Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system has been increasingly utilized as a non-surgical option to endoscopically manage refractory gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage, perforations/luminal defects and fistulas. Limited data exist evaluating the efficacy and safety of OTSC. AIM: To determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartell, Nicholas, Bittner, Krystle, Kaul, Vivek, Kothari, Truptesh H, Kothari, Shivangi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3495
_version_ 1783552613666521088
author Bartell, Nicholas
Bittner, Krystle
Kaul, Vivek
Kothari, Truptesh H
Kothari, Shivangi
author_facet Bartell, Nicholas
Bittner, Krystle
Kaul, Vivek
Kothari, Truptesh H
Kothari, Shivangi
author_sort Bartell, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system has been increasingly utilized as a non-surgical option to endoscopically manage refractory gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage, perforations/luminal defects and fistulas. Limited data exist evaluating the efficacy and safety of OTSC. AIM: To determine the clinical success and adverse event (AE) rates of OTSC across all GI indications. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted for eligible articles describing the application of the OTSC system for any indication in the GI tract. Any article or case series reporting data for less than 5 total patients was excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical success. Secondary outcomes included: Technical success rate, OTSC-related AE rate and requirement for surgical intervention despite-OTSC placement. Pooled rates (per-indication and overall) were calculated as the number of patients with the event of interest divided by the total number of patients. RESULTS: A total of 85 articles met our inclusion criteria (n = 3025 patients). OTSC was successfully deployed in 94.4% of patients (n = 2856/3025). The overall rate of clinical success (all indications) was 78.4% (n = 2371/3025). Per-indication clinical success rates were as follows: (1) 86.0% (1120/1303) for GI hemorrhage; (2) 85.3% (399/468) for perforation; (3) 55.8% (347/622) for fistulae; (4) 72.6% (284/391) for anastomotic leaks; (5) 92.8% (205/221) for defect closure following endoscopic resection (e.g., following endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection); and (6) 80.0% (16/20) for stent fixation. AE’s related to the deployment of OTSC were only reported in 64 of 85 studies (n = 1942 patients), with an overall AE rate of 2.1% (n = 40/1942). Salvage surgical intervention was required in 4.7% of patients (n = 143/3025). CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that the OTSC system is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy to manage GI hemorrhage, perforations, anastomotic leaks, defects created by endoscopic resections and for stent fixation. Clinical success in fistula management appears limited. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials comparing OTSC with conventional and/or surgical therapies, are needed to determine which indication(s) are the most effective for its use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7327783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73277832020-07-09 Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review Bartell, Nicholas Bittner, Krystle Kaul, Vivek Kothari, Truptesh H Kothari, Shivangi World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system has been increasingly utilized as a non-surgical option to endoscopically manage refractory gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage, perforations/luminal defects and fistulas. Limited data exist evaluating the efficacy and safety of OTSC. AIM: To determine the clinical success and adverse event (AE) rates of OTSC across all GI indications. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted for eligible articles describing the application of the OTSC system for any indication in the GI tract. Any article or case series reporting data for less than 5 total patients was excluded. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical success. Secondary outcomes included: Technical success rate, OTSC-related AE rate and requirement for surgical intervention despite-OTSC placement. Pooled rates (per-indication and overall) were calculated as the number of patients with the event of interest divided by the total number of patients. RESULTS: A total of 85 articles met our inclusion criteria (n = 3025 patients). OTSC was successfully deployed in 94.4% of patients (n = 2856/3025). The overall rate of clinical success (all indications) was 78.4% (n = 2371/3025). Per-indication clinical success rates were as follows: (1) 86.0% (1120/1303) for GI hemorrhage; (2) 85.3% (399/468) for perforation; (3) 55.8% (347/622) for fistulae; (4) 72.6% (284/391) for anastomotic leaks; (5) 92.8% (205/221) for defect closure following endoscopic resection (e.g., following endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection); and (6) 80.0% (16/20) for stent fixation. AE’s related to the deployment of OTSC were only reported in 64 of 85 studies (n = 1942 patients), with an overall AE rate of 2.1% (n = 40/1942). Salvage surgical intervention was required in 4.7% of patients (n = 143/3025). CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that the OTSC system is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy to manage GI hemorrhage, perforations, anastomotic leaks, defects created by endoscopic resections and for stent fixation. Clinical success in fistula management appears limited. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials comparing OTSC with conventional and/or surgical therapies, are needed to determine which indication(s) are the most effective for its use. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-06-28 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7327783/ /pubmed/32655272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3495 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Bartell, Nicholas
Bittner, Krystle
Kaul, Vivek
Kothari, Truptesh H
Kothari, Shivangi
Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review
title Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review
title_full Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review
title_short Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review
title_sort clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7327783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3495
work_keys_str_mv AT bartellnicholas clinicalefficacyoftheoverthescopeclipdeviceasystematicreview
AT bittnerkrystle clinicalefficacyoftheoverthescopeclipdeviceasystematicreview
AT kaulvivek clinicalefficacyoftheoverthescopeclipdeviceasystematicreview
AT kotharitrupteshh clinicalefficacyoftheoverthescopeclipdeviceasystematicreview
AT kotharishivangi clinicalefficacyoftheoverthescopeclipdeviceasystematicreview