Cargando…
Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
To combat the COVID‐19 pandemic, millions of PCR tests are performed worldwide. Any deviation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity will reduce the predictive values of the test. Here, we report the occurrence of contaminations of commercial primers/probe sets with the SARS‐CoV‐2 target sequ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13684 |
_version_ | 1783551769274482688 |
---|---|
author | Wernike, Kerstin Keller, Markus Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Groschup, Martin H. Beer, Martin |
author_facet | Wernike, Kerstin Keller, Markus Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Groschup, Martin H. Beer, Martin |
author_sort | Wernike, Kerstin |
collection | PubMed |
description | To combat the COVID‐19 pandemic, millions of PCR tests are performed worldwide. Any deviation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity will reduce the predictive values of the test. Here, we report the occurrence of contaminations of commercial primers/probe sets with the SARS‐CoV‐2 target sequence of the RT‐qPCR as an example for pitfalls during PCR diagnostics affecting diagnostic specificity. In several purchased in‐house primers/probe sets, quantification cycle values as low as 17 were measured for negative control samples. However, there were also primers/probe sets that displayed very low‐level contaminations, which were detected only during thorough internal validation. Hence, it appears imperative to pre‐test each batch of reagents extensively before use in routine diagnosis, to avoid false‐positive results and low positive predictive value in low‐prevalence situations. As such, contaminations may have happened more widely, and COVID‐19 diagnostic results should be re‐assessed retrospectively to validate the epidemiological basis for control measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7323359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73233592020-06-29 Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics Wernike, Kerstin Keller, Markus Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Groschup, Martin H. Beer, Martin Transbound Emerg Dis Rapid Communications To combat the COVID‐19 pandemic, millions of PCR tests are performed worldwide. Any deviation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity will reduce the predictive values of the test. Here, we report the occurrence of contaminations of commercial primers/probe sets with the SARS‐CoV‐2 target sequence of the RT‐qPCR as an example for pitfalls during PCR diagnostics affecting diagnostic specificity. In several purchased in‐house primers/probe sets, quantification cycle values as low as 17 were measured for negative control samples. However, there were also primers/probe sets that displayed very low‐level contaminations, which were detected only during thorough internal validation. Hence, it appears imperative to pre‐test each batch of reagents extensively before use in routine diagnosis, to avoid false‐positive results and low positive predictive value in low‐prevalence situations. As such, contaminations may have happened more widely, and COVID‐19 diagnostic results should be re‐assessed retrospectively to validate the epidemiological basis for control measures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-05 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7323359/ /pubmed/32536002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13684 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Rapid Communications Wernike, Kerstin Keller, Markus Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Groschup, Martin H. Beer, Martin Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics |
title | Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics |
title_full | Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics |
title_fullStr | Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics |
title_full_unstemmed | Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics |
title_short | Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics |
title_sort | pitfalls in sars‐cov‐2 pcr diagnostics |
topic | Rapid Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wernikekerstin pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics AT kellermarkus pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics AT conrathsfranzj pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics AT mettenleiterthomasc pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics AT groschupmartinh pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics AT beermartin pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics |