Cargando…

Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer

Genomics and transcriptomics have led to the widely-used molecular classification of breast cancer (BC). However, heterogeneous biological behaviors persist within breast cancer subtypes. Metabolomics is a rapidly-expanding field of study dedicated to cellular metabolisms affected by the environment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gal, Jocelyn, Bailleux, Caroline, Chardin, David, Pourcher, Thierry, Gilhodes, Julia, Jing, Lun, Guigonis, Jean-Marie, Ferrero, Jean-Marc, Milano, Gerard, Mograbi, Baharia, Brest, Patrick, Chateau, Yann, Humbert, Olivier, Chamorey, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.021
_version_ 1783552451858661376
author Gal, Jocelyn
Bailleux, Caroline
Chardin, David
Pourcher, Thierry
Gilhodes, Julia
Jing, Lun
Guigonis, Jean-Marie
Ferrero, Jean-Marc
Milano, Gerard
Mograbi, Baharia
Brest, Patrick
Chateau, Yann
Humbert, Olivier
Chamorey, Emmanuel
author_facet Gal, Jocelyn
Bailleux, Caroline
Chardin, David
Pourcher, Thierry
Gilhodes, Julia
Jing, Lun
Guigonis, Jean-Marie
Ferrero, Jean-Marc
Milano, Gerard
Mograbi, Baharia
Brest, Patrick
Chateau, Yann
Humbert, Olivier
Chamorey, Emmanuel
author_sort Gal, Jocelyn
collection PubMed
description Genomics and transcriptomics have led to the widely-used molecular classification of breast cancer (BC). However, heterogeneous biological behaviors persist within breast cancer subtypes. Metabolomics is a rapidly-expanding field of study dedicated to cellular metabolisms affected by the environment. The aim of this study was to compare metabolomic signatures of BC obtained by 5 different unsupervised machine learning (ML) methods. Fifty-two consecutive patients with BC with an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively included. We performed metabolomic profiling of tumor resection samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Here, four hundred and forty-nine identified metabolites were selected for further analysis. Clusters obtained using 5 unsupervised ML methods (PCA k-means, sparse k-means, spectral clustering, SIMLR and k-sparse) were compared in terms of clinical and biological characteristics. With an optimal partitioning parameter k = 3, the five methods identified three prognosis groups of patients (favorable, intermediate, unfavorable) with different clinical and biological profiles. SIMLR and K-sparse methods were the most effective techniques in terms of clustering. In-silico survival analysis revealed a significant difference for 5-year predicted OS between the 3 clusters. Further pathway analysis using the 449 selected metabolites showed significant differences in amino acid and glucose metabolism between BC histologic subtypes. Our results provide proof-of-concept for the use of unsupervised ML metabolomics enabling stratification and personalized management of BC patients. The design of novel computational methods incorporating ML and bioinformatics techniques should make available tools particularly suited to improving the outcome of cancer treatment and reducing cancer-related mortalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7327012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73270122020-07-06 Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer Gal, Jocelyn Bailleux, Caroline Chardin, David Pourcher, Thierry Gilhodes, Julia Jing, Lun Guigonis, Jean-Marie Ferrero, Jean-Marc Milano, Gerard Mograbi, Baharia Brest, Patrick Chateau, Yann Humbert, Olivier Chamorey, Emmanuel Comput Struct Biotechnol J Research Article Genomics and transcriptomics have led to the widely-used molecular classification of breast cancer (BC). However, heterogeneous biological behaviors persist within breast cancer subtypes. Metabolomics is a rapidly-expanding field of study dedicated to cellular metabolisms affected by the environment. The aim of this study was to compare metabolomic signatures of BC obtained by 5 different unsupervised machine learning (ML) methods. Fifty-two consecutive patients with BC with an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively included. We performed metabolomic profiling of tumor resection samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Here, four hundred and forty-nine identified metabolites were selected for further analysis. Clusters obtained using 5 unsupervised ML methods (PCA k-means, sparse k-means, spectral clustering, SIMLR and k-sparse) were compared in terms of clinical and biological characteristics. With an optimal partitioning parameter k = 3, the five methods identified three prognosis groups of patients (favorable, intermediate, unfavorable) with different clinical and biological profiles. SIMLR and K-sparse methods were the most effective techniques in terms of clustering. In-silico survival analysis revealed a significant difference for 5-year predicted OS between the 3 clusters. Further pathway analysis using the 449 selected metabolites showed significant differences in amino acid and glucose metabolism between BC histologic subtypes. Our results provide proof-of-concept for the use of unsupervised ML metabolomics enabling stratification and personalized management of BC patients. The design of novel computational methods incorporating ML and bioinformatics techniques should make available tools particularly suited to improving the outcome of cancer treatment and reducing cancer-related mortalities. Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7327012/ /pubmed/32637048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.021 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Gal, Jocelyn
Bailleux, Caroline
Chardin, David
Pourcher, Thierry
Gilhodes, Julia
Jing, Lun
Guigonis, Jean-Marie
Ferrero, Jean-Marc
Milano, Gerard
Mograbi, Baharia
Brest, Patrick
Chateau, Yann
Humbert, Olivier
Chamorey, Emmanuel
Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
title Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
title_full Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
title_short Comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
title_sort comparison of unsupervised machine-learning methods to identify metabolomic signatures in patients with localized breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32637048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.021
work_keys_str_mv AT galjocelyn comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT bailleuxcaroline comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT chardindavid comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT pourcherthierry comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT gilhodesjulia comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT jinglun comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT guigonisjeanmarie comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT ferrerojeanmarc comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT milanogerard comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT mograbibaharia comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT brestpatrick comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT chateauyann comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT humbertolivier comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer
AT chamoreyemmanuel comparisonofunsupervisedmachinelearningmethodstoidentifymetabolomicsignaturesinpatientswithlocalizedbreastcancer