Cargando…
Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study
Acute decompensated heart failure is the leading admitting diagnosis in patients 65 years and older with more than 1 million hospitalizations per year in the US alone. Traditional tools to evaluate for and monitor volume status in patients with heart failure, including symptoms and physical exam fin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8844 |
_version_ | 1783552144270426112 |
---|---|
author | Maw, Anna Ortiz-lopez, Carolina Morris, Megan Jones, Christine D Gee, Elaine Tchernodrinski, Stefan Kramer, Henry R Galen, Benjamin Dempsey, Amanda Soni, Nilam J |
author_facet | Maw, Anna Ortiz-lopez, Carolina Morris, Megan Jones, Christine D Gee, Elaine Tchernodrinski, Stefan Kramer, Henry R Galen, Benjamin Dempsey, Amanda Soni, Nilam J |
author_sort | Maw, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acute decompensated heart failure is the leading admitting diagnosis in patients 65 years and older with more than 1 million hospitalizations per year in the US alone. Traditional tools to evaluate for and monitor volume status in patients with heart failure, including symptoms and physical exam findings, are known to have limited accuracy. In contrast, point of care lung ultrasound is a practical and evidenced-based tool for monitoring of volume status in patients with heart failure. However, few inpatient clinicians currently use this tool to monitor diuresis. We performed semi-structured interviews of 23 hospitalists practicing in five geographically diverse academic institutions in the US to better understand how hospitalists currently assess and monitor volume status in patients hospitalized with heart failure. We also explored their perceptions and attitudes toward adoption of lung ultrasound. Hospitalist participants reported poor reliability and confidence in the accuracy of traditional tools to monitor diuresis and expressed interest in learning or were already using lung ultrasound for this purpose. The time required for training and access to equipment that does not impede workflow were considered important barriers to its adoption by interviewees. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7325405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73254052020-07-01 Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study Maw, Anna Ortiz-lopez, Carolina Morris, Megan Jones, Christine D Gee, Elaine Tchernodrinski, Stefan Kramer, Henry R Galen, Benjamin Dempsey, Amanda Soni, Nilam J Cureus Cardiology Acute decompensated heart failure is the leading admitting diagnosis in patients 65 years and older with more than 1 million hospitalizations per year in the US alone. Traditional tools to evaluate for and monitor volume status in patients with heart failure, including symptoms and physical exam findings, are known to have limited accuracy. In contrast, point of care lung ultrasound is a practical and evidenced-based tool for monitoring of volume status in patients with heart failure. However, few inpatient clinicians currently use this tool to monitor diuresis. We performed semi-structured interviews of 23 hospitalists practicing in five geographically diverse academic institutions in the US to better understand how hospitalists currently assess and monitor volume status in patients hospitalized with heart failure. We also explored their perceptions and attitudes toward adoption of lung ultrasound. Hospitalist participants reported poor reliability and confidence in the accuracy of traditional tools to monitor diuresis and expressed interest in learning or were already using lung ultrasound for this purpose. The time required for training and access to equipment that does not impede workflow were considered important barriers to its adoption by interviewees. Cureus 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7325405/ /pubmed/32617243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8844 Text en Copyright © 2020, Maw et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Cardiology Maw, Anna Ortiz-lopez, Carolina Morris, Megan Jones, Christine D Gee, Elaine Tchernodrinski, Stefan Kramer, Henry R Galen, Benjamin Dempsey, Amanda Soni, Nilam J Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study |
title | Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study |
title_full | Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr | Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study |
title_short | Hospitalist Perspectives of Available Tests to Monitor Volume Status in Patients With Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study |
title_sort | hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study |
topic | Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mawanna hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT ortizlopezcarolina hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT morrismegan hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT joneschristined hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT geeelaine hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT tchernodrinskistefan hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT kramerhenryr hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT galenbenjamin hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT dempseyamanda hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy AT soninilamj hospitalistperspectivesofavailableteststomonitorvolumestatusinpatientswithheartfailureaqualitativestudy |