Cargando…
Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) is an essential component of the radiation oncology workflow. Commonly segmented thoracic OARs include the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and lungs. This study evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of these OARs. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12871 |
_version_ | 1783551993453740032 |
---|---|
author | Vu, Charles C. Siddiqui, Zaid A. Zamdborg, Leonid Thompson, Andrew B. Quinn, Thomas J. Castillo, Edward Guerrero, Thomas M. |
author_facet | Vu, Charles C. Siddiqui, Zaid A. Zamdborg, Leonid Thompson, Andrew B. Quinn, Thomas J. Castillo, Edward Guerrero, Thomas M. |
author_sort | Vu, Charles C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) is an essential component of the radiation oncology workflow. Commonly segmented thoracic OARs include the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and lungs. This study evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of these OARs. METHODS: The dataset was created retrospectively from consecutive radiotherapy plans containing all five OARs of interest, including 22,411 CT slices from 168 patients. Patients were divided into training, validation, and test datasets according to a 66%/17%/17% split. We trained a modified U‐Net, applying transfer learning from a VGG16 image classification model trained on ImageNet. The Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance on the test set for each organ was compared to a commercial atlas‐based segmentation model using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: On the test dataset, the median Dice coefficients for the CNN model vs. the multi‐atlas model were 71% vs. 67% for the spinal cord, 96% vs. 94% for the right lung, 96%vs. 94% for the left lung, 91% vs. 85% for the heart, and 63% vs. 37% for the esophagus. The median 95% Hausdorff distances were 9.5 mm vs. 25.3 mm, 5.1 mm vs. 8.1 mm, 4.0 mm vs. 8.0 mm, 9.8 mm vs. 15.8 mm, and 9.2 mm vs. 20.0 mm for the respective organs. The results all favored the CNN model (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 2D CNN can achieve superior results to commercial atlas‐based software for OAR segmentation utilizing non‐domain transfer learning, which has potential utility for quality assurance and expediting patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7324695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73246952020-07-01 Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning Vu, Charles C. Siddiqui, Zaid A. Zamdborg, Leonid Thompson, Andrew B. Quinn, Thomas J. Castillo, Edward Guerrero, Thomas M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) is an essential component of the radiation oncology workflow. Commonly segmented thoracic OARs include the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and lungs. This study evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of these OARs. METHODS: The dataset was created retrospectively from consecutive radiotherapy plans containing all five OARs of interest, including 22,411 CT slices from 168 patients. Patients were divided into training, validation, and test datasets according to a 66%/17%/17% split. We trained a modified U‐Net, applying transfer learning from a VGG16 image classification model trained on ImageNet. The Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance on the test set for each organ was compared to a commercial atlas‐based segmentation model using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: On the test dataset, the median Dice coefficients for the CNN model vs. the multi‐atlas model were 71% vs. 67% for the spinal cord, 96% vs. 94% for the right lung, 96%vs. 94% for the left lung, 91% vs. 85% for the heart, and 63% vs. 37% for the esophagus. The median 95% Hausdorff distances were 9.5 mm vs. 25.3 mm, 5.1 mm vs. 8.1 mm, 4.0 mm vs. 8.0 mm, 9.8 mm vs. 15.8 mm, and 9.2 mm vs. 20.0 mm for the respective organs. The results all favored the CNN model (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 2D CNN can achieve superior results to commercial atlas‐based software for OAR segmentation utilizing non‐domain transfer learning, which has potential utility for quality assurance and expediting patient care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7324695/ /pubmed/32602187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12871 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Vu, Charles C. Siddiqui, Zaid A. Zamdborg, Leonid Thompson, Andrew B. Quinn, Thomas J. Castillo, Edward Guerrero, Thomas M. Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
title | Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
title_full | Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
title_fullStr | Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
title_short | Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
title_sort | deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vucharlesc deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning AT siddiquizaida deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning AT zamdborgleonid deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning AT thompsonandrewb deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning AT quinnthomasj deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning AT castilloedward deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning AT guerrerothomasm deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning |