Noble, Simon Boland, Jason |
author_facet | Baddeley, Elin Bravington, Alison Johnson, Miriam Currow, David C Murtagh, Fliss EM Boland, Elaine Obita, George Nelson, Annmarie Seddon, Kathy Oliver, Alfred Noble, Simon Boland, Jason |
author_sort | Baddeley, Elin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Studies regarding the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) report conflicting findings. This is partly due to different outcome measures being used to evaluate severity of MBO and the response to treatments. Furthermore, current outcome measures focus mainly on measurable physiological parameters which may not correlate strongly with patient-defined quality of life. The development of core outcome sets allows a consistent approach to evaluating clinical conditions taking into consideration patient, healthcare professional and researcher viewpoints. It follows an internationally recognised standard methodology. We present a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for Research and Assessment of MBO (RAMBO). METHODS: RAMBO is a multicentre study, comprising of four phases: a systematic review to examine current scope of outcome measures associated with MBO (phase I). Interviews with patients, companions and healthcare professionals will explore priorities and preferences for care and outcomes (phase II). An expert panel meeting will collate the findings into a set of outcomes (phase III), refined by consensus through a Delphi survey with key stakeholders (phase IV). The final set of outcomes will be ratified at a consensus meeting. Each step will actively include patient partners. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (Wales REC 5, REF: 19/LO/1876). Study participants and relevant stakeholders will be updated with newsletters and a lay summary at the end of the study. Abstracts will be submitted to national and international conferences, result papers will be submitted to peer-reviewed, open access journals. TRIAL AND PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (1402); Systematic Literature Review (CRD42019150648); Rapid Review (CRD42020176393). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7322279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73222792020-07-02 Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study Baddeley, Elin Bravington, Alison Johnson, Miriam Currow, David C Murtagh, Fliss EM Boland, Elaine Obita, George Nelson, Annmarie Seddon, Kathy Oliver, Alfred Noble, Simon Boland, Jason BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Studies regarding the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) report conflicting findings. This is partly due to different outcome measures being used to evaluate severity of MBO and the response to treatments. Furthermore, current outcome measures focus mainly on measurable physiological parameters which may not correlate strongly with patient-defined quality of life. The development of core outcome sets allows a consistent approach to evaluating clinical conditions taking into consideration patient, healthcare professional and researcher viewpoints. It follows an internationally recognised standard methodology. We present a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for Research and Assessment of MBO (RAMBO). METHODS: RAMBO is a multicentre study, comprising of four phases: a systematic review to examine current scope of outcome measures associated with MBO (phase I). Interviews with patients, companions and healthcare professionals will explore priorities and preferences for care and outcomes (phase II). An expert panel meeting will collate the findings into a set of outcomes (phase III), refined by consensus through a Delphi survey with key stakeholders (phase IV). The final set of outcomes will be ratified at a consensus meeting. Each step will actively include patient partners. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics will be used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (Wales REC 5, REF: 19/LO/1876). Study participants and relevant stakeholders will be updated with newsletters and a lay summary at the end of the study. Abstracts will be submitted to national and international conferences, result papers will be submitted to peer-reviewed, open access journals. TRIAL AND PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (1402); Systematic Literature Review (CRD42019150648); Rapid Review (CRD42020176393). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7322279/ /pubmed/32595168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Baddeley, Elin Bravington, Alison Johnson, Miriam Currow, David C Murtagh, Fliss EM Boland, Elaine Obita, George Nelson, Annmarie Seddon, Kathy Oliver, Alfred Noble, Simon Boland, Jason Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study |
title | Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study |
title_full | Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study |
title_fullStr | Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study |
title_short | Development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the RAMBO study |
title_sort | development of a core outcome set to use in the research and assessment of malignant bowel obstruction: protocol for the rambo study |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baddeleyelin developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT bravingtonalison developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT johnsonmiriam developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT currowdavidc developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT murtaghflissem developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT bolandelaine developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT obitageorge developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT nelsonannmarie developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT seddonkathy developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT oliveralfred developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT noblesimon developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy AT bolandjason developmentofacoreoutcomesettouseintheresearchandassessmentofmalignantbowelobstructionprotocolfortherambostudy |