Cargando…
When evidence says no: gynaecologists’ reasons for (not) recommending ineffective ovarian cancer screening
Autores principales: | Wegwarth, Odette, Pashayan, Nora |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31704891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009854 |
Ejemplares similares
-
US gynecologists’ estimates and beliefs regarding ovarian cancer screening’s effectiveness 5 years after release of the PLCO evidence
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians’ non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Do cancer risk and benefit–harm ratios influence women’s consideration of risk-reducing mastectomy? A scenario-based experiment in five European countries
por: Rebitschek, Felix G., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Women’s perception, attitudes, and intended behavior towards predictive epigenetic risk testing for female cancers in 5 European countries: a cross-sectional online survey
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Disparity among Endocrinologists and Gynaecologists in the Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
por: Alzamil, Hana, et al.
Publicado: (2020)