Cargando…

Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia

BACKGROUND: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe mode of birth for most women but internationally VBAC rates remain low. In Australia women planning a VBAC may experience different models of care including continuity of care (CoC). There are a limited number of studies exploring the impact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keedle, Hazel, Peters, Lilian, Schmied, Virginia, Burns, Elaine, Keedle, Warren, Dahlen, Hannah Grace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03075-8
_version_ 1783552076792463360
author Keedle, Hazel
Peters, Lilian
Schmied, Virginia
Burns, Elaine
Keedle, Warren
Dahlen, Hannah Grace
author_facet Keedle, Hazel
Peters, Lilian
Schmied, Virginia
Burns, Elaine
Keedle, Warren
Dahlen, Hannah Grace
author_sort Keedle, Hazel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe mode of birth for most women but internationally VBAC rates remain low. In Australia women planning a VBAC may experience different models of care including continuity of care (CoC). There are a limited number of studies exploring the impact and influence of CoC on women’s experiences of planning a VBAC. Continuity of care (CoC) with a midwife has been found to increase spontaneous vaginal birth and decrease some interventions. Women planning a VBAC prefer and benefit from CoC with a known care provider. This study aimed to explore the influence, and impact, of continuity of care on women’s experiences when planning a VBAC in Australia. METHODS: The Australian VBAC survey was designed and distributed via social media. Outcomes and experiences of women who had planned a VBAC in the past 5 years were compared by model of care. Standard fragmented maternity care was compared to continuity of care with a midwife or doctor. RESULTS: In total, 490 women completed the survey and respondents came from every State and Territory in Australia. Women who had CoC with a midwife were more likely to feel in control of their decision making and feel their health care provider positively supported their decision to have a VBAC. Women who had CoC with a midwife were more likely to have been active in labour, experience water immersion and have an upright birthing position. Women who received fragmented care experienced lower autonomy and lower respect compared to CoC. CONCLUSION: This study recruited a non-probability based, self-selected, sample of women using social media. Women found having a VBAC less traumatic than their previous caesarean and women planning a VBAC benefited from CoC models, particularly midwifery continuity of care. Women seeking VBAC are often excluded from these models as they are considered to have risk factors. There needs to be a focus on increasing shared belief and confidence in VBAC across professions and an expansion of midwifery led continuity of care models for women seeking a VBAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7325036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73250362020-06-30 Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia Keedle, Hazel Peters, Lilian Schmied, Virginia Burns, Elaine Keedle, Warren Dahlen, Hannah Grace BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe mode of birth for most women but internationally VBAC rates remain low. In Australia women planning a VBAC may experience different models of care including continuity of care (CoC). There are a limited number of studies exploring the impact and influence of CoC on women’s experiences of planning a VBAC. Continuity of care (CoC) with a midwife has been found to increase spontaneous vaginal birth and decrease some interventions. Women planning a VBAC prefer and benefit from CoC with a known care provider. This study aimed to explore the influence, and impact, of continuity of care on women’s experiences when planning a VBAC in Australia. METHODS: The Australian VBAC survey was designed and distributed via social media. Outcomes and experiences of women who had planned a VBAC in the past 5 years were compared by model of care. Standard fragmented maternity care was compared to continuity of care with a midwife or doctor. RESULTS: In total, 490 women completed the survey and respondents came from every State and Territory in Australia. Women who had CoC with a midwife were more likely to feel in control of their decision making and feel their health care provider positively supported their decision to have a VBAC. Women who had CoC with a midwife were more likely to have been active in labour, experience water immersion and have an upright birthing position. Women who received fragmented care experienced lower autonomy and lower respect compared to CoC. CONCLUSION: This study recruited a non-probability based, self-selected, sample of women using social media. Women found having a VBAC less traumatic than their previous caesarean and women planning a VBAC benefited from CoC models, particularly midwifery continuity of care. Women seeking VBAC are often excluded from these models as they are considered to have risk factors. There needs to be a focus on increasing shared belief and confidence in VBAC across professions and an expansion of midwifery led continuity of care models for women seeking a VBAC. BioMed Central 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7325036/ /pubmed/32605586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03075-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Keedle, Hazel
Peters, Lilian
Schmied, Virginia
Burns, Elaine
Keedle, Warren
Dahlen, Hannah Grace
Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia
title Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia
title_full Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia
title_fullStr Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia
title_short Women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia
title_sort women’s experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03075-8
work_keys_str_mv AT keedlehazel womensexperiencesofplanningavaginalbirthaftercaesareanindifferentmodelsofmaternitycareinaustralia
AT peterslilian womensexperiencesofplanningavaginalbirthaftercaesareanindifferentmodelsofmaternitycareinaustralia
AT schmiedvirginia womensexperiencesofplanningavaginalbirthaftercaesareanindifferentmodelsofmaternitycareinaustralia
AT burnselaine womensexperiencesofplanningavaginalbirthaftercaesareanindifferentmodelsofmaternitycareinaustralia
AT keedlewarren womensexperiencesofplanningavaginalbirthaftercaesareanindifferentmodelsofmaternitycareinaustralia
AT dahlenhannahgrace womensexperiencesofplanningavaginalbirthaftercaesareanindifferentmodelsofmaternitycareinaustralia