Cargando…
Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting
BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional laparoscopy, robot assisted surgery is expected to have most potential in difficult areas and demanding technical skills like minimally invasive suturing. This study was performed to identify the differences in the learning curves of laparoscopic versus robot ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2 |
_version_ | 1783552423838613504 |
---|---|
author | Leijte, Erik de Blaauw, Ivo Van Workum, Frans Rosman, Camiel Botden, Sanne |
author_facet | Leijte, Erik de Blaauw, Ivo Van Workum, Frans Rosman, Camiel Botden, Sanne |
author_sort | Leijte, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional laparoscopy, robot assisted surgery is expected to have most potential in difficult areas and demanding technical skills like minimally invasive suturing. This study was performed to identify the differences in the learning curves of laparoscopic versus robot assisted suturing. METHOD: Novice participants performed three suturing tasks on the EoSim laparoscopic augmented reality simulator or the RobotiX robot assisted virtual reality simulator. Each participant performed an intracorporeal suturing task, a tilted plane needle transfer task and an anastomosis needle transfer task. To complete the learning curve, all tasks were repeated up to twenty repetitions or until a time plateau was reached. Clinically relevant and comparable parameters regarding time, movements and safety were recorded. Intracorporeal suturing time and cumulative sum analysis was used to compare the learning curves and phases. RESULTS: Seventeen participants completed the learning curve laparoscopically and 30 robot assisted. Median first knot suturing time was 611 s (s) for laparoscopic versus 251 s for robot assisted (p < 0.001), and this was 324 s versus 165 (sixth knot, p < 0.001) and 257 s and 149 s (eleventh knot, p < 0.001) respectively on base of the found learning phases. The percentage of ‘adequate surgical knots’ was higher in the laparoscopic than in the robot assisted group. First knot: 71% versus 60%, sixth knot: 100% versus 83%, and eleventh knot: 100% versus 73%. When assessing the ‘instrument out of view’ parameter, the robot assisted group scored a median of 0% after repetition four. In the laparoscopic group, the instrument out of view increased from 3.1 to 3.9% (left) and from 3.0 to 4.1% (right) between the first and eleventh knot (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The learning curve of minimally invasive suturing shows a shorter task time curve using robotic assistance compared to the laparoscopic curve. However, laparoscopic outcomes show good end results with rapid outcome improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7326898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73268982020-07-07 Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting Leijte, Erik de Blaauw, Ivo Van Workum, Frans Rosman, Camiel Botden, Sanne Surg Endosc 2019 EAES Oral BACKGROUND: Compared to conventional laparoscopy, robot assisted surgery is expected to have most potential in difficult areas and demanding technical skills like minimally invasive suturing. This study was performed to identify the differences in the learning curves of laparoscopic versus robot assisted suturing. METHOD: Novice participants performed three suturing tasks on the EoSim laparoscopic augmented reality simulator or the RobotiX robot assisted virtual reality simulator. Each participant performed an intracorporeal suturing task, a tilted plane needle transfer task and an anastomosis needle transfer task. To complete the learning curve, all tasks were repeated up to twenty repetitions or until a time plateau was reached. Clinically relevant and comparable parameters regarding time, movements and safety were recorded. Intracorporeal suturing time and cumulative sum analysis was used to compare the learning curves and phases. RESULTS: Seventeen participants completed the learning curve laparoscopically and 30 robot assisted. Median first knot suturing time was 611 s (s) for laparoscopic versus 251 s for robot assisted (p < 0.001), and this was 324 s versus 165 (sixth knot, p < 0.001) and 257 s and 149 s (eleventh knot, p < 0.001) respectively on base of the found learning phases. The percentage of ‘adequate surgical knots’ was higher in the laparoscopic than in the robot assisted group. First knot: 71% versus 60%, sixth knot: 100% versus 83%, and eleventh knot: 100% versus 73%. When assessing the ‘instrument out of view’ parameter, the robot assisted group scored a median of 0% after repetition four. In the laparoscopic group, the instrument out of view increased from 3.1 to 3.9% (left) and from 3.0 to 4.1% (right) between the first and eleventh knot (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The learning curve of minimally invasive suturing shows a shorter task time curve using robotic assistance compared to the laparoscopic curve. However, laparoscopic outcomes show good end results with rapid outcome improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-11-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7326898/ /pubmed/31754849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | 2019 EAES Oral Leijte, Erik de Blaauw, Ivo Van Workum, Frans Rosman, Camiel Botden, Sanne Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
title | Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
title_full | Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
title_fullStr | Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
title_short | Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
title_sort | robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting |
topic | 2019 EAES Oral |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31754849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leijteerik robotassistedversuslaparoscopicsuturinglearningcurveinasimulatedsetting AT deblaauwivo robotassistedversuslaparoscopicsuturinglearningcurveinasimulatedsetting AT vanworkumfrans robotassistedversuslaparoscopicsuturinglearningcurveinasimulatedsetting AT rosmancamiel robotassistedversuslaparoscopicsuturinglearningcurveinasimulatedsetting AT botdensanne robotassistedversuslaparoscopicsuturinglearningcurveinasimulatedsetting |