Cargando…

Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection

BACKGROUND: In the last decades, there have been important developments in the scientific and technological areas of healthcare. On certain occasions this provokes conflict between the patients' rights and the values of healthcare professionals which brings about, within this clinical relations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toro-Flores, Rafael, Bravo-Agüi, Pilar, Catalán-Gómez, María Victoria, González-Hernando, Marisa, Guijarro-Cenisergue, María Jesús, Moreno-Vázquez, Margarita, Roch-Hamelin, Isabel, Velasco-Sanz, Tamara Raquel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29129123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733017731915
_version_ 1783551828348108800
author Toro-Flores, Rafael
Bravo-Agüi, Pilar
Catalán-Gómez, María Victoria
González-Hernando, Marisa
Guijarro-Cenisergue, María Jesús
Moreno-Vázquez, Margarita
Roch-Hamelin, Isabel
Velasco-Sanz, Tamara Raquel
author_facet Toro-Flores, Rafael
Bravo-Agüi, Pilar
Catalán-Gómez, María Victoria
González-Hernando, Marisa
Guijarro-Cenisergue, María Jesús
Moreno-Vázquez, Margarita
Roch-Hamelin, Isabel
Velasco-Sanz, Tamara Raquel
author_sort Toro-Flores, Rafael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the last decades, there have been important developments in the scientific and technological areas of healthcare. On certain occasions this provokes conflict between the patients' rights and the values of healthcare professionals which brings about, within this clinical relationship, the problem of conscientious objection. AIMS: To learn the opinions that the Nurses of the Madrid Autonomous Community have regarding conscientious objection. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-cutting descriptive study. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: The nurses of 9 hospitals and 12 Health Centers in the Madrid Autonomous Community. The study was done by means of an auto completed anonymous questionnaire. The variables studied were social-demographical and their opinions about conscientious objections. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved by the Ethical Community of Clinical Research of the University Hospital Príncipe de Asturias. Participants were assured of maximum confidentiality and anonymity. FINDINGS: A total of 421 nurses answered the questionnaire. In total, 55.6% of the nurses confirmed they were religious believers, and 64.3% declared having poor knowledge regarding conscientious objection. The matters that caused the greatest objections were voluntary abortions, genetic embryo selection, refusal of blood transfusions, and therapy refusal. DISCUSSION: Different authors state that the most significant cases of conscientious objections for health professionals are those regarding carrying out or assisting in abortions, euthanasia, the practice of assisted reproduction and, finally, the prescription and dispensing of the morning-after pill. In our study, the most significant cases in which the nurses would declare conscientious objections would be the refusal to accept treatment, the selection of embryos after genetic diagnosis preimplantation, the patient’s refusal to receive blood transfusions due to religious reasons and pregnant women’s request for voluntary abortions within the first 14 weeks. CONCLUSION: Nurses’ religious beliefs influence their opinions regarding conscientious objection. The nurses who declare themselves as religious believers object in a higher percentage than those without religious beliefs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7323748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73237482020-07-09 Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection Toro-Flores, Rafael Bravo-Agüi, Pilar Catalán-Gómez, María Victoria González-Hernando, Marisa Guijarro-Cenisergue, María Jesús Moreno-Vázquez, Margarita Roch-Hamelin, Isabel Velasco-Sanz, Tamara Raquel Nurs Ethics Original Manuscripts BACKGROUND: In the last decades, there have been important developments in the scientific and technological areas of healthcare. On certain occasions this provokes conflict between the patients' rights and the values of healthcare professionals which brings about, within this clinical relationship, the problem of conscientious objection. AIMS: To learn the opinions that the Nurses of the Madrid Autonomous Community have regarding conscientious objection. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-cutting descriptive study. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: The nurses of 9 hospitals and 12 Health Centers in the Madrid Autonomous Community. The study was done by means of an auto completed anonymous questionnaire. The variables studied were social-demographical and their opinions about conscientious objections. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved by the Ethical Community of Clinical Research of the University Hospital Príncipe de Asturias. Participants were assured of maximum confidentiality and anonymity. FINDINGS: A total of 421 nurses answered the questionnaire. In total, 55.6% of the nurses confirmed they were religious believers, and 64.3% declared having poor knowledge regarding conscientious objection. The matters that caused the greatest objections were voluntary abortions, genetic embryo selection, refusal of blood transfusions, and therapy refusal. DISCUSSION: Different authors state that the most significant cases of conscientious objections for health professionals are those regarding carrying out or assisting in abortions, euthanasia, the practice of assisted reproduction and, finally, the prescription and dispensing of the morning-after pill. In our study, the most significant cases in which the nurses would declare conscientious objections would be the refusal to accept treatment, the selection of embryos after genetic diagnosis preimplantation, the patient’s refusal to receive blood transfusions due to religious reasons and pregnant women’s request for voluntary abortions within the first 14 weeks. CONCLUSION: Nurses’ religious beliefs influence their opinions regarding conscientious objection. The nurses who declare themselves as religious believers object in a higher percentage than those without religious beliefs. SAGE Publications 2017-11-12 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7323748/ /pubmed/29129123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733017731915 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Toro-Flores, Rafael
Bravo-Agüi, Pilar
Catalán-Gómez, María Victoria
González-Hernando, Marisa
Guijarro-Cenisergue, María Jesús
Moreno-Vázquez, Margarita
Roch-Hamelin, Isabel
Velasco-Sanz, Tamara Raquel
Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
title Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
title_full Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
title_fullStr Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
title_full_unstemmed Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
title_short Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
title_sort opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29129123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733017731915
work_keys_str_mv AT torofloresrafael opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT bravoaguipilar opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT catalangomezmariavictoria opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT gonzalezhernandomarisa opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT guijarroceniserguemariajesus opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT morenovazquezmargarita opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT rochhamelinisabel opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection
AT velascosanztamararaquel opinionsofnursesregardingconscientiousobjection