Cargando…

Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing

Sounds in our environment can easily capture human visual attention. Previous studies have investigated the impact of spatially localized, brief sounds on concurrent visuospatial attention. However, little is known on how the presence of a continuous, lateralized auditory stimulus (e.g., a person ta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pomper, Ulrich, Schmid, Rebecca, Ansorge, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183
_version_ 1783552251016511488
author Pomper, Ulrich
Schmid, Rebecca
Ansorge, Ulrich
author_facet Pomper, Ulrich
Schmid, Rebecca
Ansorge, Ulrich
author_sort Pomper, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description Sounds in our environment can easily capture human visual attention. Previous studies have investigated the impact of spatially localized, brief sounds on concurrent visuospatial attention. However, little is known on how the presence of a continuous, lateralized auditory stimulus (e.g., a person talking next to you while driving a car) impacts visual spatial attention (e.g., detection of critical events in traffic). In two experiments, we investigated whether a continuous auditory stream presented from one side biases visual spatial attention toward that side. Participants had to either passively or actively listen to sounds of various semantic complexities (tone pips, spoken digits, and a spoken story) while performing a visual target discrimination task. During both passive and active listening, we observed faster response times to visual targets presented spatially close to the relevant auditory stream. Additionally, we found that higher levels of semantic complexity of the presented sounds led to reduced visual discrimination sensitivity, but only during active listening to the sounds. We provide important novel results by showing that the presence of a continuous, ongoing auditory stimulus can impact visual processing, even when the sounds are not endogenously attended to. Together, our findings demonstrate the implications of ongoing sounds on visual processing in everyday scenarios such as moving about in traffic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7325992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73259922020-07-09 Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing Pomper, Ulrich Schmid, Rebecca Ansorge, Ulrich Front Psychol Psychology Sounds in our environment can easily capture human visual attention. Previous studies have investigated the impact of spatially localized, brief sounds on concurrent visuospatial attention. However, little is known on how the presence of a continuous, lateralized auditory stimulus (e.g., a person talking next to you while driving a car) impacts visual spatial attention (e.g., detection of critical events in traffic). In two experiments, we investigated whether a continuous auditory stream presented from one side biases visual spatial attention toward that side. Participants had to either passively or actively listen to sounds of various semantic complexities (tone pips, spoken digits, and a spoken story) while performing a visual target discrimination task. During both passive and active listening, we observed faster response times to visual targets presented spatially close to the relevant auditory stream. Additionally, we found that higher levels of semantic complexity of the presented sounds led to reduced visual discrimination sensitivity, but only during active listening to the sounds. We provide important novel results by showing that the presence of a continuous, ongoing auditory stimulus can impact visual processing, even when the sounds are not endogenously attended to. Together, our findings demonstrate the implications of ongoing sounds on visual processing in everyday scenarios such as moving about in traffic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7325992/ /pubmed/32655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183 Text en Copyright © 2020 Pomper, Schmid and Ansorge. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pomper, Ulrich
Schmid, Rebecca
Ansorge, Ulrich
Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
title Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
title_full Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
title_fullStr Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
title_full_unstemmed Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
title_short Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
title_sort continuous, lateralized auditory stimulation biases visual spatial processing
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183
work_keys_str_mv AT pomperulrich continuouslateralizedauditorystimulationbiasesvisualspatialprocessing
AT schmidrebecca continuouslateralizedauditorystimulationbiasesvisualspatialprocessing
AT ansorgeulrich continuouslateralizedauditorystimulationbiasesvisualspatialprocessing