Cargando…

Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The objective of this manuscript is to present challenges and solutions that arose during a mid-sized single-site RCT of a rehabilitation intervention performed in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Seventy-six participants from an inpatient stroke rehabilitation u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheehy, Lisa, Taillon-Hobson, Anne, Sveistrup, Heidi, Bilodeau, Martin, Finestone, Hillel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100563
_version_ 1783551711242092544
author Sheehy, Lisa
Taillon-Hobson, Anne
Sveistrup, Heidi
Bilodeau, Martin
Finestone, Hillel
author_facet Sheehy, Lisa
Taillon-Hobson, Anne
Sveistrup, Heidi
Bilodeau, Martin
Finestone, Hillel
author_sort Sheehy, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The objective of this manuscript is to present challenges and solutions that arose during a mid-sized single-site RCT of a rehabilitation intervention performed in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Seventy-six participants from an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit were randomized to experimental and control groups. All participants did 30–45 min of virtual reality (VR) daily for 10–12 sessions. The experimental group did VR targeting sitting balance while the control group did VR with limited arm movement. Challenges during the implementation of the RCT were documented and strategies to mitigate them were applied. RESULTS: Challenges were placed into five categories: 1. Recruitment. Our recruitment procedures required multiple steps prior to initiating direct patient contact; one solution would be to have patients consent to be approached about research upon admission to the inpatient unit. 2. Patient-specific Issues. Fatigue, pain, vision problems and engagement were managed through scheduling, increasing the workload slowly and personalized modifications to the VR. 3./4. Scheduling and Staffing. Recruitment and attendance at VR sessions were maximized through good communication, flexibility and cooperation, between research staff, clinical staff, volunteers, students and participants. 5. Technology. Because hospital internet service was poor, a mobile internet data plan was purchased to ensure the system's reliability. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified challenges in delivering a rehabilitation intervention on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit and some of the measures taken to surmount these challenges. Through good planning, flexibility and collaboration, almost all of the challenges were successfully addressed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02285933.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73228032020-07-01 Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned Sheehy, Lisa Taillon-Hobson, Anne Sveistrup, Heidi Bilodeau, Martin Finestone, Hillel Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The objective of this manuscript is to present challenges and solutions that arose during a mid-sized single-site RCT of a rehabilitation intervention performed in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation setting. METHODS: Seventy-six participants from an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit were randomized to experimental and control groups. All participants did 30–45 min of virtual reality (VR) daily for 10–12 sessions. The experimental group did VR targeting sitting balance while the control group did VR with limited arm movement. Challenges during the implementation of the RCT were documented and strategies to mitigate them were applied. RESULTS: Challenges were placed into five categories: 1. Recruitment. Our recruitment procedures required multiple steps prior to initiating direct patient contact; one solution would be to have patients consent to be approached about research upon admission to the inpatient unit. 2. Patient-specific Issues. Fatigue, pain, vision problems and engagement were managed through scheduling, increasing the workload slowly and personalized modifications to the VR. 3./4. Scheduling and Staffing. Recruitment and attendance at VR sessions were maximized through good communication, flexibility and cooperation, between research staff, clinical staff, volunteers, students and participants. 5. Technology. Because hospital internet service was poor, a mobile internet data plan was purchased to ensure the system's reliability. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified challenges in delivering a rehabilitation intervention on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit and some of the measures taken to surmount these challenges. Through good planning, flexibility and collaboration, almost all of the challenges were successfully addressed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02285933. Elsevier 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7322803/ /pubmed/32617429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100563 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sheehy, Lisa
Taillon-Hobson, Anne
Sveistrup, Heidi
Bilodeau, Martin
Finestone, Hillel
Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned
title Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned
title_full Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned
title_fullStr Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned
title_short Implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: Lessons learned
title_sort implementation of a randomized controlled trial on an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit: lessons learned
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100563
work_keys_str_mv AT sheehylisa implementationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonaninpatientstrokerehabilitationunitlessonslearned
AT taillonhobsonanne implementationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonaninpatientstrokerehabilitationunitlessonslearned
AT sveistrupheidi implementationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonaninpatientstrokerehabilitationunitlessonslearned
AT bilodeaumartin implementationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonaninpatientstrokerehabilitationunitlessonslearned
AT finestonehillel implementationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialonaninpatientstrokerehabilitationunitlessonslearned