Cargando…

Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning

PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) is an essential component of the radiation oncology workflow. Commonly segmented thoracic OARs include the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and lungs. This study evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of these OARs. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vu, Charles C., Siddiqui, Zaid A., Zamdborg, Leonid, Thompson, Andrew B., Quinn, Thomas J., Castillo, Edward, Guerrero, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12871
_version_ 1783551993453740032
author Vu, Charles C.
Siddiqui, Zaid A.
Zamdborg, Leonid
Thompson, Andrew B.
Quinn, Thomas J.
Castillo, Edward
Guerrero, Thomas M.
author_facet Vu, Charles C.
Siddiqui, Zaid A.
Zamdborg, Leonid
Thompson, Andrew B.
Quinn, Thomas J.
Castillo, Edward
Guerrero, Thomas M.
author_sort Vu, Charles C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) is an essential component of the radiation oncology workflow. Commonly segmented thoracic OARs include the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and lungs. This study evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of these OARs. METHODS: The dataset was created retrospectively from consecutive radiotherapy plans containing all five OARs of interest, including 22,411 CT slices from 168 patients. Patients were divided into training, validation, and test datasets according to a 66%/17%/17% split. We trained a modified U‐Net, applying transfer learning from a VGG16 image classification model trained on ImageNet. The Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance on the test set for each organ was compared to a commercial atlas‐based segmentation model using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: On the test dataset, the median Dice coefficients for the CNN model vs. the multi‐atlas model were 71% vs. 67% for the spinal cord, 96% vs. 94% for the right lung, 96%vs. 94% for the left lung, 91% vs. 85% for the heart, and 63% vs. 37% for the esophagus. The median 95% Hausdorff distances were 9.5  mm vs. 25.3 mm, 5.1  mm vs. 8.1 mm, 4.0  mm vs. 8.0 mm, 9.8  mm vs. 15.8 mm, and 9.2 mm vs. 20.0 mm for the respective organs. The results all favored the CNN model (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 2D CNN can achieve superior results to commercial atlas‐based software for OAR segmentation utilizing non‐domain transfer learning, which has potential utility for quality assurance and expediting patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7324695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73246952020-07-01 Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning Vu, Charles C. Siddiqui, Zaid A. Zamdborg, Leonid Thompson, Andrew B. Quinn, Thomas J. Castillo, Edward Guerrero, Thomas M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Segmentation of organs‐at‐risk (OARs) is an essential component of the radiation oncology workflow. Commonly segmented thoracic OARs include the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and lungs. This study evaluated a convolutional neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of these OARs. METHODS: The dataset was created retrospectively from consecutive radiotherapy plans containing all five OARs of interest, including 22,411 CT slices from 168 patients. Patients were divided into training, validation, and test datasets according to a 66%/17%/17% split. We trained a modified U‐Net, applying transfer learning from a VGG16 image classification model trained on ImageNet. The Dice coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance on the test set for each organ was compared to a commercial atlas‐based segmentation model using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: On the test dataset, the median Dice coefficients for the CNN model vs. the multi‐atlas model were 71% vs. 67% for the spinal cord, 96% vs. 94% for the right lung, 96%vs. 94% for the left lung, 91% vs. 85% for the heart, and 63% vs. 37% for the esophagus. The median 95% Hausdorff distances were 9.5  mm vs. 25.3 mm, 5.1  mm vs. 8.1 mm, 4.0  mm vs. 8.0 mm, 9.8  mm vs. 15.8 mm, and 9.2 mm vs. 20.0 mm for the respective organs. The results all favored the CNN model (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A 2D CNN can achieve superior results to commercial atlas‐based software for OAR segmentation utilizing non‐domain transfer learning, which has potential utility for quality assurance and expediting patient care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7324695/ /pubmed/32602187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12871 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Vu, Charles C.
Siddiqui, Zaid A.
Zamdborg, Leonid
Thompson, Andrew B.
Quinn, Thomas J.
Castillo, Edward
Guerrero, Thomas M.
Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
title Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
title_full Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
title_fullStr Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
title_full_unstemmed Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
title_short Deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
title_sort deep convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of thoracic organs‐at‐risk in radiation oncology – use of non‐domain transfer learning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32602187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12871
work_keys_str_mv AT vucharlesc deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning
AT siddiquizaida deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning
AT zamdborgleonid deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning
AT thompsonandrewb deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning
AT quinnthomasj deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning
AT castilloedward deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning
AT guerrerothomasm deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomaticsegmentationofthoracicorgansatriskinradiationoncologyuseofnondomaintransferlearning