Cargando…

Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase

Due to animal welfare issues, European Union has banned the use of conventional cages (CC) and non-EU countries including the US are also under constant public pressure to restrict their use in egg production. Very limited information is available on the composition of the microbial community of hen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adhikari, Bishnu, Jun, Se-Ran, Kwon, Young M., Kiess, Aaron S., Adhikari, Pratima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00331
_version_ 1783552021349007360
author Adhikari, Bishnu
Jun, Se-Ran
Kwon, Young M.
Kiess, Aaron S.
Adhikari, Pratima
author_facet Adhikari, Bishnu
Jun, Se-Ran
Kwon, Young M.
Kiess, Aaron S.
Adhikari, Pratima
author_sort Adhikari, Bishnu
collection PubMed
description Due to animal welfare issues, European Union has banned the use of conventional cages (CC) and non-EU countries including the US are also under constant public pressure to restrict their use in egg production. Very limited information is available on the composition of the microbial community of hens raised in different housing environments. This study was conducted to determine the effects of CC and enriched colony cages (EC) on cecal microbiota of two commercial laying hen strains, Hy-Line W36 (W36) and Hy-Line Brown (HB) during the late production stage (53, 58, 67, and 72 weeks of age). Cecal microbiota was studied by analyzing 16S rRNA gene sequences with Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) 2 ver. 2018.8. Differentially abundant taxa were identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 2.0). At phylum level, Actinobacteria was significantly enriched in W36 at all time points while Synergistetes (53 weeks), Spirochaetes (58 weeks), and Synergistetes and Spirochaetes (67 weeks) were significantly higher in HB. At genus level, Bifidobacterium (at all time points) and butyric acid producing genera such as Butyricicoccus and Subdoligranulum (58 and 72 weeks) were significantly higher in W36 as compared to HB. Moreover, Proteobacteria (72 weeks) and its associated genus Campylobacter (67 and 72 weeks) were significantly enriched in EC as compared to CC. Alpha diversity was significantly higher in HB (at all time points) and in EC (67 weeks) as compared to W36 and CC, respectively. Similarly, there was a significant difference in community structure (beta diversity) between W36 and HB (all time points) as well as between EC and CC (67 weeks). The effect of housing and strains was not only seen at the bacterial composition and structure but also reflected at their functional level. Notably, KEGG metabolic pathways predicted to be involved in carbohydrates degradation and amino acids biosynthesis by PICRUSt analysis were significantly different between W36 and HB housed at CC and EC. In sum, cecal microbiota composition, diversities, and their functional pathways were affected by housing type which further varied between two commercial laying hen strains, HB and W36. This suggests that both housing and genetic strains of laying hens should be considered for selection of the alternative housing systems such as enriched colony cage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7324799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73247992020-07-10 Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase Adhikari, Bishnu Jun, Se-Ran Kwon, Young M. Kiess, Aaron S. Adhikari, Pratima Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Due to animal welfare issues, European Union has banned the use of conventional cages (CC) and non-EU countries including the US are also under constant public pressure to restrict their use in egg production. Very limited information is available on the composition of the microbial community of hens raised in different housing environments. This study was conducted to determine the effects of CC and enriched colony cages (EC) on cecal microbiota of two commercial laying hen strains, Hy-Line W36 (W36) and Hy-Line Brown (HB) during the late production stage (53, 58, 67, and 72 weeks of age). Cecal microbiota was studied by analyzing 16S rRNA gene sequences with Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) 2 ver. 2018.8. Differentially abundant taxa were identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 2.0). At phylum level, Actinobacteria was significantly enriched in W36 at all time points while Synergistetes (53 weeks), Spirochaetes (58 weeks), and Synergistetes and Spirochaetes (67 weeks) were significantly higher in HB. At genus level, Bifidobacterium (at all time points) and butyric acid producing genera such as Butyricicoccus and Subdoligranulum (58 and 72 weeks) were significantly higher in W36 as compared to HB. Moreover, Proteobacteria (72 weeks) and its associated genus Campylobacter (67 and 72 weeks) were significantly enriched in EC as compared to CC. Alpha diversity was significantly higher in HB (at all time points) and in EC (67 weeks) as compared to W36 and CC, respectively. Similarly, there was a significant difference in community structure (beta diversity) between W36 and HB (all time points) as well as between EC and CC (67 weeks). The effect of housing and strains was not only seen at the bacterial composition and structure but also reflected at their functional level. Notably, KEGG metabolic pathways predicted to be involved in carbohydrates degradation and amino acids biosynthesis by PICRUSt analysis were significantly different between W36 and HB housed at CC and EC. In sum, cecal microbiota composition, diversities, and their functional pathways were affected by housing type which further varied between two commercial laying hen strains, HB and W36. This suggests that both housing and genetic strains of laying hens should be considered for selection of the alternative housing systems such as enriched colony cage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7324799/ /pubmed/32656252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00331 Text en Copyright © 2020 Adhikari, Jun, Kwon, Kiess and Adhikari. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Adhikari, Bishnu
Jun, Se-Ran
Kwon, Young M.
Kiess, Aaron S.
Adhikari, Pratima
Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase
title Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase
title_full Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase
title_fullStr Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase
title_short Effects of Housing Types on Cecal Microbiota of Two Different Strains of Laying Hens During the Late Production Phase
title_sort effects of housing types on cecal microbiota of two different strains of laying hens during the late production phase
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7324799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00331
work_keys_str_mv AT adhikaribishnu effectsofhousingtypesoncecalmicrobiotaoftwodifferentstrainsoflayinghensduringthelateproductionphase
AT junseran effectsofhousingtypesoncecalmicrobiotaoftwodifferentstrainsoflayinghensduringthelateproductionphase
AT kwonyoungm effectsofhousingtypesoncecalmicrobiotaoftwodifferentstrainsoflayinghensduringthelateproductionphase
AT kiessaarons effectsofhousingtypesoncecalmicrobiotaoftwodifferentstrainsoflayinghensduringthelateproductionphase
AT adhikaripratima effectsofhousingtypesoncecalmicrobiotaoftwodifferentstrainsoflayinghensduringthelateproductionphase