Cargando…

Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Text messaging systems are used to collect data on symptom prevalence. Using a text messaging system, we evaluated the effects of question load, question frequency, and financial incentive on response rates and reported infant diarrhoea rates in an infant diarrhoea survey. METHODS: We pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rego, Ryan, Watson, Samuel, Ishengoma, Philbert, Langat, Philemon, Otieno, Hezekiah Pireh, Lilford, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01062-3
_version_ 1783552098442412032
author Rego, Ryan
Watson, Samuel
Ishengoma, Philbert
Langat, Philemon
Otieno, Hezekiah Pireh
Lilford, Richard
author_facet Rego, Ryan
Watson, Samuel
Ishengoma, Philbert
Langat, Philemon
Otieno, Hezekiah Pireh
Lilford, Richard
author_sort Rego, Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Text messaging systems are used to collect data on symptom prevalence. Using a text messaging system, we evaluated the effects of question load, question frequency, and financial incentive on response rates and reported infant diarrhoea rates in an infant diarrhoea survey. METHODS: We performed a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial of an SMS surveying system for infant diarrhoea surveillance with treatments: financial incentive (yes/no), question load (1-question/3-question), and questioning frequency (daily/fortnightly). Participants progressed through all treatment combinations over eight two-week rounds. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions to determine the impacts of the treatments on the response rates and reported diarrhoea rates. Attitudes were explored through qualitative interviews. RESULTS: For the 141 participants, the mean response rate was 47%. In terms of percentage point differences (ppd), daily questioning was associated with a lower response rate than fortnightly (− 1·2[95%CI:-4·9,2·5]); high (3-question) question loads were associated with a lower response rate than low (1-question) question loads (− 7·0[95%CI:− 10·8,-3·1]); and financial incentivisation was associated with a higher response rate than no financial incentivisation (6·4[95%CI:2·6,10·2]). The mean two-week diarrhoea rate was 36·4%. Daily questioning was associated with a higher reported diarrhoea rate than fortnightly (29·9[95%CI:22·8,36·9]); with little evidence for impact by incentivisation or question load. CONCLUSIONS: Close to half of all participants responded to the SMS survey. Daily questioning evoked a statistically higher rate of reported diarrhoea, while financial incentivisation and low (1-question) question loads evoked higher response rates than no incentive and high (3-question) question loads respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was prospectively registered on ISRCTN on the 20th of March 2019 under number ISRCTN11410773.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7325153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73251532020-06-30 Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial Rego, Ryan Watson, Samuel Ishengoma, Philbert Langat, Philemon Otieno, Hezekiah Pireh Lilford, Richard BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Text messaging systems are used to collect data on symptom prevalence. Using a text messaging system, we evaluated the effects of question load, question frequency, and financial incentive on response rates and reported infant diarrhoea rates in an infant diarrhoea survey. METHODS: We performed a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial of an SMS surveying system for infant diarrhoea surveillance with treatments: financial incentive (yes/no), question load (1-question/3-question), and questioning frequency (daily/fortnightly). Participants progressed through all treatment combinations over eight two-week rounds. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions to determine the impacts of the treatments on the response rates and reported diarrhoea rates. Attitudes were explored through qualitative interviews. RESULTS: For the 141 participants, the mean response rate was 47%. In terms of percentage point differences (ppd), daily questioning was associated with a lower response rate than fortnightly (− 1·2[95%CI:-4·9,2·5]); high (3-question) question loads were associated with a lower response rate than low (1-question) question loads (− 7·0[95%CI:− 10·8,-3·1]); and financial incentivisation was associated with a higher response rate than no financial incentivisation (6·4[95%CI:2·6,10·2]). The mean two-week diarrhoea rate was 36·4%. Daily questioning was associated with a higher reported diarrhoea rate than fortnightly (29·9[95%CI:22·8,36·9]); with little evidence for impact by incentivisation or question load. CONCLUSIONS: Close to half of all participants responded to the SMS survey. Daily questioning evoked a statistically higher rate of reported diarrhoea, while financial incentivisation and low (1-question) question loads evoked higher response rates than no incentive and high (3-question) question loads respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was prospectively registered on ISRCTN on the 20th of March 2019 under number ISRCTN11410773. BioMed Central 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7325153/ /pubmed/32605536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01062-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rego, Ryan
Watson, Samuel
Ishengoma, Philbert
Langat, Philemon
Otieno, Hezekiah Pireh
Lilford, Richard
Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of SMS messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of sms messaging for diarrhoea measurement: a factorial cross-over randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01062-3
work_keys_str_mv AT regoryan effectivenessofsmsmessagingfordiarrhoeameasurementafactorialcrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watsonsamuel effectivenessofsmsmessagingfordiarrhoeameasurementafactorialcrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ishengomaphilbert effectivenessofsmsmessagingfordiarrhoeameasurementafactorialcrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT langatphilemon effectivenessofsmsmessagingfordiarrhoeameasurementafactorialcrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT otienohezekiahpireh effectivenessofsmsmessagingfordiarrhoeameasurementafactorialcrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lilfordrichard effectivenessofsmsmessagingfordiarrhoeameasurementafactorialcrossoverrandomisedcontrolledtrial