Cargando…
A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area
The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32543722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26182 |
_version_ | 1783551753397993472 |
---|---|
author | Meyers, Kristin J. Jones, Meghan E. Goetz, Iris A. Botros, Fady T. Knorr, Jack Manner, David H. Woodward, Brad |
author_facet | Meyers, Kristin J. Jones, Meghan E. Goetz, Iris A. Botros, Fady T. Knorr, Jack Manner, David H. Woodward, Brad |
author_sort | Meyers, Kristin J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the development of symptoms, and to understand duration of positive test results. ACORN is a cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of adult residents presenting asymptomatic for COVID‐like illness, defined as the self‐reported absence of the following three symptoms in the last 7 days: fever (≥100°F), new‐onset or worsening cough, and new‐onset or worsening shortness of breath. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was determined by real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction in nasopharyngeal swab samples. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection prevalence was expressed as a point estimate with 95% confidence interval (CI). Test results are reported for 2953 participants who enrolled and underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing between 7 April 2020 and 16 May 2020. Among tested participants, 91 (3.1%; 95% CI: 2.5%‐3.7%) were positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. Overall, baseline characteristics, medical history, and infection risk factors were comparable between SARS‐CoV‐2 positive and negative participants. Within the ongoing 14‐day follow‐up period for positive participants, 58 (71.6%) of 81 assessed participants remained asymptomatic while others (n = 23, 28.4%) reported one or more symptoms. Indiana had “Stay‐at‐Home” orders in place during nearly the entire test period reported here, yet 3.1% of asymptomatic participants tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. These results indicate screening questions had limited predictive utility for testing in an asymptomatic population and suggest broader testing strategies are needed. Importantly, these findings underscore that more research is needed to understand the viral transmission and the role asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals play in this global pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7323176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73231762020-06-29 A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area Meyers, Kristin J. Jones, Meghan E. Goetz, Iris A. Botros, Fady T. Knorr, Jack Manner, David H. Woodward, Brad J Med Virol Short Communications The Asymptomatic novel CORonavirus iNfection (ACORN) study was designed to investigate the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection in the asymptomatic adult population of the Indianapolis metropolitan area, to follow individuals testing positive for the development of symptoms, and to understand duration of positive test results. ACORN is a cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of adult residents presenting asymptomatic for COVID‐like illness, defined as the self‐reported absence of the following three symptoms in the last 7 days: fever (≥100°F), new‐onset or worsening cough, and new‐onset or worsening shortness of breath. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was determined by real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction in nasopharyngeal swab samples. SARS‐CoV‐2 infection prevalence was expressed as a point estimate with 95% confidence interval (CI). Test results are reported for 2953 participants who enrolled and underwent nasopharyngeal swab testing between 7 April 2020 and 16 May 2020. Among tested participants, 91 (3.1%; 95% CI: 2.5%‐3.7%) were positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. Overall, baseline characteristics, medical history, and infection risk factors were comparable between SARS‐CoV‐2 positive and negative participants. Within the ongoing 14‐day follow‐up period for positive participants, 58 (71.6%) of 81 assessed participants remained asymptomatic while others (n = 23, 28.4%) reported one or more symptoms. Indiana had “Stay‐at‐Home” orders in place during nearly the entire test period reported here, yet 3.1% of asymptomatic participants tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. These results indicate screening questions had limited predictive utility for testing in an asymptomatic population and suggest broader testing strategies are needed. Importantly, these findings underscore that more research is needed to understand the viral transmission and the role asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals play in this global pandemic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-02 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7323176/ /pubmed/32543722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26182 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Meyers, Kristin J. Jones, Meghan E. Goetz, Iris A. Botros, Fady T. Knorr, Jack Manner, David H. Woodward, Brad A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area |
title | A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area |
title_full | A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area |
title_fullStr | A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area |
title_short | A cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 prevalence in the greater Indianapolis area |
title_sort | cross‐sectional community‐based observational study of asymptomatic sars‐cov‐2 prevalence in the greater indianapolis area |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32543722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26182 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerskristinj acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT jonesmeghane acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT goetzirisa acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT botrosfadyt acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT knorrjack acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT mannerdavidh acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT woodwardbrad acrosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT meyerskristinj crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT jonesmeghane crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT goetzirisa crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT botrosfadyt crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT knorrjack crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT mannerdavidh crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea AT woodwardbrad crosssectionalcommunitybasedobservationalstudyofasymptomaticsarscov2prevalenceinthegreaterindianapolisarea |