Cargando…

Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()

Given the importance that two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models have attained in recent years, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on the topic focusing on the banking industry. We discuss the two-stage terminology itself, which is not yet not consolidated. We also d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henriques, Iago Cotrim, Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim, Kimura, Herbert, Mariano, Enzo Barberio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113632
_version_ 1783551654243598336
author Henriques, Iago Cotrim
Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim
Kimura, Herbert
Mariano, Enzo Barberio
author_facet Henriques, Iago Cotrim
Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim
Kimura, Herbert
Mariano, Enzo Barberio
author_sort Henriques, Iago Cotrim
collection PubMed
description Given the importance that two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models have attained in recent years, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on the topic focusing on the banking industry. We discuss the two-stage terminology itself, which is not yet not consolidated. We also discuss the current state-of-the-art and present opportunities, as well as challenges, for future studies. We analyse 59 papers, divided them into ten classes that cover various perspectives of two stage DEA studies, such as the economic context, geographic region of the banking units, methodological characteristics, and type of the models, either internal or external. Additionally, we investigate several controversial points regarding two-stage DEA models, such as the variable selection approach, the technique used in the second stage, and the possible impact of non-discretionary variables on efficiency. Results of the literature review indicate the lack of a uniform or universal terminology for two-stage DEA models in the baking industry. Moreover, the main objective of most papers involves extending or improving DEA models. Radial models, with variable returns of scale, and the intermediation approach are the most frequent configurations. Finally, we identify seven gaps in the literature for both internal and external two-stage DEA models and two specific gaps to external ones. Each gap is discussed in depth in the text and can be considered opportunities for future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73224932020-06-29 Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions() Henriques, Iago Cotrim Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim Kimura, Herbert Mariano, Enzo Barberio Expert Syst Appl Article Given the importance that two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models have attained in recent years, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on the topic focusing on the banking industry. We discuss the two-stage terminology itself, which is not yet not consolidated. We also discuss the current state-of-the-art and present opportunities, as well as challenges, for future studies. We analyse 59 papers, divided them into ten classes that cover various perspectives of two stage DEA studies, such as the economic context, geographic region of the banking units, methodological characteristics, and type of the models, either internal or external. Additionally, we investigate several controversial points regarding two-stage DEA models, such as the variable selection approach, the technique used in the second stage, and the possible impact of non-discretionary variables on efficiency. Results of the literature review indicate the lack of a uniform or universal terminology for two-stage DEA models in the baking industry. Moreover, the main objective of most papers involves extending or improving DEA models. Radial models, with variable returns of scale, and the intermediation approach are the most frequent configurations. Finally, we identify seven gaps in the literature for both internal and external two-stage DEA models and two specific gaps to external ones. Each gap is discussed in depth in the text and can be considered opportunities for future studies. Elsevier Ltd. 2020-12-15 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7322493/ /pubmed/32834557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113632 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Henriques, Iago Cotrim
Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim
Kimura, Herbert
Mariano, Enzo Barberio
Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()
title Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()
title_full Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()
title_fullStr Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()
title_full_unstemmed Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()
title_short Two-stage DEA in banks: Terminological controversies and future directions()
title_sort two-stage dea in banks: terminological controversies and future directions()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113632
work_keys_str_mv AT henriquesiagocotrim twostagedeainbanksterminologicalcontroversiesandfuturedirections
AT sobreiroviniciusamorim twostagedeainbanksterminologicalcontroversiesandfuturedirections
AT kimuraherbert twostagedeainbanksterminologicalcontroversiesandfuturedirections
AT marianoenzobarberio twostagedeainbanksterminologicalcontroversiesandfuturedirections