Cargando…
Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement?
Technological innovation is transforming traditional clinical practice, enabling people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to contribute health care outcome data remotely between clinic visits. In both relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), patients may experience variable disabilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00464 |
_version_ | 1783552236556648448 |
---|---|
author | Allen-Philbey, Kimberley Middleton, Rod Tuite-Dalton, Katie Baker, Elaine Stennett, Andrea Albor, Christo Schmierer, Klaus |
author_facet | Allen-Philbey, Kimberley Middleton, Rod Tuite-Dalton, Katie Baker, Elaine Stennett, Andrea Albor, Christo Schmierer, Klaus |
author_sort | Allen-Philbey, Kimberley |
collection | PubMed |
description | Technological innovation is transforming traditional clinical practice, enabling people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to contribute health care outcome data remotely between clinic visits. In both relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), patients may experience variable disability accrual and symptoms throughout their disease course. The potential impact on the quality of life (QoL) in pwMS and their families and carers is profound. The introduction of treatment targets, such as NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) and NEPAD (no evidence of progression or active disease), that guide clinical decision-making, highlight the importance of utilizing sensitive instruments to measure and track disease activity and progression. However, the gold standard neurological disability tool—expanded disability severity scale (EDSS)—has universally recognized limitations. With strides made in our understanding of MS pathophysiology and DMT responsiveness, maintaining the status quo of measuring disability progression is no longer the recommended option. Outside the clinical trial setting, a comprehensive monitoring system has not been robustly established for pwMS. A 21st-century approach is required to integrate clinical, paraclinical, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from electronic health records, local databases, and patient registries. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is critical in the design and implementation of this workflow. To take full advantage of the potential of digital technology in the monitoring and care and QoL of pwMS will require iterative feedback between pwMS, health care professionals (HCPs), scientists, and digital experts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7325931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73259312020-07-09 Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? Allen-Philbey, Kimberley Middleton, Rod Tuite-Dalton, Katie Baker, Elaine Stennett, Andrea Albor, Christo Schmierer, Klaus Front Neurol Neurology Technological innovation is transforming traditional clinical practice, enabling people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to contribute health care outcome data remotely between clinic visits. In both relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), patients may experience variable disability accrual and symptoms throughout their disease course. The potential impact on the quality of life (QoL) in pwMS and their families and carers is profound. The introduction of treatment targets, such as NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) and NEPAD (no evidence of progression or active disease), that guide clinical decision-making, highlight the importance of utilizing sensitive instruments to measure and track disease activity and progression. However, the gold standard neurological disability tool—expanded disability severity scale (EDSS)—has universally recognized limitations. With strides made in our understanding of MS pathophysiology and DMT responsiveness, maintaining the status quo of measuring disability progression is no longer the recommended option. Outside the clinical trial setting, a comprehensive monitoring system has not been robustly established for pwMS. A 21st-century approach is required to integrate clinical, paraclinical, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from electronic health records, local databases, and patient registries. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is critical in the design and implementation of this workflow. To take full advantage of the potential of digital technology in the monitoring and care and QoL of pwMS will require iterative feedback between pwMS, health care professionals (HCPs), scientists, and digital experts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7325931/ /pubmed/32655472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00464 Text en Copyright © 2020 Allen-Philbey, Middleton, Tuite-Dalton, Baker, Stennett, Albor and Schmierer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Allen-Philbey, Kimberley Middleton, Rod Tuite-Dalton, Katie Baker, Elaine Stennett, Andrea Albor, Christo Schmierer, Klaus Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? |
title | Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? |
title_full | Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? |
title_fullStr | Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? |
title_short | Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement? |
title_sort | can we improve the monitoring of people with multiple sclerosis using simple tools, data sharing, and patient engagement? |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenphilbeykimberley canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement AT middletonrod canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement AT tuitedaltonkatie canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement AT bakerelaine canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement AT stennettandrea canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement AT alborchristo canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement AT schmiererklaus canweimprovethemonitoringofpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisusingsimpletoolsdatasharingandpatientengagement |