Cargando…
Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface
Plant organs including flowers and leaves typically have a variety of different micro-structures present on the epidermal surface. These structures can produce measurable optical effects with viewing angle including shifts in peak reflectance and intensity; however, these different structures can al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67663-6 |
_version_ | 1783552444853125120 |
---|---|
author | Garcia, Jair E. Shrestha, Mani Ospina-Rozo, Laura Dekiwadia, Chaitali Field, Matthew R. Ma, Ji Sheng Tran, Nhiem Dyer, Adrian G. Fox, Kate Greentree, Andrew D. |
author_facet | Garcia, Jair E. Shrestha, Mani Ospina-Rozo, Laura Dekiwadia, Chaitali Field, Matthew R. Ma, Ji Sheng Tran, Nhiem Dyer, Adrian G. Fox, Kate Greentree, Andrew D. |
author_sort | Garcia, Jair E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plant organs including flowers and leaves typically have a variety of different micro-structures present on the epidermal surface. These structures can produce measurable optical effects with viewing angle including shifts in peak reflectance and intensity; however, these different structures can also modulate hydrophobic properties of the surfaces. For some species optical effects have been proposed to act as signals to enhance pollination interactions, whilst the ability to efficiently shed water provides physiological advantages to plants in terms of gas exchange and reducing infections. Currently, little is known about epidermal surface structure of flowering plants in the Southern Hemisphere, and how micro-surface may be related with either hydrophobicity or visual signalling. We measured four Australian native species and two naturalised species using a combination of techniques including SEM imaging, spectral sampling with a goniometer and contact angle measurements. Spectral data were evaluated in relation to published psychophysics results for important pollinators and reveal that potential visual changes, where present, were unlikely to be perceived by relevant pollinators. Nevertheless, hydrophobicity also did not simply explain petal surfaces as similar structures could in some cases result in very different levels of water repellency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7326983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73269832020-07-01 Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface Garcia, Jair E. Shrestha, Mani Ospina-Rozo, Laura Dekiwadia, Chaitali Field, Matthew R. Ma, Ji Sheng Tran, Nhiem Dyer, Adrian G. Fox, Kate Greentree, Andrew D. Sci Rep Article Plant organs including flowers and leaves typically have a variety of different micro-structures present on the epidermal surface. These structures can produce measurable optical effects with viewing angle including shifts in peak reflectance and intensity; however, these different structures can also modulate hydrophobic properties of the surfaces. For some species optical effects have been proposed to act as signals to enhance pollination interactions, whilst the ability to efficiently shed water provides physiological advantages to plants in terms of gas exchange and reducing infections. Currently, little is known about epidermal surface structure of flowering plants in the Southern Hemisphere, and how micro-surface may be related with either hydrophobicity or visual signalling. We measured four Australian native species and two naturalised species using a combination of techniques including SEM imaging, spectral sampling with a goniometer and contact angle measurements. Spectral data were evaluated in relation to published psychophysics results for important pollinators and reveal that potential visual changes, where present, were unlikely to be perceived by relevant pollinators. Nevertheless, hydrophobicity also did not simply explain petal surfaces as similar structures could in some cases result in very different levels of water repellency. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7326983/ /pubmed/32606366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67663-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Garcia, Jair E. Shrestha, Mani Ospina-Rozo, Laura Dekiwadia, Chaitali Field, Matthew R. Ma, Ji Sheng Tran, Nhiem Dyer, Adrian G. Fox, Kate Greentree, Andrew D. Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
title | Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
title_full | Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
title_fullStr | Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
title_full_unstemmed | Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
title_short | Iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
title_sort | iridescence and hydrophobicity have no clear delineation that explains flower petal micro-surface |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7326983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67663-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciajaire iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT shresthamani iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT ospinarozolaura iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT dekiwadiachaitali iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT fieldmatthewr iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT majisheng iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT trannhiem iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT dyeradriang iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT foxkate iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface AT greentreeandrewd iridescenceandhydrophobicityhavenocleardelineationthatexplainsflowerpetalmicrosurface |