Cargando…

Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls

IMPORTANCE: The magnitude and variability of cytokine alterations in depression are not clear. OBJECTIVE: To perform an up to date meta-analysis of mean differences of immune markers in depression, and to quantify and test for evidence of heterogeneity in immune markers in depression by conducting a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osimo, Emanuele F., Pillinger, Toby, Rodriguez, Irene Mateos, Khandaker, Golam M., Pariante, Carmine M., Howes, Oliver D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.02.010
_version_ 1783552560368451584
author Osimo, Emanuele F.
Pillinger, Toby
Rodriguez, Irene Mateos
Khandaker, Golam M.
Pariante, Carmine M.
Howes, Oliver D.
author_facet Osimo, Emanuele F.
Pillinger, Toby
Rodriguez, Irene Mateos
Khandaker, Golam M.
Pariante, Carmine M.
Howes, Oliver D.
author_sort Osimo, Emanuele F.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: The magnitude and variability of cytokine alterations in depression are not clear. OBJECTIVE: To perform an up to date meta-analysis of mean differences of immune markers in depression, and to quantify and test for evidence of heterogeneity in immune markers in depression by conducting a meta-analysis of variability to ascertain whether only a sub-group of patients with depression show evidence of inflammation. DATA SOURCES: Studies that reported immune marker levels in peripheral blood in patients with depression and matched healthy controls in the MEDLINE database from inception to August 29th 2018 were examined. STUDY SELECTION: Case-control studies that reported immune marker levels in peripheral blood in patients with depression and healthy controls were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Means and variances (SDs) were extracted for each measure to calculate effect sizes, which were combined using multivariate meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hedges g was used to quantify mean differences. Relative variability of immune marker measurements in patients compared with control groups as indexed by the coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). RESULTS: A total of 107 studies that reported measurements from 5,166 patients with depression and 5,083 controls were included in the analyses. Levels of CRP (g = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.50–0.92; p < 0.0001); IL-3 (g = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.31–0.89; p < 0.0001); IL-6 (g = 0.61; 95%CI: 0.39–0.82; p < 0.0001); IL-12 (g = 1.18; 95%CI: 0.74–1.62; p < 0.0001); IL-18 (g = 1.97; 95%CI: 1.00–2.95; p < 0.0001); sIL-2R (g = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.44–0.98; p < 0.0001); and TNFα (g = 0.54; 95%CI: 0.32–0.76; p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with depression. These findings were robust to a range of potential confounds and moderators. Mean-scaled variability, measured as CVR, was significantly lower in patients with depression for CRP (CVR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.75–0.98; p = 0.02); IL-12 (CVR = 0.61; 95%CI: 0.46–0.80; p < 0.01); and sIL-2R (CVR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.73–0.99; p = 0.04), while it was unchanged for IL-3, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF α. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Depression is confirmed as a pro-inflammatory state. Some of the inflammatory markers elevated in depression, including CRP and IL-12, show reduced variability in patients with depression, therefore supporting greater homogeneity in terms of an inflammatory phenotype in depression. Some inflammatory marker elevations in depression do not appear due to an inflamed sub-group, but rather to a right shift of the immune marker distribution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7327519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73275192020-07-06 Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls Osimo, Emanuele F. Pillinger, Toby Rodriguez, Irene Mateos Khandaker, Golam M. Pariante, Carmine M. Howes, Oliver D. Brain Behav Immun Article IMPORTANCE: The magnitude and variability of cytokine alterations in depression are not clear. OBJECTIVE: To perform an up to date meta-analysis of mean differences of immune markers in depression, and to quantify and test for evidence of heterogeneity in immune markers in depression by conducting a meta-analysis of variability to ascertain whether only a sub-group of patients with depression show evidence of inflammation. DATA SOURCES: Studies that reported immune marker levels in peripheral blood in patients with depression and matched healthy controls in the MEDLINE database from inception to August 29th 2018 were examined. STUDY SELECTION: Case-control studies that reported immune marker levels in peripheral blood in patients with depression and healthy controls were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Means and variances (SDs) were extracted for each measure to calculate effect sizes, which were combined using multivariate meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hedges g was used to quantify mean differences. Relative variability of immune marker measurements in patients compared with control groups as indexed by the coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). RESULTS: A total of 107 studies that reported measurements from 5,166 patients with depression and 5,083 controls were included in the analyses. Levels of CRP (g = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.50–0.92; p < 0.0001); IL-3 (g = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.31–0.89; p < 0.0001); IL-6 (g = 0.61; 95%CI: 0.39–0.82; p < 0.0001); IL-12 (g = 1.18; 95%CI: 0.74–1.62; p < 0.0001); IL-18 (g = 1.97; 95%CI: 1.00–2.95; p < 0.0001); sIL-2R (g = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.44–0.98; p < 0.0001); and TNFα (g = 0.54; 95%CI: 0.32–0.76; p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with depression. These findings were robust to a range of potential confounds and moderators. Mean-scaled variability, measured as CVR, was significantly lower in patients with depression for CRP (CVR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.75–0.98; p = 0.02); IL-12 (CVR = 0.61; 95%CI: 0.46–0.80; p < 0.01); and sIL-2R (CVR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.73–0.99; p = 0.04), while it was unchanged for IL-3, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF α. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Depression is confirmed as a pro-inflammatory state. Some of the inflammatory markers elevated in depression, including CRP and IL-12, show reduced variability in patients with depression, therefore supporting greater homogeneity in terms of an inflammatory phenotype in depression. Some inflammatory marker elevations in depression do not appear due to an inflamed sub-group, but rather to a right shift of the immune marker distribution. Elsevier 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7327519/ /pubmed/32113908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.02.010 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Osimo, Emanuele F.
Pillinger, Toby
Rodriguez, Irene Mateos
Khandaker, Golam M.
Pariante, Carmine M.
Howes, Oliver D.
Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
title Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
title_full Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
title_fullStr Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
title_full_unstemmed Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
title_short Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
title_sort inflammatory markers in depression: a meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5,166 patients and 5,083 controls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.02.010
work_keys_str_mv AT osimoemanuelef inflammatorymarkersindepressionametaanalysisofmeandifferencesandvariabilityin5166patientsand5083controls
AT pillingertoby inflammatorymarkersindepressionametaanalysisofmeandifferencesandvariabilityin5166patientsand5083controls
AT rodriguezirenemateos inflammatorymarkersindepressionametaanalysisofmeandifferencesandvariabilityin5166patientsand5083controls
AT khandakergolamm inflammatorymarkersindepressionametaanalysisofmeandifferencesandvariabilityin5166patientsand5083controls
AT pariantecarminem inflammatorymarkersindepressionametaanalysisofmeandifferencesandvariabilityin5166patientsand5083controls
AT howesoliverd inflammatorymarkersindepressionametaanalysisofmeandifferencesandvariabilityin5166patientsand5083controls