Cargando…

Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series

AIMS: First, the aim of the study was to determine whether irreversible electroporation (IRE) is associated with heat generation in the liver and pancreas at clinical (≤1,500 V/cm) and supraclinical (>1,500 V/cm) electroporation settings; second, to assess the risk of thermal tissue damage in and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agnass, Pierre, van Veldhuisen, Eran, Vogel, Jantien A., Kok, H. Petra, de Keijzer, Mark J., Schooneveldt, Gerben, de Haan, Lianne R., Klaessens, John H., Scheffer, Hester J., Meijerink, Martijn R., van Lienden, Krijn P., van Gulik, Thomas M., Heger, Michal, Crezee, Johannes, Besselink, Marc G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617426
_version_ 1783552315728330752
author Agnass, Pierre
van Veldhuisen, Eran
Vogel, Jantien A.
Kok, H. Petra
de Keijzer, Mark J.
Schooneveldt, Gerben
de Haan, Lianne R.
Klaessens, John H.
Scheffer, Hester J.
Meijerink, Martijn R.
van Lienden, Krijn P.
van Gulik, Thomas M.
Heger, Michal
Crezee, Johannes
Besselink, Marc G.
author_facet Agnass, Pierre
van Veldhuisen, Eran
Vogel, Jantien A.
Kok, H. Petra
de Keijzer, Mark J.
Schooneveldt, Gerben
de Haan, Lianne R.
Klaessens, John H.
Scheffer, Hester J.
Meijerink, Martijn R.
van Lienden, Krijn P.
van Gulik, Thomas M.
Heger, Michal
Crezee, Johannes
Besselink, Marc G.
author_sort Agnass, Pierre
collection PubMed
description AIMS: First, the aim of the study was to determine whether irreversible electroporation (IRE) is associated with heat generation in the liver and pancreas at clinical (≤1,500 V/cm) and supraclinical (>1,500 V/cm) electroporation settings; second, to assess the risk of thermal tissue damage in and adjacent to the treated volume in highly perfused versus moderately perfused parts of both organs; third, to investigate the influence of perfusion and of the presence and the orientation of a metal stent on the maximal thermal elevation (ΔT(Session,max)) in the tissue during an IRE session at fixed IRE settings, and finally, to determine whether the maximum temperature elevation within the IRE-subjected organ during an IRE treatment (single or multiple sessions) is reflected in the organ’s surface temperature. METHODS: The aims were investigated in 12 case studies conducted in five female Landrace pigs. Several IRE settings were applied for lateral (2), triangular (3), and rectangular (4) electrode configurations in the liver hilum, liver periphery, pancreas head, and pancreas tail. IRE series of 10-90 pulses were applied with pulse durations that varied from 70 μs to 90 μs and electric field strengths between 1,200 V/cm and 3,000 V/cm. In select cases, a metal stent was positioned in the bile duct at the level of the liver hilum. Temperatures were measured before, during, and after IRE in and adjacent to the treatment volumes using fiber optical temperature probes (temperature at the nucleation centers) and digital thermography (surface temperature). The occurrence of thermal damage was assumed to be at temperatures above 50 °C (ΔT(Session,max) ≥ 13 °C relative to body temperature of 37 °C). The temperature fluctuations at the organ surface (ΔT(LocSurf)) were compared to the maximum temperature elevation during an IRE treatment in the electroporation zone. In select cases, IRE was applied to tissue volumes encompassing the portal vein (PV) and a constricted and patent superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to determine the influence of the heatsink effect of PV and SMV on ΔT(Session,max). RESULTS: The median baseline temperature was 31.6 °C-36.3 °C. ΔT(Session,max) ranged from –1.7 °C to 25.5 °C in moderately perfused parts of the liver and pancreas, and from 0.0 °C to 5.8 °C in highly perfused parts. The median ΔT(LocSurf) of the liver and pancreas was 1.0 °C and 10.3 °C, respectively. Constricting the SMV in the pancreas head yielded a 0.8 °C higher ΔT(Session,max). The presence of a metal stent in the liver hilum resulted in a ΔT(Session,max) of 19.8 °C. Stents parallel to the electrodes caused a ΔT(Session,max) difference of 4.2 °C relative to the perpendicular orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on IRE settings and tissue type, IRE is capable of inducing considerable heating in the liver and pancreas that is sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage. More significant temperature elevations are positively correlated with increasing number of electrode pairs, electric field strength, and pulse number. Temperature elevations can be further exacerbated by the presence and orientation of metal stents. Temperature elevations at the nucleation centers are not always reflected in the organ’s surface temperature. Heat sink effects caused by large vessels were minimal in some instances, possibly due to reduced blood flow caused by anesthesia. