Cargando…

A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program

The present study represents a two-phase process evaluation of the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. The first phase analyzed uptake efforts using chart review data, which revealed that 158 (16.8%) of 942 h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Sarah E, Lapomardo, Andrea, Thibeau, Heather M, Altemus, Melanie, Hunt, Jeffrey I, Wolff, Jennifer C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178221820936666
_version_ 1783552164518428672
author Johnson, Sarah E
Lapomardo, Andrea
Thibeau, Heather M
Altemus, Melanie
Hunt, Jeffrey I
Wolff, Jennifer C
author_facet Johnson, Sarah E
Lapomardo, Andrea
Thibeau, Heather M
Altemus, Melanie
Hunt, Jeffrey I
Wolff, Jennifer C
author_sort Johnson, Sarah E
collection PubMed
description The present study represents a two-phase process evaluation of the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. The first phase analyzed uptake efforts using chart review data, which revealed that 158 (16.8%) of 942 hospitalized patients (Mean age = 15.81, SD = 1.24) were eligible to receive the brief intervention; however, only 30 (19%) adolescents received the intervention, 15 (9.5%) declined treatment, and 113 (71.5%) were never offered. The second phase involved directed content analyses of clinical staff and providers’ perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation. Qualitative findings revealed that providers and staff accepted and agreed with the use of the brief substance use intervention, though perceived time constraints, competing demands, and insufficient staffing interfered with implementation across disciplines. Barriers included patients’ length of stay and competing treatment priorities. Several recommendations emerged including, utilization of non-clinical staff, a clear administration protocol, and the use of computer-based interventions. Findings from the present study shed light on the need to consider alternate or more streamlined substance use treatments such as computerized approaches and focus on ways in which protocol can be modified to fit the needs within an acute, short-term setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7325535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73255352020-07-08 A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program Johnson, Sarah E Lapomardo, Andrea Thibeau, Heather M Altemus, Melanie Hunt, Jeffrey I Wolff, Jennifer C Subst Abuse Original Research The present study represents a two-phase process evaluation of the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. The first phase analyzed uptake efforts using chart review data, which revealed that 158 (16.8%) of 942 hospitalized patients (Mean age = 15.81, SD = 1.24) were eligible to receive the brief intervention; however, only 30 (19%) adolescents received the intervention, 15 (9.5%) declined treatment, and 113 (71.5%) were never offered. The second phase involved directed content analyses of clinical staff and providers’ perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation. Qualitative findings revealed that providers and staff accepted and agreed with the use of the brief substance use intervention, though perceived time constraints, competing demands, and insufficient staffing interfered with implementation across disciplines. Barriers included patients’ length of stay and competing treatment priorities. Several recommendations emerged including, utilization of non-clinical staff, a clear administration protocol, and the use of computer-based interventions. Findings from the present study shed light on the need to consider alternate or more streamlined substance use treatments such as computerized approaches and focus on ways in which protocol can be modified to fit the needs within an acute, short-term setting. SAGE Publications 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7325535/ /pubmed/32647475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178221820936666 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Johnson, Sarah E
Lapomardo, Andrea
Thibeau, Heather M
Altemus, Melanie
Hunt, Jeffrey I
Wolff, Jennifer C
A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
title A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
title_full A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
title_fullStr A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
title_full_unstemmed A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
title_short A Process Evaluation of a Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in a Psychiatric Inpatient Program
title_sort process evaluation of a substance use brief intervention for adolescents in a psychiatric inpatient program
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1178221820936666
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonsarahe aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT lapomardoandrea aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT thibeauheatherm aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT altemusmelanie aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT huntjeffreyi aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT wolffjenniferc aprocessevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT johnsonsarahe processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT lapomardoandrea processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT thibeauheatherm processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT altemusmelanie processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT huntjeffreyi processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram
AT wolffjenniferc processevaluationofasubstanceusebriefinterventionforadolescentsinapsychiatricinpatientprogram