Cargando…
Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a robust template for VMAT SBRT of lung lesions, using the multicriterial optimization (MCO) of a commercial treatment planning system. METHODS: The template was established and refined on 10 lung SBRT patients planned for 55 Gy/5 fr. To improve gradient and conformi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32275353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12872 |
_version_ | 1783551995532017664 |
---|---|
author | Marrazzo, Livia Arilli, Chiara Pellegrini, Roberto Bonomo, Pierluigi Calusi, Silvia Talamonti, Cinzia Casati, Marta Compagnucci, Antonella Livi, Lorenzo Pallotta, Stefania |
author_facet | Marrazzo, Livia Arilli, Chiara Pellegrini, Roberto Bonomo, Pierluigi Calusi, Silvia Talamonti, Cinzia Casati, Marta Compagnucci, Antonella Livi, Lorenzo Pallotta, Stefania |
author_sort | Marrazzo, Livia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop and validate a robust template for VMAT SBRT of lung lesions, using the multicriterial optimization (MCO) of a commercial treatment planning system. METHODS: The template was established and refined on 10 lung SBRT patients planned for 55 Gy/5 fr. To improve gradient and conformity a ring structure around the planning target volume (PTV) was set in the list of objectives. Ideal fluence optimization was conducted giving priority to organs at risk (OARs) and using the MCO, which further pushes OARs doses. Segmentation was conducted giving priority to PTV coverage. Two different templates were produced with different degrees of modulation, by setting the Fluence Smoothing parameter to Medium (MFS) and High (HFS). Each template was applied on 20 further patients. Automatic and manual plans were compared in terms of dosimetric parameters, delivery time, and complexity. Statistical significance of differences was evaluated using paired two‐sided Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in PTV coverage and maximum dose were observed, while an improvement was observed in gradient and conformity. A general improvement in dose to OARs was seen, which resulted to be significant for chest wall V(30 Gy), total lung V(20 Gy), and spinal cord D(0.1 cc). MFS plans are characterized by a higher modulation and longer delivery time than manual plans. HFS plans have a modulation and a delivery time comparable to manual plans, but still present an advantage in terms of gradient. CONCLUSION: The automation of the planning process for lung SBRT using robust templates and MCO was demonstrated to be feasible and more efficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7324702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73247022020-07-01 Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions Marrazzo, Livia Arilli, Chiara Pellegrini, Roberto Bonomo, Pierluigi Calusi, Silvia Talamonti, Cinzia Casati, Marta Compagnucci, Antonella Livi, Lorenzo Pallotta, Stefania J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To develop and validate a robust template for VMAT SBRT of lung lesions, using the multicriterial optimization (MCO) of a commercial treatment planning system. METHODS: The template was established and refined on 10 lung SBRT patients planned for 55 Gy/5 fr. To improve gradient and conformity a ring structure around the planning target volume (PTV) was set in the list of objectives. Ideal fluence optimization was conducted giving priority to organs at risk (OARs) and using the MCO, which further pushes OARs doses. Segmentation was conducted giving priority to PTV coverage. Two different templates were produced with different degrees of modulation, by setting the Fluence Smoothing parameter to Medium (MFS) and High (HFS). Each template was applied on 20 further patients. Automatic and manual plans were compared in terms of dosimetric parameters, delivery time, and complexity. Statistical significance of differences was evaluated using paired two‐sided Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in PTV coverage and maximum dose were observed, while an improvement was observed in gradient and conformity. A general improvement in dose to OARs was seen, which resulted to be significant for chest wall V(30 Gy), total lung V(20 Gy), and spinal cord D(0.1 cc). MFS plans are characterized by a higher modulation and longer delivery time than manual plans. HFS plans have a modulation and a delivery time comparable to manual plans, but still present an advantage in terms of gradient. CONCLUSION: The automation of the planning process for lung SBRT using robust templates and MCO was demonstrated to be feasible and more efficient. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7324702/ /pubmed/32275353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12872 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Marrazzo, Livia Arilli, Chiara Pellegrini, Roberto Bonomo, Pierluigi Calusi, Silvia Talamonti, Cinzia Casati, Marta Compagnucci, Antonella Livi, Lorenzo Pallotta, Stefania Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions |
title | Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions |
title_full | Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions |
title_fullStr | Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions |
title_short | Automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung VMAT SBRT of lung lesions |
title_sort | automated planning through robust templates and multicriterial optimization for lung vmat sbrt of lung lesions |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32275353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marrazzolivia automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT arillichiara automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT pellegriniroberto automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT bonomopierluigi automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT calusisilvia automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT talamonticinzia automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT casatimarta automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT compagnucciantonella automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT livilorenzo automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions AT pallottastefania automatedplanningthroughrobusttemplatesandmulticriterialoptimizationforlungvmatsbrtoflunglesions |