Cargando…

The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015

BACKGROUND: Population models have been developed to evaluate the impact of new tobacco products on the overall population. Reliable input parameters such as longitudinal tobacco use transitions are needed to quantify the net population health impact including the number of premature deaths prevente...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Lai, Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S., Hannel, Thaddaeus, Pithawalla, Yezdi B., Gogova, Maria, Chow, Simeon, Black, Ryan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32600439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00386-z
_version_ 1783551728408330240
author Wei, Lai
Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S.
Hannel, Thaddaeus
Pithawalla, Yezdi B.
Gogova, Maria
Chow, Simeon
Black, Ryan A.
author_facet Wei, Lai
Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S.
Hannel, Thaddaeus
Pithawalla, Yezdi B.
Gogova, Maria
Chow, Simeon
Black, Ryan A.
author_sort Wei, Lai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Population models have been developed to evaluate the impact of new tobacco products on the overall population. Reliable input parameters such as longitudinal tobacco use transitions are needed to quantify the net population health impact including the number of premature deaths prevented, additional life years, and changes in cigarette smoking prevalence. METHODS: This secondary analysis assessed transition patterns from PATH wave 1 (2013–14) to wave 2 (2014–15) among adult exclusive cigarette smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, and dual users. Transition probabilities were calculated by taking into account factors including cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use histories and experimental or established use behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to further evaluate factors associated with transition patterns. RESULTS: Differential transition probabilities emerged among study subgroups when taking into account cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use histories and experimental or established use behaviors. For example, overall 45% of exclusive e-cigarette users in wave 1 continued using e-cigarettes exclusively in wave 2. However, we observed approximately 11 to 14% of wave 1 exclusive experimental e-cigarette users continued to use e-cigarette exclusively in wave 2, compared to about 62% of exclusive established e-cigarette users. The history of cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use is another important factor associated with transition patterns. Among experimental e-cigarette users, 7.5% of individuals without a history of cigarette smoking transitioned to exclusive cigarette smoking, compared to 30% of individuals with a history of cigarette smoking. Additionally, 1.3% of exclusive cigarette smokers in wave 1 transitioned to exclusive e-cigarette use, with the highest transition probability (3.7%) observed in the established cigarette smoker with a history of e-cigarette use subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Product use histories and current use behaviors are important factors influencing transitions between product use states. Given that experimental users’ transition behaviors may be more variable and more influenced by tobacco use history, long-term predictions made by population models could be improved by the use of transition probabilities from established users. As transition patterns might be changing over time, long-term transition patterns can be examined through analysis of future waves of PATH data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73228862020-06-30 The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015 Wei, Lai Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S. Hannel, Thaddaeus Pithawalla, Yezdi B. Gogova, Maria Chow, Simeon Black, Ryan A. Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: Population models have been developed to evaluate the impact of new tobacco products on the overall population. Reliable input parameters such as longitudinal tobacco use transitions are needed to quantify the net population health impact including the number of premature deaths prevented, additional life years, and changes in cigarette smoking prevalence. METHODS: This secondary analysis assessed transition patterns from PATH wave 1 (2013–14) to wave 2 (2014–15) among adult exclusive cigarette smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, and dual users. Transition probabilities were calculated by taking into account factors including cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use histories and experimental or established use behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to further evaluate factors associated with transition patterns. RESULTS: Differential transition probabilities emerged among study subgroups when taking into account cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use histories and experimental or established use behaviors. For example, overall 45% of exclusive e-cigarette users in wave 1 continued using e-cigarettes exclusively in wave 2. However, we observed approximately 11 to 14% of wave 1 exclusive experimental e-cigarette users continued to use e-cigarette exclusively in wave 2, compared to about 62% of exclusive established e-cigarette users. The history of cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use is another important factor associated with transition patterns. Among experimental e-cigarette users, 7.5% of individuals without a history of cigarette smoking transitioned to exclusive cigarette smoking, compared to 30% of individuals with a history of cigarette smoking. Additionally, 1.3% of exclusive cigarette smokers in wave 1 transitioned to exclusive e-cigarette use, with the highest transition probability (3.7%) observed in the established cigarette smoker with a history of e-cigarette use subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Product use histories and current use behaviors are important factors influencing transitions between product use states. Given that experimental users’ transition behaviors may be more variable and more influenced by tobacco use history, long-term predictions made by population models could be improved by the use of transition probabilities from established users. As transition patterns might be changing over time, long-term transition patterns can be examined through analysis of future waves of PATH data. BioMed Central 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7322886/ /pubmed/32600439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00386-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wei, Lai
Muhammad-Kah, Raheema S.
Hannel, Thaddaeus
Pithawalla, Yezdi B.
Gogova, Maria
Chow, Simeon
Black, Ryan A.
The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015
title The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015
title_full The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015
title_fullStr The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015
title_full_unstemmed The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015
title_short The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013–2015
title_sort impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (path) study, 2013–2015
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32600439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00386-z
work_keys_str_mv AT weilai theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT muhammadkahraheemas theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT hannelthaddaeus theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT pithawallayezdib theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT gogovamaria theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT chowsimeon theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT blackryana theimpactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT weilai impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT muhammadkahraheemas impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT hannelthaddaeus impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT pithawallayezdib impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT gogovamaria impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT chowsimeon impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015
AT blackryana impactofcigaretteandecigaretteusehistoryontransitionpatternsalongitudinalanalysisofthepopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthpathstudy20132015