Cargando…
Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection
BACKGROUND: The use of efficient, reliable and sensitive PCR assays is a cornerstone in the race to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this work we performed an independent evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit Researh Use Only (Altona) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. METHODS: A comparative l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104520 |
_version_ | 1783551816826355712 |
---|---|
author | Visseaux, Benoit Le Hingrat, Quentin Collin, Gilles Ferré, Valentine Storto, Alexandre Ichou, Houria Bouzid, Donia Poey, Nora de Montmollin, Etienne Descamps, Diane Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira |
author_facet | Visseaux, Benoit Le Hingrat, Quentin Collin, Gilles Ferré, Valentine Storto, Alexandre Ichou, Houria Bouzid, Donia Poey, Nora de Montmollin, Etienne Descamps, Diane Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira |
author_sort | Visseaux, Benoit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of efficient, reliable and sensitive PCR assays is a cornerstone in the race to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this work we performed an independent evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit Researh Use Only (Altona) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. METHODS: A comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed between RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 and the currently WHO recommended RT-PCR (WHO-PCR) workflow using a quantified clinical sample. Assessment of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 assay was also performed using 83 primary clinical samples in comparison with the WHO-PCR. RESULTS: The RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a slightly higher sensitivity than the WHO recommended assay with a limit of detection at 625 copies/mL instead of 1250 copies/mL for the WHO-PCR in our conditions. The overall percent agreement between RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 and WHO-PCR on 83 clinical samples was 97.6 % (81/83) with a sensitivity at 97.8 % (45/46) and specificity at 97.3 % (36/37). No cross reaction was encountered for the other human coronaviruses (HKU1, OC43, NL63, 229E). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 assay with the reference WHO assay, we observed a slightly better sensitivity of the RealStar® assay. It provides a robust option for all molecular biology laboratories, with a strong real-life LoD and is compatible with various real-time PCR platforms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7323686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73236862020-06-30 Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection Visseaux, Benoit Le Hingrat, Quentin Collin, Gilles Ferré, Valentine Storto, Alexandre Ichou, Houria Bouzid, Donia Poey, Nora de Montmollin, Etienne Descamps, Diane Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND: The use of efficient, reliable and sensitive PCR assays is a cornerstone in the race to contain the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this work we performed an independent evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit Researh Use Only (Altona) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. METHODS: A comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed between RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 and the currently WHO recommended RT-PCR (WHO-PCR) workflow using a quantified clinical sample. Assessment of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 assay was also performed using 83 primary clinical samples in comparison with the WHO-PCR. RESULTS: The RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated a slightly higher sensitivity than the WHO recommended assay with a limit of detection at 625 copies/mL instead of 1250 copies/mL for the WHO-PCR in our conditions. The overall percent agreement between RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 and WHO-PCR on 83 clinical samples was 97.6 % (81/83) with a sensitivity at 97.8 % (45/46) and specificity at 97.3 % (36/37). No cross reaction was encountered for the other human coronaviruses (HKU1, OC43, NL63, 229E). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 assay with the reference WHO assay, we observed a slightly better sensitivity of the RealStar® assay. It provides a robust option for all molecular biology laboratories, with a strong real-life LoD and is compatible with various real-time PCR platforms. Elsevier B.V. 2020-08 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7323686/ /pubmed/32652476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104520 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Visseaux, Benoit Le Hingrat, Quentin Collin, Gilles Ferré, Valentine Storto, Alexandre Ichou, Houria Bouzid, Donia Poey, Nora de Montmollin, Etienne Descamps, Diane Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection |
title | Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection |
title_full | Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection |
title_short | Evaluation of the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection |
title_sort | evaluation of the realstar® sars-cov-2 rt-pcr kit ruo performances and limit of detection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT visseauxbenoit evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT lehingratquentin evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT collingilles evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT ferrevalentine evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT stortoalexandre evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT ichouhouria evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT bouziddonia evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT poeynora evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT demontmollinetienne evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT descampsdiane evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection AT houhoufidouhnadhira evaluationoftherealstarsarscov2rtpcrkitruoperformancesandlimitofdetection |