Cargando…

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Clinician empathy is a vital component of high-quality healthcare. Healthcare disparities may reflect a societal lack of empathy for disadvantaged persons in general, and recent research suggests that socioeconomic disparities exist in patient satisfaction with clinicians. However, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Brian W, Trzeciak, Christian J, Puri, Nitin K, Mazzarelli, Anthony J, Trzeciak, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034247
_version_ 1783551617118765056
author Roberts, Brian W
Trzeciak, Christian J
Puri, Nitin K
Mazzarelli, Anthony J
Trzeciak, Stephen
author_facet Roberts, Brian W
Trzeciak, Christian J
Puri, Nitin K
Mazzarelli, Anthony J
Trzeciak, Stephen
author_sort Roberts, Brian W
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinician empathy is a vital component of high-quality healthcare. Healthcare disparities may reflect a societal lack of empathy for disadvantaged persons in general, and recent research suggests that socioeconomic disparities exist in patient satisfaction with clinicians. However, it is currently unclear if there are disparities in patient experience of empathy from clinicians. Our objective is to systematically analyse the scientific literature to test the hypothesis that racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities exist in patient-reported experience of clinician empathy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In accordance with published methodological guidelines for conducting a systematic review, we will analyse studies reporting patient assessment of clinician empathy using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, which to date is the most commonly used and well-validated methodology in clinical research for measuring clinician empathy from the patient’s perspective. We will use a standardised data collection template and assess study quality (risk of bias) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will abstract data for the CARE measure stratified by race and SES, and we will contact the corresponding authors to obtain stratified data by race/SES if not reported in the original manuscript. Where appropriate, we will pool the data and perform quantitative meta-analysis to test if non-white (compared to white) patients and low SES (compared to high SES) patients report lower scores for clinician empathy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No individual patient-level data will be collected and thus the proposed systematic review does not require ethical approval. This systematic review will test if racial and SES differences exist in patient experience of clinician empathy, and will inform future research to help promote healthcare equity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142809.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73223202020-07-02 Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Roberts, Brian W Trzeciak, Christian J Puri, Nitin K Mazzarelli, Anthony J Trzeciak, Stephen BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Clinician empathy is a vital component of high-quality healthcare. Healthcare disparities may reflect a societal lack of empathy for disadvantaged persons in general, and recent research suggests that socioeconomic disparities exist in patient satisfaction with clinicians. However, it is currently unclear if there are disparities in patient experience of empathy from clinicians. Our objective is to systematically analyse the scientific literature to test the hypothesis that racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities exist in patient-reported experience of clinician empathy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In accordance with published methodological guidelines for conducting a systematic review, we will analyse studies reporting patient assessment of clinician empathy using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, which to date is the most commonly used and well-validated methodology in clinical research for measuring clinician empathy from the patient’s perspective. We will use a standardised data collection template and assess study quality (risk of bias) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We will abstract data for the CARE measure stratified by race and SES, and we will contact the corresponding authors to obtain stratified data by race/SES if not reported in the original manuscript. Where appropriate, we will pool the data and perform quantitative meta-analysis to test if non-white (compared to white) patients and low SES (compared to high SES) patients report lower scores for clinician empathy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No individual patient-level data will be collected and thus the proposed systematic review does not require ethical approval. This systematic review will test if racial and SES differences exist in patient experience of clinician empathy, and will inform future research to help promote healthcare equity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142809. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7322320/ /pubmed/32595149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034247 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Roberts, Brian W
Trzeciak, Christian J
Puri, Nitin K
Mazzarelli, Anthony J
Trzeciak, Stephen
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort racial and socioeconomic disparities in patient experience of clinician empathy: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034247
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsbrianw racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trzeciakchristianj racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT purinitink racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mazzarellianthonyj racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trzeciakstephen racialandsocioeconomicdisparitiesinpatientexperienceofclinicianempathyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis