Cargando…

A Review of Contact Lens Dropout

PURPOSE: Contact lens (CL) dropout is likely a major factor contributing to the near stagnant growth in the CL market. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge related to the frequency of CL dropout and the factors associated with it. METHODS: PubMed.gov was searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pucker, Andrew D, Tichenor, Anna A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612404
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S198637
_version_ 1783551838514053120
author Pucker, Andrew D
Tichenor, Anna A
author_facet Pucker, Andrew D
Tichenor, Anna A
author_sort Pucker, Andrew D
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Contact lens (CL) dropout is likely a major factor contributing to the near stagnant growth in the CL market. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge related to the frequency of CL dropout and the factors associated with it. METHODS: PubMed.gov was searched on or before March 22, 2020, with the terms “contact lens” with “dropout” or “cessation” or “disruption” or “discomfort”. Pertinent articles were collected. The references from these articles were likewise searched to identify additional relevant articles. Only manuscripts written in English were included. No study design or date exclusions were imposed on this review. RESULTS: This literature review found that CL dropout was frequent across developed countries, with a CL dropout frequency that ranged between 12.0% and 27.4% (pooled mean = 21.7%). The top cited reason for CL dropout in established CL wearers was discomfort, while vision was the top reason in neophyte CL wearers. If given the chance, CL dropouts are often able to successfully resume CL wear up to 74% of the time. While the literature is mixed with regard to factors promoting CL dropout, meibomian gland dysfunction appears to promote CL dropout. CONCLUSION: CL dropout is a frequently encountered condition that may be curtailed by early detection, patient education, alterative CL options, or early treatment of underlying ocular surface diseases such as meibomian gland dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7323801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73238012020-06-30 A Review of Contact Lens Dropout Pucker, Andrew D Tichenor, Anna A Clin Optom (Auckl) Review PURPOSE: Contact lens (CL) dropout is likely a major factor contributing to the near stagnant growth in the CL market. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge related to the frequency of CL dropout and the factors associated with it. METHODS: PubMed.gov was searched on or before March 22, 2020, with the terms “contact lens” with “dropout” or “cessation” or “disruption” or “discomfort”. Pertinent articles were collected. The references from these articles were likewise searched to identify additional relevant articles. Only manuscripts written in English were included. No study design or date exclusions were imposed on this review. RESULTS: This literature review found that CL dropout was frequent across developed countries, with a CL dropout frequency that ranged between 12.0% and 27.4% (pooled mean = 21.7%). The top cited reason for CL dropout in established CL wearers was discomfort, while vision was the top reason in neophyte CL wearers. If given the chance, CL dropouts are often able to successfully resume CL wear up to 74% of the time. While the literature is mixed with regard to factors promoting CL dropout, meibomian gland dysfunction appears to promote CL dropout. CONCLUSION: CL dropout is a frequently encountered condition that may be curtailed by early detection, patient education, alterative CL options, or early treatment of underlying ocular surface diseases such as meibomian gland dysfunction. Dove 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7323801/ /pubmed/32612404 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S198637 Text en © 2020 Pucker and Tichenor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Pucker, Andrew D
Tichenor, Anna A
A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_full A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_fullStr A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_short A Review of Contact Lens Dropout
title_sort review of contact lens dropout
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7323801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32612404
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S198637
work_keys_str_mv AT puckerandrewd areviewofcontactlensdropout
AT tichenorannaa areviewofcontactlensdropout
AT puckerandrewd reviewofcontactlensdropout
AT tichenorannaa reviewofcontactlensdropout