Cargando…
Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model
BACKGROUND: Owing to migration, female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) has become a growing concern in host countries in which FGM/C is not familiar. There is a need for reliable estimates of FGM/C prevalence to inform medical and public health policy. We aimed to advance methodology for estim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32600380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09151-0 |
_version_ | 1783552094229233664 |
---|---|
author | Kawous, Ramin van den Muijsenbergh, Maria E. T. C. Geraci, Diana Hendriks, Kyra R. M. Ortensi, Livia E. Hilverda, Femke Burdorf, Alex |
author_facet | Kawous, Ramin van den Muijsenbergh, Maria E. T. C. Geraci, Diana Hendriks, Kyra R. M. Ortensi, Livia E. Hilverda, Femke Burdorf, Alex |
author_sort | Kawous, Ramin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Owing to migration, female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) has become a growing concern in host countries in which FGM/C is not familiar. There is a need for reliable estimates of FGM/C prevalence to inform medical and public health policy. We aimed to advance methodology for estimating the prevalence of FGM/C in diaspora by determining the prevalence of FGM/C among women giving birth in the Netherlands. METHODS: Two methods were applied to estimate the prevalence of FGM/C in women giving birth: (I) direct estimation of FGM/C was performed through a nationwide survey of all midwifery practices in the Netherlands and (II) the extrapolation model was adopted for indirect estimation of FGM/C, by applying population-based-survey data on FGM/C in country of origin to migrant women who gave birth in 2018 in the Netherlands. RESULTS: A nationwide survey among primary care midwifery practices that provided care for 57.5% of all deliveries in 2018 in the Netherlands, reported 523 cases of FGM/C, constituting FGM/C prevalence of 0.54%. The indirect estimation of FGM/C in an extrapolation-model resulted in an estimated prevalence of 1.55%. Possible reasons for the difference in FGM/C prevalence between direct- and indirect estimation include that the midwives were not being able to recognize, record or classify FGM/C, referral to an obstetrician before assessing FGM/C status of women and selective responding to the survey. Also, migrants might differ from people in their country of origin in terms of acculturation toward discontinuation of the practice. This may have contributed to the higher indirect-estimation of FGM/C compared to direct estimation of FGM/C. CONCLUSIONS: The current study has provided insight into direct estimation of FGM/C through a survey of midwifery practices in the Netherlands. Evidence based on midwifery practices data can be regarded as a minimum benchmark for actual prevalence among the subpopulation of women who gave birth in a given year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7325136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73251362020-06-30 Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model Kawous, Ramin van den Muijsenbergh, Maria E. T. C. Geraci, Diana Hendriks, Kyra R. M. Ortensi, Livia E. Hilverda, Femke Burdorf, Alex BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Owing to migration, female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) has become a growing concern in host countries in which FGM/C is not familiar. There is a need for reliable estimates of FGM/C prevalence to inform medical and public health policy. We aimed to advance methodology for estimating the prevalence of FGM/C in diaspora by determining the prevalence of FGM/C among women giving birth in the Netherlands. METHODS: Two methods were applied to estimate the prevalence of FGM/C in women giving birth: (I) direct estimation of FGM/C was performed through a nationwide survey of all midwifery practices in the Netherlands and (II) the extrapolation model was adopted for indirect estimation of FGM/C, by applying population-based-survey data on FGM/C in country of origin to migrant women who gave birth in 2018 in the Netherlands. RESULTS: A nationwide survey among primary care midwifery practices that provided care for 57.5% of all deliveries in 2018 in the Netherlands, reported 523 cases of FGM/C, constituting FGM/C prevalence of 0.54%. The indirect estimation of FGM/C in an extrapolation-model resulted in an estimated prevalence of 1.55%. Possible reasons for the difference in FGM/C prevalence between direct- and indirect estimation include that the midwives were not being able to recognize, record or classify FGM/C, referral to an obstetrician before assessing FGM/C status of women and selective responding to the survey. Also, migrants might differ from people in their country of origin in terms of acculturation toward discontinuation of the practice. This may have contributed to the higher indirect-estimation of FGM/C compared to direct estimation of FGM/C. CONCLUSIONS: The current study has provided insight into direct estimation of FGM/C through a survey of midwifery practices in the Netherlands. Evidence based on midwifery practices data can be regarded as a minimum benchmark for actual prevalence among the subpopulation of women who gave birth in a given year. BioMed Central 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7325136/ /pubmed/32600380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09151-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kawous, Ramin van den Muijsenbergh, Maria E. T. C. Geraci, Diana Hendriks, Kyra R. M. Ortensi, Livia E. Hilverda, Femke Burdorf, Alex Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
title | Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
title_full | Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
title_fullStr | Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
title_short | Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
title_sort | estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32600380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09151-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawousramin estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel AT vandenmuijsenberghmariaetc estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel AT geracidiana estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel AT hendrikskyrarm estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel AT ortensiliviae estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel AT hilverdafemke estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel AT burdorfalex estimatesoffemalegenitalmutilationcuttinginthenetherlandsacomparisonbetweenanationwidesurveyinmidwiferypracticesandextrapolationmodel |