A case-control study of computer navigation assisted resection of primary sacral chordoma above sacrum 3 level

BACKGROUND: The operation of sacral chordoma resection is difficult especial in the tumor above sacrum 3 level and the local recurrence rate was high. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of computer navigation aided technology in primary sacral chordoma resection above sacrum 3 level through a case-control study, which including perioperative safety, surgical margin, postoperative recurrence and function results. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 25 patients received initial computer-assisted resection of sacral chordoma above the level of sacrum 3 from 2009 to 2016 were analyzed; the patients underwent non-navigation assisted resection of tumor above the level of sacrum 3 in the same period were matched and 25 patients were selected randomly. There was no significant difference between these two groups in gender (P = 0.370), age (P = 0.554), tumor transverse diameter (P = 0.836). The average maximum diameter of tumor in navigation group was significant bigger than that in non-navigation group (P = 0.005). The intraoperative safety results, surgical margin, postoperative complications, recurrence rate and function were compared between these groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between navigation and non-navigation group in operative time (P = 0.105) and intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.537). There were 18 wide resections, 4 marginal resections and 3 intracapsular resections in navigation group; there were 6 wide resections, 12 marginal resections and 7 intracapsular resections in non-navigation group; the surgical margins of two groups were significant different (P = 0.003). There were 5 cases (20%) and 6 cases (24%) with wound complication in navigation group and non-navigation group (P = 0.733). The average follow-up was 49.6 (16–102) months in navigation group and 51.3 (12–110) months in non-navigation group. Three cases (12%) showed recurrence in navigation group and six cases showed recurrence (24%) in non-navigation group. The surgical margin was significantly related with tumor recurrence (P = 0.000). The average MSTS score was 27.3 (19–30) and 26.5 (20–29) in navigation group and non-navigation group (P = 0.374). CONCLUSION: The computer navigation aided technology can improve the accuracy of primary sacral chordoma resection, and make more cases achieve safe surgical margin. Compared with the traditional operation, the application of computer navigation in the larger tumor resection does not increase the operation time and intraoperative blood loss, which shows good safety.