Cargando…

Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?

INTRODUCTION: Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Joseph A, Gibson, John A G, Nguyen, Dai Q
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749
_version_ 1783552731547435008
author Ward, Joseph A
Gibson, John A G
Nguyen, Dai Q
author_facet Ward, Joseph A
Gibson, John A G
Nguyen, Dai Q
author_sort Ward, Joseph A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service. METHODS: A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution’s designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008–2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, P=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, P=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, P=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73284812020-07-09 Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ? Ward, Joseph A Gibson, John A G Nguyen, Dai Q Scars Burn Heal Original Article INTRODUCTION: Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service. METHODS: A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution’s designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008–2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, P=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, P=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, P=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group. SAGE Publications 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7328481/ /pubmed/32655900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ward, Joseph A
Gibson, John A G
Nguyen, Dai Q
Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
title Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
title_full Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
title_fullStr Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
title_full_unstemmed Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
title_short Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
title_sort management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749
work_keys_str_mv AT wardjosepha managementofnecrotisingfasciitiswithinaburnscentredooutcomesdiffer
AT gibsonjohnag managementofnecrotisingfasciitiswithinaburnscentredooutcomesdiffer
AT nguyendaiq managementofnecrotisingfasciitiswithinaburnscentredooutcomesdiffer