Cargando…

Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics

To combat the COVID‐19 pandemic, millions of PCR tests are performed worldwide. Any deviation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity will reduce the predictive values of the test. Here, we report the occurrence of contaminations of commercial primers/probe sets with the SARS‐CoV‐2 target sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wernike, Kerstin, Keller, Markus, Conraths, Franz J., Mettenleiter, Thomas C., Groschup, Martin H., Beer, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13684
_version_ 1783551769274482688
author Wernike, Kerstin
Keller, Markus
Conraths, Franz J.
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Groschup, Martin H.
Beer, Martin
author_facet Wernike, Kerstin
Keller, Markus
Conraths, Franz J.
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Groschup, Martin H.
Beer, Martin
author_sort Wernike, Kerstin
collection PubMed
description To combat the COVID‐19 pandemic, millions of PCR tests are performed worldwide. Any deviation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity will reduce the predictive values of the test. Here, we report the occurrence of contaminations of commercial primers/probe sets with the SARS‐CoV‐2 target sequence of the RT‐qPCR as an example for pitfalls during PCR diagnostics affecting diagnostic specificity. In several purchased in‐house primers/probe sets, quantification cycle values as low as 17 were measured for negative control samples. However, there were also primers/probe sets that displayed very low‐level contaminations, which were detected only during thorough internal validation. Hence, it appears imperative to pre‐test each batch of reagents extensively before use in routine diagnosis, to avoid false‐positive results and low positive predictive value in low‐prevalence situations. As such, contaminations may have happened more widely, and COVID‐19 diagnostic results should be re‐assessed retrospectively to validate the epidemiological basis for control measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7323359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73233592020-06-29 Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics Wernike, Kerstin Keller, Markus Conraths, Franz J. Mettenleiter, Thomas C. Groschup, Martin H. Beer, Martin Transbound Emerg Dis Rapid Communications To combat the COVID‐19 pandemic, millions of PCR tests are performed worldwide. Any deviation of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity will reduce the predictive values of the test. Here, we report the occurrence of contaminations of commercial primers/probe sets with the SARS‐CoV‐2 target sequence of the RT‐qPCR as an example for pitfalls during PCR diagnostics affecting diagnostic specificity. In several purchased in‐house primers/probe sets, quantification cycle values as low as 17 were measured for negative control samples. However, there were also primers/probe sets that displayed very low‐level contaminations, which were detected only during thorough internal validation. Hence, it appears imperative to pre‐test each batch of reagents extensively before use in routine diagnosis, to avoid false‐positive results and low positive predictive value in low‐prevalence situations. As such, contaminations may have happened more widely, and COVID‐19 diagnostic results should be re‐assessed retrospectively to validate the epidemiological basis for control measures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-05 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7323359/ /pubmed/32536002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13684 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Rapid Communications
Wernike, Kerstin
Keller, Markus
Conraths, Franz J.
Mettenleiter, Thomas C.
Groschup, Martin H.
Beer, Martin
Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
title Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
title_full Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
title_fullStr Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
title_short Pitfalls in SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR diagnostics
title_sort pitfalls in sars‐cov‐2 pcr diagnostics
topic Rapid Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13684
work_keys_str_mv AT wernikekerstin pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics
AT kellermarkus pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics
AT conrathsfranzj pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics
AT mettenleiterthomasc pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics
AT groschupmartinh pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics
AT beermartin pitfallsinsarscov2pcrdiagnostics