Cargando…
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Clinician empathy is a vital component of high-quality healthcare. Healthcare disparities may reflect a societal lack of empathy for disadvantaged persons in general, and recent research suggests that socioeconomic disparities exist in patient satisfaction with clinicians. However, it...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034247 |
_version_ | 1783551617118765056 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Brian W Trzeciak, Christian J Puri, Nitin K Mazzarelli, Anthony J Trzeciak, Stephen |
author_facet | Roberts, Brian W Trzeciak, Christian J Puri, Nitin K Mazzarelli, Anthony J Trzeciak, Stephen |
author_sort | Roberts, Brian W |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinician empathy is a vital component of high-quality healthcare. Healthcare disparities may reflect a societal lack of empathy for disadvantaged persons in general, and recent research suggests that socioeconomic disparities exist in patient satisfaction with clinicians. However, it is currently unclear if there are disparities in patient experience of empathy from clinicians. Our objective is to systematically analyse the scientific literature to test the hypothesis that racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities exist in patient-reported experience of clinician empathy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In accordance with published methodological guidelines for conducting a systematic review, we will analyse studies reporting patient assessment of clinician empathy using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, which to date is the most commonly used and well-validated methodology in clinical research for measuring clinician empathy from the patient’s perspective. We will use a standardised data collection template and assess study quality (risk of bias) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will abstract data for the CARE measure stratified by race and SES, and we will contact the corresponding authors to obtain stratified data by race/SES if not reported in the original manuscript. Where appropriate, we will pool the data and perform quantitative meta-analysis to test if non-white (compared to white) patients and low SES (compared to high SES) patients report lower scores for clinician empathy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No individual patient-level data will be collected and thus the proposed systematic review does not require ethical approval. This systematic review will test if racial and SES differences exist in patient experience of clinician empathy, and will inform future research to help promote healthcare equity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142809. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7322320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73223202020-07-02 Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Roberts, Brian W Trzeciak, Christian J Puri, Nitin K Mazzarelli, Anthony J Trzeciak, Stephen BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Clinician empathy is a vital component of high-quality healthcare. Healthcare disparities may reflect a societal lack of empathy for disadvantaged persons in general, and recent research suggests that socioeconomic disparities exist in patient satisfaction with clinicians. However, it is currently unclear if there are disparities in patient experience of empathy from clinicians. Our objective is to systematically analyse the scientific literature to test the hypothesis that racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities exist in patient-reported experience of clinician empathy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In accordance with published methodological guidelines for conducting a systematic review, we will analyse studies reporting patient assessment of clinician empathy using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, which to date is the most commonly used and well-validated methodology in clinical research for measuring clinician empathy from the patient’s perspective. We will use a standardised data collection template and assess study quality (risk of bias) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will abstract data for the CARE measure stratified by race and SES, and we will contact the corresponding authors to obtain stratified data by race/SES if not reported in the original manuscript. Where appropriate, we will pool the data and perform quantitative meta-analysis to test if non-white (compared to white) patients and low SES (compared to high SES) patients report lower scores for clinician empathy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No individual patient-level data will be collected and thus the proposed systematic review does not require ethical approval. This systematic review will test if racial and SES differences exist in patient experience of clinician empathy, and will inform future research to help promote healthcare equity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142809. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7322320/ /pubmed/32595149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034247 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Roberts, Brian W Trzeciak, Christian J Puri, Nitin K Mazzarelli, Anthony J Trzeciak, Stephen Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsbrianw racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT trzeciakchristianj racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT purinitink racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mazzarellianthonyj racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT trzeciakstephen racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |