Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyun-Sook, Choi, Won-Ho, Kim, Bo Young, Kim, Sung Soo, Lee, Sang-Il, Kim, Sang-Hyon, Choi, Sung Jae, Kim, Geun-Tae, Hur, Jin-Wuk, Lee, Myeung-Su, Kim, Yun Sung, Hong, Seung-Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520931323
_version_ 1783552153686638592
author Kim, Hyun-Sook
Choi, Won-Ho
Kim, Bo Young
Kim, Sung Soo
Lee, Sang-Il
Kim, Sang-Hyon
Choi, Sung Jae
Kim, Geun-Tae
Hur, Jin-Wuk
Lee, Myeung-Su
Kim, Yun Sung
Hong, Seung-Jae
author_facet Kim, Hyun-Sook
Choi, Won-Ho
Kim, Bo Young
Kim, Sung Soo
Lee, Sang-Il
Kim, Sang-Hyon
Choi, Sung Jae
Kim, Geun-Tae
Hur, Jin-Wuk
Lee, Myeung-Su
Kim, Yun Sung
Hong, Seung-Jae
author_sort Kim, Hyun-Sook
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® and CELEBREX® in patients with RA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in self-assessed pain intensity determined using a 100-mm visual analog scale after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After a washout period, 119 eligible subjects were randomized to one of two groups (CELBESTA® group, n = 61; CELEBREX® group, n = 58). CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® because the upper limit of two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two groups (difference in the least square [LS] mean, −8.68 mm; two-sided 95% CI −16.59 mm to −0.77 mm) was less than the non-inferiority margin (10 mm). There were no significant differences in GI complications and renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® with regard to the pain relief efficacy in RA patients, and the tolerability and safety profiles were excellent and at similar levels for both preparations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7325469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73254692020-07-08 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial Kim, Hyun-Sook Choi, Won-Ho Kim, Bo Young Kim, Sung Soo Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Sang-Hyon Choi, Sung Jae Kim, Geun-Tae Hur, Jin-Wuk Lee, Myeung-Su Kim, Yun Sung Hong, Seung-Jae J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVES: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® and CELEBREX® in patients with RA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in self-assessed pain intensity determined using a 100-mm visual analog scale after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After a washout period, 119 eligible subjects were randomized to one of two groups (CELBESTA® group, n = 61; CELEBREX® group, n = 58). CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® because the upper limit of two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two groups (difference in the least square [LS] mean, −8.68 mm; two-sided 95% CI −16.59 mm to −0.77 mm) was less than the non-inferiority margin (10 mm). There were no significant differences in GI complications and renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® with regard to the pain relief efficacy in RA patients, and the tolerability and safety profiles were excellent and at similar levels for both preparations. SAGE Publications 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7325469/ /pubmed/32589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520931323 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Prospective Clinical Research Report
Kim, Hyun-Sook
Choi, Won-Ho
Kim, Bo Young
Kim, Sung Soo
Lee, Sang-Il
Kim, Sang-Hyon
Choi, Sung Jae
Kim, Geun-Tae
Hur, Jin-Wuk
Lee, Myeung-Su
Kim, Yun Sung
Hong, Seung-Jae
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of celbesta® versus celebrex® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
topic Prospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520931323
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyunsook comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT choiwonho comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT kimboyoung comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT kimsungsoo comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT leesangil comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT kimsanghyon comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT choisungjae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT kimgeuntae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT hurjinwuk comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT leemyeungsu comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT kimyunsung comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial
AT hongseungjae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial