Cargando…

Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. Newborn screening is paramount for early diagnosis and enrolment of affected children into a comprehensive care programme. Up to now, this strategy has been greatly i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nnodu, Obiageli E, Sopekan, Alayo, Nnebe-Agumadu, Uche, Ohiaeri, Chinatu, Adeniran, Adeyemi, Shedul, Grace, Isa, Hezekiah A, Owolabi, Olumide, Chianumba, Reuben I, Tanko, Yohanna, Iyobosa, Juliet H, Adekile, Adekunle D, Olapade, Olufunmilayo I, Piel, Frédéric B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30143-5
_version_ 1783551666070487040
author Nnodu, Obiageli E
Sopekan, Alayo
Nnebe-Agumadu, Uche
Ohiaeri, Chinatu
Adeniran, Adeyemi
Shedul, Grace
Isa, Hezekiah A
Owolabi, Olumide
Chianumba, Reuben I
Tanko, Yohanna
Iyobosa, Juliet H
Adekile, Adekunle D
Olapade, Olufunmilayo I
Piel, Frédéric B
author_facet Nnodu, Obiageli E
Sopekan, Alayo
Nnebe-Agumadu, Uche
Ohiaeri, Chinatu
Adeniran, Adeyemi
Shedul, Grace
Isa, Hezekiah A
Owolabi, Olumide
Chianumba, Reuben I
Tanko, Yohanna
Iyobosa, Juliet H
Adekile, Adekunle D
Olapade, Olufunmilayo I
Piel, Frédéric B
author_sort Nnodu, Obiageli E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. Newborn screening is paramount for early diagnosis and enrolment of affected children into a comprehensive care programme. Up to now, this strategy has been greatly impaired in resource-poor countries, because screening methods are technologically and financially intensive; affordable, reliable, and accurate methods are needed. We aimed to test the feasibility of implementing a sickle cell disease screening programme using innovative point-of-care test devices into existing immunisation programmes in primary health-care settings. METHODS: Building on a routine immunisation programme and using existing facilities and staff, we did a prospective feasibility study at five primary health-care centres within Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria. We systematically screened for sickle cell disease consecutive newborn babies and infants younger than 9 months who presented to immunisation clinics at these five centres, using an ELISA-based point-of care test (HemoTypeSC). A subgroup of consecutive babies who presented to immunisation clinics at the primary health-care centres, whose mothers gave consent, were tested by the HemoTypeSC point-of-care test alongside a different immunoassay-based point-of-care test (SickleSCAN) and the gold standard test, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). FINDINGS: Between July 14, 2017, and Sept 3, 2019, 3603 newborn babies and infants who presented for immunisation were screened for sickle cell disease at five primary health-care centres using the ELISA-based point-of-care test. We identified 51 (1%) children with sickle cell anaemia (HbSS), four (<1%) heterozygous for HbS and HbC (HbSC), 740 (21%) with sickle cell trait (HbAS), 34 (1%) heterozygous for HbA and HbC (HbAC), and 2774 (77%) with normal haemoglobin (HbAA). Of the 55 babies and infants with confirmed sickle cell disease, 41 (75%) were enrolled into a programme for free folic acid and penicillin, of whom 36 (88%) completed three visits over 9 months (median follow-up 226 days [IQR 198–357]). The head-to-head comparison between the two point-of-care tests and HPLC showed concordance between the three testing methods in screening 313 newborn babies, with a specificity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC, and a sensitivity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC. INTERPRETATION: Our pilot study shows that the integration of newborn screening into existing primary health-care immunisation programmes is feasible and can rapidly be implemented with limited resources. Point-of-care tests are reliable and accurate in newborn screening for sickle cell disease. This feasibility study bodes well for the care of patients with sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries. FUNDING: Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Imperial College London Wellcome Trust Centre for Global Health Research, and Richard and Susan Kiphart Family Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73225552020-06-30 Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study Nnodu, Obiageli E Sopekan, Alayo Nnebe-Agumadu, Uche Ohiaeri, Chinatu Adeniran, Adeyemi Shedul, Grace Isa, Hezekiah A Owolabi, Olumide Chianumba, Reuben I Tanko, Yohanna Iyobosa, Juliet H Adekile, Adekunle D Olapade, Olufunmilayo I Piel, Frédéric B Lancet Haematol Article BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. Newborn screening is paramount for early diagnosis and enrolment of affected children into a comprehensive care programme. Up to now, this strategy has been greatly impaired in resource-poor