Cargando…

An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis

Porphyromonas gingivalis has been linked to the development and progression of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and is considered to be a high-risk factor for ESCC. Currently, the commonly used methods for P. gingivalis detection are culture or DNA extraction-based, which are either time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, B. L., Qi, Y. J., Kong, J. Y., Li, Z. T., Wang, J. P., Yuan, X., Gao, S. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32418555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001053
_version_ 1783552129075511296
author Gu, B. L.
Qi, Y. J.
Kong, J. Y.
Li, Z. T.
Wang, J. P.
Yuan, X.
Gao, S. G.
author_facet Gu, B. L.
Qi, Y. J.
Kong, J. Y.
Li, Z. T.
Wang, J. P.
Yuan, X.
Gao, S. G.
author_sort Gu, B. L.
collection PubMed
description Porphyromonas gingivalis has been linked to the development and progression of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and is considered to be a high-risk factor for ESCC. Currently, the commonly used methods for P. gingivalis detection are culture or DNA extraction-based, which are either time and labour intensive especially for high-throughput applications. We aimed to establish and evaluate a rapid and sensitive direct quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol for the detection of P. gingivalis without DNA extraction which is suitable for large-scale epidemiological studies. Paired gingival swab samples from 192 subjects undergoing general medical examinations were analysed using two direct and one extraction-based qPCR assays for P. gingivalis. Tris-EDTA buffer-based direct qPCR (TE-direct qPCR), lysis-based direct qPCR (lysis-direct qPCR) and DNA extraction-based qPCR (kit-qPCR) were used, respectively, in 192, 132 and 60 of these samples for quantification of P. gingivalis. The sensitivity and specificity of TE-direct qPCR was 95.24% and 100% compared with lysis-direct qPCR, which was 100% and 97.30% when compared with kit-qPCR; TE-direct qPCR had an almost perfect agreement with lysis-direct qPCR (κ = 0.954) and kit-qPCR (κ = 0.965). Moreover, the assay time used for TE-direct qPCR was 1.5 h. In conclusion, the TE-direct qPCR assay is a simple and efficient method for the quantification of oral P. gingivalis and showed high sensitivity and specificity compared with routine qPCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7325331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73253312020-07-08 An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis Gu, B. L. Qi, Y. J. Kong, J. Y. Li, Z. T. Wang, J. P. Yuan, X. Gao, S. G. Epidemiol Infect Short Paper Porphyromonas gingivalis has been linked to the development and progression of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and is considered to be a high-risk factor for ESCC. Currently, the commonly used methods for P. gingivalis detection are culture or DNA extraction-based, which are either time and labour intensive especially for high-throughput applications. We aimed to establish and evaluate a rapid and sensitive direct quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) protocol for the detection of P. gingivalis without DNA extraction which is suitable for large-scale epidemiological studies. Paired gingival swab samples from 192 subjects undergoing general medical examinations were analysed using two direct and one extraction-based qPCR assays for P. gingivalis. Tris-EDTA buffer-based direct qPCR (TE-direct qPCR), lysis-based direct qPCR (lysis-direct qPCR) and DNA extraction-based qPCR (kit-qPCR) were used, respectively, in 192, 132 and 60 of these samples for quantification of P. gingivalis. The sensitivity and specificity of TE-direct qPCR was 95.24% and 100% compared with lysis-direct qPCR, which was 100% and 97.30% when compared with kit-qPCR; TE-direct qPCR had an almost perfect agreement with lysis-direct qPCR (κ = 0.954) and kit-qPCR (κ = 0.965). Moreover, the assay time used for TE-direct qPCR was 1.5 h. In conclusion, the TE-direct qPCR assay is a simple and efficient method for the quantification of oral P. gingivalis and showed high sensitivity and specificity compared with routine qPCR. Cambridge University Press 2020-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7325331/ /pubmed/32418555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001053 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Paper
Gu, B. L.
Qi, Y. J.
Kong, J. Y.
Li, Z. T.
Wang, J. P.
Yuan, X.
Gao, S. G.
An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis
title An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis
title_full An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis
title_fullStr An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis
title_short An evaluation of direct PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis
title_sort evaluation of direct pcr assays for the detection and quantification of porphyromonas gingivalis
topic Short Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32418555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001053
work_keys_str_mv AT gubl anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT qiyj anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT kongjy anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT lizt anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT wangjp anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT yuanx anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT gaosg anevaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT gubl evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT qiyj evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT kongjy evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT lizt evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT wangjp evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT yuanx evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis
AT gaosg evaluationofdirectpcrassaysforthedetectionandquantificationofporphyromonasgingivalis