Cargando…

Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases

OBJECTIVE: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD) poses a significant clinical and societal burden, relying on different operational definitions and treatment approaches. The detection of clinical predictors of resistance is elusive, soliciting clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fornaro, Michele, Fusco, Andrea, Novello, Stefano, Mosca, Pierluigi, Anastasia, Annalisa, De Blasio, Antonella, Iasevoli, Felice, de Bartolomeis, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00438
_version_ 1783552271215230976
author Fornaro, Michele
Fusco, Andrea
Novello, Stefano
Mosca, Pierluigi
Anastasia, Annalisa
De Blasio, Antonella
Iasevoli, Felice
de Bartolomeis, Andrea
author_facet Fornaro, Michele
Fusco, Andrea
Novello, Stefano
Mosca, Pierluigi
Anastasia, Annalisa
De Blasio, Antonella
Iasevoli, Felice
de Bartolomeis, Andrea
author_sort Fornaro, Michele
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD) poses a significant clinical and societal burden, relying on different operational definitions and treatment approaches. The detection of clinical predictors of resistance is elusive, soliciting clinical subtyping of the depressive episodes, which represents the goal of the present study. METHODS: A hundred and thirty-one depressed outpatients underwent psychopathological evaluation using major rating tools, including the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, which served for subsequent principal component analysis, followed-up by cluster analysis, with the ultimate goal to fetch different clinical subtypes of depression. RESULTS: The cluster analysis identified two clinically interpretable, yet distinctive, groups among 53 bipolar (resistant cases = 15, or 28.3%) and 78 unipolar (resistant cases = 20, or 25.6%) patients. Among the MDD patients, cluster “1” included the following components: “Psychic symptoms, depressed mood, suicide, guilty, insomnia” and “genitourinary, gastrointestinal, weight loss, insight”. Altogether, with broadly defined “mixed features,” this latter cluster correctly predicted treatment outcome in 80.8% cases of MDD. The same “broadly-defined” mixed features of depression (namely, the standard Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition—DSM-5—specifier plus increased energy, psychomotor activity, irritability) correctly classified 71.7% of BD cases, either as TRBD or not. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and high rate of comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Although relying on different operational criteria and treatment history, TRD and TRBD seem to be consistently predicted by broadly defined mixed features among different clinical subtypes of depression, either unipolar or bipolar cases. If replicated by upcoming studies to encompass also biological and neuropsychological measures, the present study may aid in precision medicine and informed pharmacotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7326075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73260752020-07-14 Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases Fornaro, Michele Fusco, Andrea Novello, Stefano Mosca, Pierluigi Anastasia, Annalisa De Blasio, Antonella Iasevoli, Felice de Bartolomeis, Andrea Front Psychiatry Psychiatry OBJECTIVE: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD) poses a significant clinical and societal burden, relying on different operational definitions and treatment approaches. The detection of clinical predictors of resistance is elusive, soliciting clinical subtyping of the depressive episodes, which represents the goal of the present study. METHODS: A hundred and thirty-one depressed outpatients underwent psychopathological evaluation using major rating tools, including the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, which served for subsequent principal component analysis, followed-up by cluster analysis, with the ultimate goal to fetch different clinical subtypes of depression. RESULTS: The cluster analysis identified two clinically interpretable, yet distinctive, groups among 53 bipolar (resistant cases = 15, or 28.3%) and 78 unipolar (resistant cases = 20, or 25.6%) patients. Among the MDD patients, cluster “1” included the following components: “Psychic symptoms, depressed mood, suicide, guilty, insomnia” and “genitourinary, gastrointestinal, weight loss, insight”. Altogether, with broadly defined “mixed features,” this latter cluster correctly predicted treatment outcome in 80.8% cases of MDD. The same “broadly-defined” mixed features of depression (namely, the standard Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition—DSM-5—specifier plus increased energy, psychomotor activity, irritability) correctly classified 71.7% of BD cases, either as TRBD or not. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and high rate of comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Although relying on different operational criteria and treatment history, TRD and TRBD seem to be consistently predicted by broadly defined mixed features among different clinical subtypes of depression, either unipolar or bipolar cases. If replicated by upcoming studies to encompass also biological and neuropsychological measures, the present study may aid in precision medicine and informed pharmacotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7326075/ /pubmed/32670098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00438 Text en Copyright © 2020 Fornaro, Fusco, Novello, Mosca, Anastasia, De Blasio, Iasevoli and de Bartolomeis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Fornaro, Michele
Fusco, Andrea
Novello, Stefano
Mosca, Pierluigi
Anastasia, Annalisa
De Blasio, Antonella
Iasevoli, Felice
de Bartolomeis, Andrea
Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases
title Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases
title_full Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases
title_fullStr Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases
title_short Predictors of Treatment Resistance Across Different Clinical Subtypes of Depression: Comparison of Unipolar vs. Bipolar Cases
title_sort predictors of treatment resistance across different clinical subtypes of depression: comparison of unipolar vs. bipolar cases
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00438
work_keys_str_mv AT fornaromichele predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT fuscoandrea predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT novellostefano predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT moscapierluigi predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT anastasiaannalisa predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT deblasioantonella predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT iasevolifelice predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases
AT debartolomeisandrea predictorsoftreatmentresistanceacrossdifferentclinicalsubtypesofdepressioncomparisonofunipolarvsbipolarcases