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Appropriate IRE settings must be chosen based on the tissue type and the presence of stents to avoid thermal damage in healthy peritumoral tissue and to protect anatomical structures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7326268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73262682020-07-01 Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series Agnass, Pierre van Veldhuisen, Eran Vogel, Jantien A. Kok, H. Petra de Keijzer, Mark J. Schooneveldt, Gerben de Haan, Lianne R. Klaessens, John H. Scheffer, Hester J. Meijerink, Martijn R. van Lienden, Krijn P. van Gulik, Thomas M. Heger, Michal Crezee, Johannes Besselink, Marc G. J Clin Transl Res Original Article AIMS: First, the aim of the study was to determine whether irreversible electroporation (IRE) is associated with heat generation in the liver and pancreas at clinical (≤1,500 V/cm) and supraclinical (>1,500 V/cm) electroporation settings; second, to assess the risk of thermal tissue damage in and adjacent to the treated volume in highly perfused versus moderately perfused parts of both organs; third, to investigate the influence of perfusion and of the presence and the orientation of a metal stent on the maximal thermal elevation (ΔT(Session,max)) in the tissue during an IRE session at fixed IRE settings, and finally, to determine whether the maximum temperature elevation within the IRE-subjected organ during an IRE treatment (single or multiple sessions) is reflected in the organ’s surface temperature. METHODS: The aims were investigated in 12 case studies conducted in five female Landrace pigs. Several IRE settings were applied for lateral (2), triangular (3), and rectangular (4) electrode configurations in the liver hilum, liver periphery, pancreas head, and pancreas tail. IRE series of 10-90 pulses were applied with pulse durations that varied from 70 μs to 90 μs and electric field strengths between 1,200 V/cm and 3,000 V/cm. In select cases, a metal stent was positioned in the bile duct at the level of the liver hilum. Temperatures were measured before, during, and after IRE in and adjacent to the treatment volumes using fiber optical temperature probes (temperature at the nucleation centers) and digital thermography (surface temperature). The occurrence of thermal damage was assumed to be at temperatures above 50 °C (ΔT(Session,max) ≥ 13 °C relative to body temperature of 37 °C). The temperature fluctuations at the organ surface (ΔT(LocSurf)) were compared to the maximum temperature elevation during an IRE treatment in the electroporation zone. In select cases, IRE was applied to tissue volumes encompassing the portal vein (PV) and a constricted and patent superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to determine the influence of the heatsink effect of PV and SMV on ΔT(Session,max). RESULTS: The median baseline temperature was 31.6 °C-36.3 °C. ΔT(Session,max) ranged from –1.7 °C to 25.5 °C in moderately perfused parts of the liver and pancreas, and from 0.0 °C to 5.8 °C in highly perfused parts. The median ΔT(LocSurf) of the liver and pancreas was 1.0 °C and 10.3 °C, respectively. Constricting the SMV in the pancreas head yielded a 0.8 °C higher ΔT(Session,max). The presence of a metal stent in the liver hilum resulted in a ΔT(Session,max) of 19.8 °C. Stents parallel to the electrodes caused a ΔT(Session,max) difference of 4.2 °C relative to the perpendicular orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on IRE settings and tissue type, IRE is capable of inducing considerable heating in the liver and pancreas that is sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage. More significant temperature elevations are positively correlated with increasing number of electrode pairs, electric field strength, and pulse number. Temperature elevations can be further exacerbated by the presence and orientation of metal stents. Temperature elevations at the nucleation centers are not always reflected in the organ’s surface temperature. Heat sink effects caused by large vessels were minimal in some instances, possibly due to reduced blood flow caused by anesthesia. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Appropriate IRE settings must be chosen based on the tissue type and the presence of stents to avoid thermal damage in healthy peritumoral tissue and to protect anatomical structures Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7326268/ /pubmed/32617426 Text en Copyright © 2020, Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Agnass, Pierre
van Veldhuisen, Eran
Vogel, Jantien A.
Kok, H. Petra
de Keijzer, Mark J.
Schooneveldt, Gerben
de Haan, Lianne R.
Klaessens, John H.
Scheffer, Hester J.
Meijerink, Martijn R.
van Lienden, Krijn P.
van Gulik, Thomas M.
Heger, Michal
Crezee, Johannes
Besselink, Marc G.
Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
title Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
title_full Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
title_fullStr Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
title_full_unstemmed Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
title_short Thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
title_sort thermodynamic profiling during irreversible electroporation in porcine liver and pancreas: a case study series
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617426
work_keys_str_mv AT agnasspierre thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT vanveldhuiseneran thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT vogeljantiena thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT kokhpetra thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT dekeijzermarkj thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT schooneveldtgerben thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT dehaanlianner thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT klaessensjohnh thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT schefferhesterj thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT meijerinkmartijnr thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT vanliendenkrijnp thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT vangulikthomasm thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT hegermichal thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT crezeejohannes thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries
AT besselinkmarcg thermodynamicprofilingduringirreversibleelectroporationinporcineliverandpancreasacasestudyseries