Cargando…

Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a type five electronic monitoring system (EMS) for hand hygiene (HH) adherence with respect to accuracy and ability to avoid the Hawthorne effect. DESIGN: HH events were observed manually and electronically. The agreement between the two observation methods was evaluated. Con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gould, Dinah, Lindström, Håkan, Purssell, Edward, Wigglesworth, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177420907999
_version_ 1783552737339768832
author Gould, Dinah
Lindström, Håkan
Purssell, Edward
Wigglesworth, Neil
author_facet Gould, Dinah
Lindström, Håkan
Purssell, Edward
Wigglesworth, Neil
author_sort Gould, Dinah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a type five electronic monitoring system (EMS) for hand hygiene (HH) adherence with respect to accuracy and ability to avoid the Hawthorne effect. DESIGN: HH events were observed manually and electronically. The agreement between the two observation methods was evaluated. Continuous electronic measurement was made throughout the study. SETTING: An acute 31-bed medical ward in a National Health Service trust in London, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Staff working or attached to the ward. INTERVENTION: A newly developed type five EMS that can measure disinfectant dispenser usage as well as continuous movements of health workers throughout the ward with arm-length precision and analyse HH adherence was installed at the ward. RESULTS: A total of 294 HH events were observed in five sessions by an observer previously unknown to the ward. There was concordance between HH adherence assessed by manual observer and the EMS on 84% (79.1%–89.9%) of the occasions. During the five observation sessions, the observed HH adherence increased from 24% to 76% while the EMS measurements immediately before the arrival of the observer remained constant for all sessions. CONCLUSION: The 84% agreement between the EMS and the manual observation suggest a high level of precision for the evaluated system. The Hawthorne effect (higher rate of HH performance) was clearly seen in the increase by a factor of three in the manually observed adherence from session to session as the health workers became more aware of them being observed. The EMS was able to avoid the Hawthorne effect when the observer was not present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73285082021-07-01 Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency Gould, Dinah Lindström, Håkan Purssell, Edward Wigglesworth, Neil J Infect Prev Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a type five electronic monitoring system (EMS) for hand hygiene (HH) adherence with respect to accuracy and ability to avoid the Hawthorne effect. DESIGN: HH events were observed manually and electronically. The agreement between the two observation methods was evaluated. Continuous electronic measurement was made throughout the study. SETTING: An acute 31-bed medical ward in a National Health Service trust in London, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Staff working or attached to the ward. INTERVENTION: A newly developed type five EMS that can measure disinfectant dispenser usage as well as continuous movements of health workers throughout the ward with arm-length precision and analyse HH adherence was installed at the ward. RESULTS: A total of 294 HH events were observed in five sessions by an observer previously unknown to the ward. There was concordance between HH adherence assessed by manual observer and the EMS on 84% (79.1%–89.9%) of the occasions. During the five observation sessions, the observed HH adherence increased from 24% to 76% while the EMS measurements immediately before the arrival of the observer remained constant for all sessions. CONCLUSION: The 84% agreement between the EMS and the manual observation suggest a high level of precision for the evaluated system. The Hawthorne effect (higher rate of HH performance) was clearly seen in the increase by a factor of three in the manually observed adherence from session to session as the health workers became more aware of them being observed. The EMS was able to avoid the Hawthorne effect when the observer was not present. SAGE Publications 2020-05-28 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7328508/ /pubmed/32655694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177420907999 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gould, Dinah
Lindström, Håkan
Purssell, Edward
Wigglesworth, Neil
Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency
title Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency
title_full Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency
title_fullStr Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency
title_short Electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the Hawthorne effect and efficiency
title_sort electronic hand hygiene monitoring: accuracy, impact on the hawthorne effect and efficiency
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177420907999
work_keys_str_mv AT goulddinah electronichandhygienemonitoringaccuracyimpactonthehawthorneeffectandefficiency
AT lindstromhakan electronichandhygienemonitoringaccuracyimpactonthehawthorneeffectandefficiency
AT pursselledward electronichandhygienemonitoringaccuracyimpactonthehawthorneeffectandefficiency
AT wigglesworthneil electronichandhygienemonitoringaccuracyimpactonthehawthorneeffectandefficiency