Cargando…

Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study

The COVID-19 pandemia due to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, in its first 4 months since its outbreak, has to date reached more than 200 countries worldwide with more than 2 million confirmed cases (probably a much higher number of infected), and almost 200,000 deaths. Amplification of viral RNA by (rea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinati, Davide, Campagner, Andrea, Ferrari, Davide, Locatelli, Massimo, Banfi, Giuseppe, Cabitza, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01597-4
_version_ 1783552383546032128
author Brinati, Davide
Campagner, Andrea
Ferrari, Davide
Locatelli, Massimo
Banfi, Giuseppe
Cabitza, Federico
author_facet Brinati, Davide
Campagner, Andrea
Ferrari, Davide
Locatelli, Massimo
Banfi, Giuseppe
Cabitza, Federico
author_sort Brinati, Davide
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemia due to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, in its first 4 months since its outbreak, has to date reached more than 200 countries worldwide with more than 2 million confirmed cases (probably a much higher number of infected), and almost 200,000 deaths. Amplification of viral RNA by (real time) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the current gold standard test for confirmation of infection, although it presents known shortcomings: long turnaround times (3-4 hours to generate results), potential shortage of reagents, false-negative rates as large as 15-20%, the need for certified laboratories, expensive equipment and trained personnel. Thus there is a need for alternative, faster, less expensive and more accessible tests. We developed two machine learning classification models using hematochemical values from routine blood exams (namely: white blood cells counts, and the platelets, CRP, AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, LDH plasma levels) drawn from 279 patients who, after being admitted to the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) emergency-room with COVID-19 symptoms, were screened with the rRT-PCR test performed on respiratory tract specimens. Of these patients, 177 resulted positive, whereas 102 received a negative response. We have developed two machine learning models, to discriminate between patients who are either positive or negative to the SARS-CoV-2: their accuracy ranges between 82% and 86%, and sensitivity between 92% e 95%, so comparably well with respect to the gold standard. We also developed an interpretable Decision Tree model as a simple decision aid for clinician interpreting blood tests (even off-line) for COVID-19 suspect cases. This study demonstrated the feasibility and clinical soundness of using blood tests analysis and machine learning as an alternative to rRT-PCR for identifying COVID-19 positive patients. This is especially useful in those countries, like developing ones, suffering from shortages of rRT-PCR reagents and specialized laboratories. We made available a Web-based tool for clinical reference and evaluation (This tool is available at https://covid19-blood-ml.herokuapp.com/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7326624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73266242020-07-01 Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study Brinati, Davide Campagner, Andrea Ferrari, Davide Locatelli, Massimo Banfi, Giuseppe Cabitza, Federico J Med Syst Image & Signal Processing The COVID-19 pandemia due to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, in its first 4 months since its outbreak, has to date reached more than 200 countries worldwide with more than 2 million confirmed cases (probably a much higher number of infected), and almost 200,000 deaths. Amplification of viral RNA by (real time) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the current gold standard test for confirmation of infection, although it presents known shortcomings: long turnaround times (3-4 hours to generate results), potential shortage of reagents, false-negative rates as large as 15-20%, the need for certified laboratories, expensive equipment and trained personnel. Thus there is a need for alternative, faster, less expensive and more accessible tests. We developed two machine learning classification models using hematochemical values from routine blood exams (namely: white blood cells counts, and the platelets, CRP, AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, LDH plasma levels) drawn from 279 patients who, after being admitted to the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) emergency-room with COVID-19 symptoms, were screened with the rRT-PCR test performed on respiratory tract specimens. Of these patients, 177 resulted positive, whereas 102 received a negative response. We have developed two machine learning models, to discriminate between patients who are either positive or negative to the SARS-CoV-2: their accuracy ranges between 82% and 86%, and sensitivity between 92% e 95%, so comparably well with respect to the gold standard. We also developed an interpretable Decision Tree model as a simple decision aid for clinician interpreting blood tests (even off-line) for COVID-19 suspect cases. This study demonstrated the feasibility and clinical soundness of using blood tests analysis and machine learning as an alternative to rRT-PCR for identifying COVID-19 positive patients. This is especially useful in those countries, like developing ones, suffering from shortages of rRT-PCR reagents and specialized laboratories. We made available a Web-based tool for clinical reference and evaluation (This tool is available at https://covid19-blood-ml.herokuapp.com/). Springer US 2020-07-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7326624/ /pubmed/32607737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01597-4 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Image & Signal Processing
Brinati, Davide
Campagner, Andrea
Ferrari, Davide
Locatelli, Massimo
Banfi, Giuseppe
Cabitza, Federico
Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
title Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
title_full Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
title_short Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study
title_sort detection of covid-19 infection from routine blood exams with machine learning: a feasibility study
topic Image & Signal Processing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01597-4
work_keys_str_mv AT brinatidavide detectionofcovid19infectionfromroutinebloodexamswithmachinelearningafeasibilitystudy
AT campagnerandrea detectionofcovid19infectionfromroutinebloodexamswithmachinelearningafeasibilitystudy
AT ferraridavide detectionofcovid19infectionfromroutinebloodexamswithmachinelearningafeasibilitystudy
AT locatellimassimo detectionofcovid19infectionfromroutinebloodexamswithmachinelearningafeasibilitystudy
AT banfigiuseppe detectionofcovid19infectionfromroutinebloodexamswithmachinelearningafeasibilitystudy
AT cabitzafederico detectionofcovid19infectionfromroutinebloodexamswithmachinelearningafeasibilitystudy