Cargando…
Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing
Sounds in our environment can easily capture human visual attention. Previous studies have investigated the impact of spatially localized, brief sounds on concurrent visuospatial attention. However, little is known on how the presence of a continuous, lateralized auditory stimulus (e.g., a person ta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183 |
_version_ | 1783552251016511488 |
---|---|
author | Pomper, Ulrich Schmid, Rebecca Ansorge, Ulrich |
author_facet | Pomper, Ulrich Schmid, Rebecca Ansorge, Ulrich |
author_sort | Pomper, Ulrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sounds in our environment can easily capture human visual attention. Previous studies have investigated the impact of spatially localized, brief sounds on concurrent visuospatial attention. However, little is known on how the presence of a continuous, lateralized auditory stimulus (e.g., a person talking next to you while driving a car) impacts visual spatial attention (e.g., detection of critical events in traffic). In two experiments, we investigated whether a continuous auditory stream presented from one side biases visual spatial attention toward that side. Participants had to either passively or actively listen to sounds of various semantic complexities (tone pips, spoken digits, and a spoken story) while performing a visual target discrimination task. During both passive and active listening, we observed faster response times to visual targets presented spatially close to the relevant auditory stream. Additionally, we found that higher levels of semantic complexity of the presented sounds led to reduced visual discrimination sensitivity, but only during active listening to the sounds. We provide important novel results by showing that the presence of a continuous, ongoing auditory stimulus can impact visual processing, even when the sounds are not endogenously attended to. Together, our findings demonstrate the implications of ongoing sounds on visual processing in everyday scenarios such as moving about in traffic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7325992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73259922020-07-09 Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing Pomper, Ulrich Schmid, Rebecca Ansorge, Ulrich Front Psychol Psychology Sounds in our environment can easily capture human visual attention. Previous studies have investigated the impact of spatially localized, brief sounds on concurrent visuospatial attention. However, little is known on how the presence of a continuous, lateralized auditory stimulus (e.g., a person talking next to you while driving a car) impacts visual spatial attention (e.g., detection of critical events in traffic). In two experiments, we investigated whether a continuous auditory stream presented from one side biases visual spatial attention toward that side. Participants had to either passively or actively listen to sounds of various semantic complexities (tone pips, spoken digits, and a spoken story) while performing a visual target discrimination task. During both passive and active listening, we observed faster response times to visual targets presented spatially close to the relevant auditory stream. Additionally, we found that higher levels of semantic complexity of the presented sounds led to reduced visual discrimination sensitivity, but only during active listening to the sounds. We provide important novel results by showing that the presence of a continuous, ongoing auditory stimulus can impact visual processing, even when the sounds are not endogenously attended to. Together, our findings demonstrate the implications of ongoing sounds on visual processing in everyday scenarios such as moving about in traffic. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7325992/ /pubmed/32655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183 Text en Copyright © 2020 Pomper, Schmid and Ansorge. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Pomper, Ulrich Schmid, Rebecca Ansorge, Ulrich Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing |
title | Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing |
title_full | Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing |
title_fullStr | Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing |
title_short | Continuous, Lateralized Auditory Stimulation Biases Visual Spatial Processing |
title_sort | continuous, lateralized auditory stimulation biases visual spatial processing |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pomperulrich continuouslateralizedauditorystimulationbiasesvisualspatialprocessing AT schmidrebecca continuouslateralizedauditorystimulationbiasesvisualspatialprocessing AT ansorgeulrich continuouslateralizedauditorystimulationbiasesvisualspatialprocessing |