Cargando…

Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions

In the realm of term rewriting, given terms s and t, a reachability condition [Formula: see text] is called feasible if there is a substitution [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] rewrites into [Formula: see text] in zero or more steps; otherwise, it is called infeasible. Checking infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gutiérrez, Raúl, Lucas, Salvador
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324039/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51054-1_27
_version_ 1783551868895494144
author Gutiérrez, Raúl
Lucas, Salvador
author_facet Gutiérrez, Raúl
Lucas, Salvador
author_sort Gutiérrez, Raúl
collection PubMed
description In the realm of term rewriting, given terms s and t, a reachability condition [Formula: see text] is called feasible if there is a substitution [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] rewrites into [Formula: see text] in zero or more steps; otherwise, it is called infeasible. Checking infeasibility of (sequences of) reachability conditions is important in the analysis of computational properties of rewrite systems like confluence or (operational) termination. In this paper, we generalize this notion of feasibility to arbitrary n-ary relations on terms defined by first-order theories. In this way, properties of computational systems whose operational semantics can be given as a first-order theory can be investigated. We introduce a framework for proving feasibility/infeasibility, and a new tool, infChecker, which implements it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7324039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73240392020-06-30 Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions Gutiérrez, Raúl Lucas, Salvador Automated Reasoning Article In the realm of term rewriting, given terms s and t, a reachability condition [Formula: see text] is called feasible if there is a substitution [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] rewrites into [Formula: see text] in zero or more steps; otherwise, it is called infeasible. Checking infeasibility of (sequences of) reachability conditions is important in the analysis of computational properties of rewrite systems like confluence or (operational) termination. In this paper, we generalize this notion of feasibility to arbitrary n-ary relations on terms defined by first-order theories. In this way, properties of computational systems whose operational semantics can be given as a first-order theory can be investigated. We introduce a framework for proving feasibility/infeasibility, and a new tool, infChecker, which implements it. 2020-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7324039/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51054-1_27 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Gutiérrez, Raúl
Lucas, Salvador
Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions
title Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions
title_full Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions
title_fullStr Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions
title_short Automatically Proving and Disproving Feasibility Conditions
title_sort automatically proving and disproving feasibility conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324039/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51054-1_27
work_keys_str_mv AT gutierrezraul automaticallyprovinganddisprovingfeasibilityconditions
AT lucassalvador automaticallyprovinganddisprovingfeasibilityconditions