Cargando…

Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest

Conservation-development projects are increasingly enacted across large expanses of land where human livelihoods hang in the balance. Recent initiatives–often called ‘landscape approaches’ or ‘ecosystem-based’ conservation–aim to achieve economic development and conservation goals through managing h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Clay, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2514848619826576
_version_ 1783551891626524672
author Clay, Nathan
author_facet Clay, Nathan
author_sort Clay, Nathan
collection PubMed
description Conservation-development projects are increasingly enacted across large expanses of land where human livelihoods hang in the balance. Recent initiatives–often called ‘landscape approaches’ or ‘ecosystem-based’ conservation–aim to achieve economic development and conservation goals through managing hybrid spaces. I argue that the landscape/ecosystem approach is a socioecological fix: an effort to resolve social-environmental crises through sinking capital (financial, natural, and social) into an imagined ecosystem. Rwanda’s Gishwati Forest has been the locus of diverse crises and fixes over the past 40 years, including an industrial forestry and dairy project, a refugee settlement, a privately managed chimpanzee sanctuary, a carbon sequestration platform, and, most recently, an “integrated silvo-pastoral conservation landscape.” This paper considers how these governance schemes have intersected with broader processes of agrarian change to generate crises that subsequent conservation/development projects then attempt to resolve. I demonstrate how visions for ecosystems privilege certain forms of governance around which imagined socioecological histories are mobilized to frame problems and legitimize certain solutions, technologies, and actors. The Gishwati ecosystem and its fixes are repeatedly defined through an imaginary of crisis and degradation that engenders large-scale landscape modification while foreclosing reflection about root causes of crises or how these might be addressed. Thus, even while conservation/development paradigms have shifted over the past 40 years (from separating people and nature to integrating them in conservation landscapes), this crisis-fix metabolism has consistently generated livelihood insecurity for the tens of thousands of people living in and around Gishwati. Imagining and enacting more just and inclusive social-environmental landscapes will require making space for diverse voices to define ecosystem form and function as well as addressing deeply rooted power imbalances that are at the heart of recurrent crises.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7324153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73241532020-07-09 Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest Clay, Nathan Environ Plan E Nat Space Articles Conservation-development projects are increasingly enacted across large expanses of land where human livelihoods hang in the balance. Recent initiatives–often called ‘landscape approaches’ or ‘ecosystem-based’ conservation–aim to achieve economic development and conservation goals through managing hybrid spaces. I argue that the landscape/ecosystem approach is a socioecological fix: an effort to resolve social-environmental crises through sinking capital (financial, natural, and social) into an imagined ecosystem. Rwanda’s Gishwati Forest has been the locus of diverse crises and fixes over the past 40 years, including an industrial forestry and dairy project, a refugee settlement, a privately managed chimpanzee sanctuary, a carbon sequestration platform, and, most recently, an “integrated silvo-pastoral conservation landscape.” This paper considers how these governance schemes have intersected with broader processes of agrarian change to generate crises that subsequent conservation/development projects then attempt to resolve. I demonstrate how visions for ecosystems privilege certain forms of governance around which imagined socioecological histories are mobilized to frame problems and legitimize certain solutions, technologies, and actors. The Gishwati ecosystem and its fixes are repeatedly defined through an imaginary of crisis and degradation that engenders large-scale landscape modification while foreclosing reflection about root causes of crises or how these might be addressed. Thus, even while conservation/development paradigms have shifted over the past 40 years (from separating people and nature to integrating them in conservation landscapes), this crisis-fix metabolism has consistently generated livelihood insecurity for the tens of thousands of people living in and around Gishwati. Imagining and enacting more just and inclusive social-environmental landscapes will require making space for diverse voices to define ecosystem form and function as well as addressing deeply rooted power imbalances that are at the heart of recurrent crises. SAGE Publications 2019-03-06 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7324153/ /pubmed/32656493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2514848619826576 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Clay, Nathan
Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest
title Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest
title_full Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest
title_fullStr Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest
title_full_unstemmed Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest
title_short Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest
title_sort fixing the ecosystem: conservation, crisis and capital in rwanda's gishwati forest
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2514848619826576
work_keys_str_mv AT claynathan fixingtheecosystemconservationcrisisandcapitalinrwandasgishwatiforest