Cargando…

Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy

PURPOSE: To characterize key plan quality metrics in multi‐target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans treated using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in comparison to dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans treating single target. To investigate the feasibility of quality improvem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Yunfeng, Gao, Hao, Zhang, Jiahan, Kirkpatrick, John P., Yin, Fang‐Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12869
_version_ 1783551995772141568
author Cui, Yunfeng
Gao, Hao
Zhang, Jiahan
Kirkpatrick, John P.
Yin, Fang‐Fang
author_facet Cui, Yunfeng
Gao, Hao
Zhang, Jiahan
Kirkpatrick, John P.
Yin, Fang‐Fang
author_sort Cui, Yunfeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize key plan quality metrics in multi‐target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans treated using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in comparison to dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans treating single target. To investigate the feasibility of quality improvement in VMAT planning based on previous planning knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 97 VMAT plans of multi‐target and 156 DCA plans of single‐target treated in 2017 at a single institution were reviewed. A total of 605 targets were treated with these SRS plans. The prescription dose was normalized to 20 Gy in all plans for this analysis. Two plan quality metrics, target conformity index (CI) and normal tissue volume receiving more than 12 Gy (V12Gy), were calculated for each target. The distribution of V12Gy per target was plotted as a function of the target volume. For multi‐target VMAT plans, the number of targets being treated in the same plan and the distance between targets were calculated to evaluate their impact on V12Gy. VMAT plans that had a large deviation of V12Gy from the average level were re‐optimized to determine the possibility of reducing the variation of V12Gy in VMAT planning. RESULTS: Conformity index of multi‐target VMAT plans were lower than that of DCA plans while the mean values of 12 Gy were comparable. The V12Gy for a target in VMAT plan did not show apparent dependence on the total number of targets or the distance between targets. The distribution of V12Gy exhibited a larger variation in VMAT plans compared to DCA plans. Re‐optimization of outlier plans reduced V12 Gy by 33.9% and resulted in the V12Gy distribution in VMAT plans more closely resembling that of DCA plans. CONCLUSION: The benchmark data on key plan quality metrics were established for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS planning. It is feasible to use this knowledge to guide VMAT planning and reduce high V12Gy outliers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7324703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73247032020-07-01 Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy Cui, Yunfeng Gao, Hao Zhang, Jiahan Kirkpatrick, John P. Yin, Fang‐Fang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To characterize key plan quality metrics in multi‐target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plans treated using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in comparison to dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans treating single target. To investigate the feasibility of quality improvement in VMAT planning based on previous planning knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 97 VMAT plans of multi‐target and 156 DCA plans of single‐target treated in 2017 at a single institution were reviewed. A total of 605 targets were treated with these SRS plans. The prescription dose was normalized to 20 Gy in all plans for this analysis. Two plan quality metrics, target conformity index (CI) and normal tissue volume receiving more than 12 Gy (V12Gy), were calculated for each target. The distribution of V12Gy per target was plotted as a function of the target volume. For multi‐target VMAT plans, the number of targets being treated in the same plan and the distance between targets were calculated to evaluate their impact on V12Gy. VMAT plans that had a large deviation of V12Gy from the average level were re‐optimized to determine the possibility of reducing the variation of V12Gy in VMAT planning. RESULTS: Conformity index of multi‐target VMAT plans were lower than that of DCA plans while the mean values of 12 Gy were comparable. The V12Gy for a target in VMAT plan did not show apparent dependence on the total number of targets or the distance between targets. The distribution of V12Gy exhibited a larger variation in VMAT plans compared to DCA plans. Re‐optimization of outlier plans reduced V12 Gy by 33.9% and resulted in the V12Gy distribution in VMAT plans more closely resembling that of DCA plans. CONCLUSION: The benchmark data on key plan quality metrics were established for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS planning. It is feasible to use this knowledge to guide VMAT planning and reduce high V12Gy outliers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7324703/ /pubmed/32239746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12869 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Cui, Yunfeng
Gao, Hao
Zhang, Jiahan
Kirkpatrick, John P.
Yin, Fang‐Fang
Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
title Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_full Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_fullStr Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_short Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_sort retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12869
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiyunfeng retrospectivequalitymetricsreviewofstereotacticradiosurgeryplanstreatingmultipletargetsusingsingleisocentervolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT gaohao retrospectivequalitymetricsreviewofstereotacticradiosurgeryplanstreatingmultipletargetsusingsingleisocentervolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT zhangjiahan retrospectivequalitymetricsreviewofstereotacticradiosurgeryplanstreatingmultipletargetsusingsingleisocentervolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT kirkpatrickjohnp retrospectivequalitymetricsreviewofstereotacticradiosurgeryplanstreatingmultipletargetsusingsingleisocentervolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT yinfangfang retrospectivequalitymetricsreviewofstereotacticradiosurgeryplanstreatingmultipletargetsusingsingleisocentervolumetricmodulatedarctherapy