Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial
OBJECTIVES: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the effi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520931323 |
_version_ | 1783552153686638592 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyun-Sook Choi, Won-Ho Kim, Bo Young Kim, Sung Soo Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Sang-Hyon Choi, Sung Jae Kim, Geun-Tae Hur, Jin-Wuk Lee, Myeung-Su Kim, Yun Sung Hong, Seung-Jae |
author_facet | Kim, Hyun-Sook Choi, Won-Ho Kim, Bo Young Kim, Sung Soo Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Sang-Hyon Choi, Sung Jae Kim, Geun-Tae Hur, Jin-Wuk Lee, Myeung-Su Kim, Yun Sung Hong, Seung-Jae |
author_sort | Kim, Hyun-Sook |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® and CELEBREX® in patients with RA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in self-assessed pain intensity determined using a 100-mm visual analog scale after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After a washout period, 119 eligible subjects were randomized to one of two groups (CELBESTA® group, n = 61; CELEBREX® group, n = 58). CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® because the upper limit of two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two groups (difference in the least square [LS] mean, −8.68 mm; two-sided 95% CI −16.59 mm to −0.77 mm) was less than the non-inferiority margin (10 mm). There were no significant differences in GI complications and renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® with regard to the pain relief efficacy in RA patients, and the tolerability and safety profiles were excellent and at similar levels for both preparations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7325469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73254692020-07-08 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial Kim, Hyun-Sook Choi, Won-Ho Kim, Bo Young Kim, Sung Soo Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Sang-Hyon Choi, Sung Jae Kim, Geun-Tae Hur, Jin-Wuk Lee, Myeung-Su Kim, Yun Sung Hong, Seung-Jae J Int Med Res Prospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVES: Celecoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that is commonly used to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). CELBESTA® is a generic equivalent to CELEBREX®, a celecoxib preparation. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® and CELEBREX® in patients with RA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in self-assessed pain intensity determined using a 100-mm visual analog scale after 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: After a washout period, 119 eligible subjects were randomized to one of two groups (CELBESTA® group, n = 61; CELEBREX® group, n = 58). CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® because the upper limit of two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two groups (difference in the least square [LS] mean, −8.68 mm; two-sided 95% CI −16.59 mm to −0.77 mm) was less than the non-inferiority margin (10 mm). There were no significant differences in GI complications and renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CELBESTA® was not inferior to CELEBREX® with regard to the pain relief efficacy in RA patients, and the tolerability and safety profiles were excellent and at similar levels for both preparations. SAGE Publications 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7325469/ /pubmed/32589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520931323 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Prospective Clinical Research Report Kim, Hyun-Sook Choi, Won-Ho Kim, Bo Young Kim, Sung Soo Lee, Sang-Il Kim, Sang-Hyon Choi, Sung Jae Kim, Geun-Tae Hur, Jin-Wuk Lee, Myeung-Su Kim, Yun Sung Hong, Seung-Jae Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
title | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy and safety of CELBESTA® versus CELEBREX® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and safety of celbesta® versus celebrex® in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 4 clinical trial |
topic | Prospective Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520931323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyunsook comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT choiwonho comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT kimboyoung comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT kimsungsoo comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT leesangil comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT kimsanghyon comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT choisungjae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT kimgeuntae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT hurjinwuk comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT leemyeungsu comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT kimyunsung comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial AT hongseungjae comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcelbestaversuscelebrexinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisa6weekmulticenterdoubleblinddoubledummyactivecontrolledrandomizedparallelgroupnoninferiorityphase4clinicaltrial |