countries, because screening methods are technologically and financially intensive; affordable, reliable, and accurate methods are needed. We aimed to test the feasibility of implementing a sickle cell disease screening programme using innovative point-of-care test devices into existing immunisation programmes in primary health-care settings. METHODS: Building on a routine immunisation programme and using existing facilities and staff, we did a prospective feasibility study at five primary health-care centres within Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria. We systematically screened for sickle cell disease consecutive newborn babies and infants younger than 9 months who presented to immunisation clinics at these five centres, using an ELISA-based point-of care test (HemoTypeSC). A subgroup of consecutive babies who presented to immunisation clinics at the primary health-care centres, whose mothers gave consent, were tested by the HemoTypeSC point-of-care test alongside a different immunoassay-based point-of-care test (SickleSCAN) and the gold standard test, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). FINDINGS: Between July 14, 2017, and Sept 3, 2019, 3603 newborn babies and infants who presented for immunisation were screened for sickle cell disease at five primary health-care centres using the ELISA-based point-of-care test. We identified 51 (1%) children with sickle cell anaemia (HbSS), four (<1%) heterozygous for HbS and HbC (HbSC), 740 (21%) with sickle cell trait (HbAS), 34 (1%) heterozygous for HbA and HbC (HbAC), and 2774 (77%) with normal haemoglobin (HbAA). Of the 55 babies and infants with confirmed sickle cell disease, 41 (75%) were enrolled into a programme for free folic acid and penicillin, of whom 36 (88%) completed three visits over 9 months (median follow-up 226 days [IQR 198–357]). The head-to-head comparison between the two point-of-care tests and HPLC showed concordance between the three testing methods in screening 313 newborn babies, with a specificity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC, and a sensitivity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC. INTERPRETATION: Our pilot study shows that the integration of newborn screening into existing primary health-care immunisation programmes is feasible and can rapidly be implemented with limited resources. Point-of-care tests are reliable and accurate in newborn screening for sickle cell disease. This feasibility study bodes well for the care of patients with sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries. FUNDING: Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Imperial College London Wellcome Trust Centre for Global Health Research, and Richard and Susan Kiphart Family Foundation. Elsevier Ltd 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7322555/ /pubmed/32589979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30143-5 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access Article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nnodu, Obiageli E
Sopekan, Alayo
Nnebe-Agumadu, Uche
Ohiaeri, Chinatu
Adeniran, Adeyemi
Shedul, Grace
Isa, Hezekiah A
Owolabi, Olumide
Chianumba, Reuben I
Tanko, Yohanna
Iyobosa, Juliet H
Adekile, Adekunle D
Olapade, Olufunmilayo I
Piel, Frédéric B
Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study
title Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study
title_full Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study
title_short Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study
title_sort implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in nigeria: a feasibility study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30143-5
work_keys_str_mv AT nnoduobiagelie implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT sopekanalayo implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT nnebeagumaduuche implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT ohiaerichinatu implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT adeniranadeyemi implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT shedulgrace implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT isahezekiaha implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT owolabiolumide implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT chianumbareubeni implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT tankoyohanna implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT iyobosajulieth implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT adekileadekunled implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT olapadeolufunmilayoi implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy
AT pielfredericb implementingnewbornscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseaspartofimmunisationprogrammesinnigeriaafeasibilitystudy