Cargando…
A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
The present study represents a two-phase process evaluation of the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. The first phase analyzed uptake efforts using chart review data, which revealed that 158 (16.8%) of 942 h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178221820936666 |
_version_ | 1783552164518428672 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Sarah E Lapomardo, Andrea Thibeau, Heather M Altemus, Melanie Hunt, Jeffrey I Wolff, Jennifer C |
author_facet | Johnson, Sarah E Lapomardo, Andrea Thibeau, Heather M Altemus, Melanie Hunt, Jeffrey I Wolff, Jennifer C |
author_sort | Johnson, Sarah E |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study represents a two-phase process evaluation of the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. The first phase analyzed uptake efforts using chart review data, which revealed that 158 (16.8%) of 942 hospitalized patients (Mean age = 15.81, SD = 1.24) were eligible to receive the brief intervention; however, only 30 (19%) adolescents received the intervention, 15 (9.5%) declined treatment, and 113 (71.5%) were never offered. The second phase involved directed content analyses of clinical staff and providers’ perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation. Qualitative findings revealed that providers and staff accepted and agreed with the use of the brief substance use intervention, though perceived time constraints, competing demands, and insufficient staffing interfered with implementation across disciplines. Barriers included patients’ length of stay and competing treatment priorities. Several recommendations emerged including, utilization of non-clinical staff, a clear administration protocol, and the use of computer-based interventions. Findings from the present study shed light on the need to consider alternate or more streamlined substance use treatments such as computerized approaches and focus on ways in which protocol can be modified to fit the needs within an acute, short-term setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7325535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73255352020-07-08 A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program Johnson, Sarah E Lapomardo, Andrea Thibeau, Heather M Altemus, Melanie Hunt, Jeffrey I Wolff, Jennifer C Subst Abuse Original Research The present study represents a two-phase process evaluation of the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. The first phase analyzed uptake efforts using chart review data, which revealed that 158 (16.8%) of 942 hospitalized patients (Mean age = 15.81, SD = 1.24) were eligible to receive the brief intervention; however, only 30 (19%) adolescents received the intervention, 15 (9.5%) declined treatment, and 113 (71.5%) were never offered. The second phase involved directed content analyses of clinical staff and providers’ perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation. Qualitative findings revealed that providers and staff accepted and agreed with the use of the brief substance use intervention, though perceived time constraints, competing demands, and insufficient staffing interfered with implementation across disciplines. Barriers included patients’ length of stay and competing treatment priorities. Several recommendations emerged including, utilization of non-clinical staff, a clear administration protocol, and the use of computer-based interventions. Findings from the present study shed light on the need to consider alternate or more streamlined substance use treatments such as computerized approaches and focus on ways in which protocol can be modified to fit the needs within an acute, short-term setting. SAGE Publications 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7325535/ /pubmed/32647475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178221820936666 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Johnson, Sarah E Lapomardo, Andrea Thibeau, Heather M Altemus, Melanie Hunt, Jeffrey I Wolff, Jennifer C A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program |
title | A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program |
title_full | A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program |
title_fullStr | A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program |
title_full_unstemmed | A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program |
title_short | A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program |
title_sort | process evaluation of a substance use brief intervention for adolescents in a psychiatric inpatient program |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178221820936666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonsarahe aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT lapomardoandrea aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT thibeauheatherm aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT altemusmelanie aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT huntjeffreyi aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT wolffjenniferc aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT johnsonsarahe processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT lapomardoandrea processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT thibeauheatherm processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT altemusmelanie processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT huntjeffreyi processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram AT wolffjenniferc processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram |