Cargando…
“How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening
BACKGROUND: YouTube™ is the world’s second most popular website after Google on the Internet. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and content of information YouTube™ videos for patients seeking information about teeth whitening. METHODS: The keyword ‘teeth whitening’ was searched on YouT...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01172-w |
_version_ | 1783552547955408896 |
---|---|
author | Simsek, Huseyin Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmış Cetinkaya, Ebru Tural, Mubin Koseoglu, Murside Seda |
author_facet | Simsek, Huseyin Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmış Cetinkaya, Ebru Tural, Mubin Koseoglu, Murside Seda |
author_sort | Simsek, Huseyin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: YouTube™ is the world’s second most popular website after Google on the Internet. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and content of information YouTube™ videos for patients seeking information about teeth whitening. METHODS: The keyword ‘teeth whitening’ was searched on YouTube™. YouTube™ was filtered by the relevance, and the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. The included videos were analyzed for views, duration, time since video upload, likes/dislikes, number of comments, source, material types (dental, natural, and other). Also, video purpose was analyzed under nine categories (definition, material preparation, the procedure of application, material comparison, before/after comparison, symptoms, post-op experience, commercial, educational). Each video was classified according to the quality of information content as ‘good’, ‘moderate’, or ‘poor’. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Fischer’s Exact test and Spearman correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Most videos were uploaded by laypersons (60.0%). The definition of teeth whitening was the most commonly covered topic (74.0%), followed by the procedure of application (54.0%), and post-op experience (36.0%). Only 12% of videos were classified as having good information quality content, 53% moderate, and 35% were rated as poor information content. Poor-information content videos had a significantly higher number of viewing rates than the other groups (P = 0.002), besides the duration was significantly higher in poor-information content videos (P =0.002). There was a significant relationship between the quality of video information and material types (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: YouTube™ should not be used as a thoroughly reliable and accurate source for patient information about teeth whitening. More informative and reliable content YouTube™ videos about teeth whitening should be uploaded by professionals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7327459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73274592020-07-01 “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening Simsek, Huseyin Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmış Cetinkaya, Ebru Tural, Mubin Koseoglu, Murside Seda BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: YouTube™ is the world’s second most popular website after Google on the Internet. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and content of information YouTube™ videos for patients seeking information about teeth whitening. METHODS: The keyword ‘teeth whitening’ was searched on YouTube™. YouTube™ was filtered by the relevance, and the first 100 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. The included videos were analyzed for views, duration, time since video upload, likes/dislikes, number of comments, source, material types (dental, natural, and other). Also, video purpose was analyzed under nine categories (definition, material preparation, the procedure of application, material comparison, before/after comparison, symptoms, post-op experience, commercial, educational). Each video was classified according to the quality of information content as ‘good’, ‘moderate’, or ‘poor’. The Kruskal-Wallis test, Fischer’s Exact test and Spearman correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Most videos were uploaded by laypersons (60.0%). The definition of teeth whitening was the most commonly covered topic (74.0%), followed by the procedure of application (54.0%), and post-op experience (36.0%). Only 12% of videos were classified as having good information quality content, 53% moderate, and 35% were rated as poor information content. Poor-information content videos had a significantly higher number of viewing rates than the other groups (P = 0.002), besides the duration was significantly higher in poor-information content videos (P =0.002). There was a significant relationship between the quality of video information and material types (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: YouTube™ should not be used as a thoroughly reliable and accurate source for patient information about teeth whitening. More informative and reliable content YouTube™ videos about teeth whitening should be uploaded by professionals. BioMed Central 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7327459/ /pubmed/32611420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01172-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Simsek, Huseyin Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmış Cetinkaya, Ebru Tural, Mubin Koseoglu, Murside Seda “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
title | “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
title_full | “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
title_fullStr | “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
title_full_unstemmed | “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
title_short | “How I whiten my teeth”: YouTube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
title_sort | “how i whiten my teeth”: youtube™ as a patient information resource for teeth whitening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32611420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01172-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simsekhuseyin howiwhitenmyteethyoutubeasapatientinformationresourceforteethwhitening AT buyuksuleymankutalmıs howiwhitenmyteethyoutubeasapatientinformationresourceforteethwhitening AT cetinkayaebru howiwhitenmyteethyoutubeasapatientinformationresourceforteethwhitening AT turalmubin howiwhitenmyteethyoutubeasapatientinformationresourceforteethwhitening AT koseoglumursideseda howiwhitenmyteethyoutubeasapatientinformationresourceforteethwhitening |