Cargando…
Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: As the number of indications for labour induction continue to increase, the focus has shifted to performing these procedures in an outpatient setting. This study aims to systematically review published data from randomized controlled trials that compare outpatient with inpatient labour i...
Autores principales: | Dong, Susan, Khan, Maria, Hashimi, Farahnosh, Chamy, Caroline, D’Souza, Rohan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03060-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction to: Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and metaanalysis
por: Dong, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
por: Henry, Amanda, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Women’s preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment
por: Howard, Kirsten, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
por: Wise, Michelle R., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction
por: Alavifard, Sepand, et al.
Publicado: (2019)