Cargando…

Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies

Background  Techniques to repair aortic pseudoaneurysms have been rapidly evolving. We present our results following open and endovascular repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms from 2009 to 2013. Methods  A total of nine patients underwent pseudoaneurysm repair from April 2009 to February 2013. Of them,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stamou, Sotiris C., Conway, Brian D., Nores, Marcos A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32599626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700999
_version_ 1783551901866917888
author Stamou, Sotiris C.
Conway, Brian D.
Nores, Marcos A.
author_facet Stamou, Sotiris C.
Conway, Brian D.
Nores, Marcos A.
author_sort Stamou, Sotiris C.
collection PubMed
description Background  Techniques to repair aortic pseudoaneurysms have been rapidly evolving. We present our results following open and endovascular repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms from 2009 to 2013. Methods  A total of nine patients underwent pseudoaneurysm repair from April 2009 to February 2013. Of them, five underwent open repair and four underwent endovascular repair. The median age was 58 years (range, 40–72 years) and two (22%) were females. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data are presented along with operative modality. Results  Two patients died during the period of study. Patient 1 died from massive hemorrhage at the site of prior stenting. Patient 7 died from postoperative cardiac arrest and respiratory failure. A single patient required hemorrhage-related reexploration. None of the patients experienced stroke or acute renal failure following repair. Median hospital and intensive care unit length of stays were 7.1 (range, 1–20) and 2.0 (range, 1–5), respectively. Conclusions  Pseudoaneurysm repair can be effectively achieved through open or percutaneous repair but only after careful consideration of anatomical constraints, as well as patient comorbidities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7324250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73242502020-07-01 Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies Stamou, Sotiris C. Conway, Brian D. Nores, Marcos A. Aorta (Stamford) Background  Techniques to repair aortic pseudoaneurysms have been rapidly evolving. We present our results following open and endovascular repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms from 2009 to 2013. Methods  A total of nine patients underwent pseudoaneurysm repair from April 2009 to February 2013. Of them, five underwent open repair and four underwent endovascular repair. The median age was 58 years (range, 40–72 years) and two (22%) were females. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data are presented along with operative modality. Results  Two patients died during the period of study. Patient 1 died from massive hemorrhage at the site of prior stenting. Patient 7 died from postoperative cardiac arrest and respiratory failure. A single patient required hemorrhage-related reexploration. None of the patients experienced stroke or acute renal failure following repair. Median hospital and intensive care unit length of stays were 7.1 (range, 1–20) and 2.0 (range, 1–5), respectively. Conclusions  Pseudoaneurysm repair can be effectively achieved through open or percutaneous repair but only after careful consideration of anatomical constraints, as well as patient comorbidities. Thieme Medical Publishers 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7324250/ /pubmed/32599626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700999 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Stamou, Sotiris C.
Conway, Brian D.
Nores, Marcos A.
Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies
title Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies
title_full Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies
title_fullStr Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies
title_full_unstemmed Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies
title_short Management of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms: Evolving Concepts and Controversies
title_sort management of aortic pseudoaneurysms: evolving concepts and controversies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32599626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700999
work_keys_str_mv AT stamousotirisc managementofaorticpseudoaneurysmsevolvingconceptsandcontroversies
AT conwaybriand managementofaorticpseudoaneurysmsevolvingconceptsandcontroversies
AT noresmarcosa managementofaorticpseudoaneurysmsevolvingconceptsandcontroversies