Cargando…

Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid

BACKGROUND: About a third of patients undergoing haemodialysis have poorly controlled fluid status, which may affect survival. Clinical assessment is subjective and imprecise, which has led to the increasing use of devices based on bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). However, BIS cannot provide a simpl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stenberg, Jenny, Keane, David, Lindberg, Magnus, Furuland, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31682083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12304
_version_ 1783552781616939008
author Stenberg, Jenny
Keane, David
Lindberg, Magnus
Furuland, Hans
author_facet Stenberg, Jenny
Keane, David
Lindberg, Magnus
Furuland, Hans
author_sort Stenberg, Jenny
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: About a third of patients undergoing haemodialysis have poorly controlled fluid status, which may affect survival. Clinical assessment is subjective and imprecise, which has led to the increasing use of devices based on bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). However, BIS cannot provide a simple target applicable to all patients. Our aim was to develop and validate a decision aid combining clinical assessment of fluid status with information from BIS in target weight determination. METHODS: The decision aid was based on empirical experience and a literature review identifying physiological parameters already used in the clinical assessment of fluid status. Content validity was established by patient representatives, interdisciplinary stakeholders and external experts, who assessed item relevance and comprehensiveness. Reliability was assessed by inter‐rater agreement analysis between nurses assessing typical patient cases. RESULTS: The decision aid for Recognition and Correction of Volume Alterations (RECOVA) consists of three parts (1) a scoring system; (2) thresholds and triggers; (3) a decision aid algorithm. Agreement between raters in the assessment of symptoms was almost perfect, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.90. Agreement in clinical response was only fair, but increased to moderate, with training and self‐reported confidence. CONCLUSION: RECOVA may enable systematic clinical assessment of fluid status, facilitating early recognition of fluid alterations, and incorporation of bioimpedance into target weight management. However, implementation into clinical practice will require training of staff. Clinical intervention studies are required to evaluate if RECOVA facilitates response to and correction of recognised fluid alterations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73287112020-07-02 Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid Stenberg, Jenny Keane, David Lindberg, Magnus Furuland, Hans J Ren Care Original Research BACKGROUND: About a third of patients undergoing haemodialysis have poorly controlled fluid status, which may affect survival. Clinical assessment is subjective and imprecise, which has led to the increasing use of devices based on bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). However, BIS cannot provide a simple target applicable to all patients. Our aim was to develop and validate a decision aid combining clinical assessment of fluid status with information from BIS in target weight determination. METHODS: The decision aid was based on empirical experience and a literature review identifying physiological parameters already used in the clinical assessment of fluid status. Content validity was established by patient representatives, interdisciplinary stakeholders and external experts, who assessed item relevance and comprehensiveness. Reliability was assessed by inter‐rater agreement analysis between nurses assessing typical patient cases. RESULTS: The decision aid for Recognition and Correction of Volume Alterations (RECOVA) consists of three parts (1) a scoring system; (2) thresholds and triggers; (3) a decision aid algorithm. Agreement between raters in the assessment of symptoms was almost perfect, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.90. Agreement in clinical response was only fair, but increased to moderate, with training and self‐reported confidence. CONCLUSION: RECOVA may enable systematic clinical assessment of fluid status, facilitating early recognition of fluid alterations, and incorporation of bioimpedance into target weight management. However, implementation into clinical practice will require training of staff. Clinical intervention studies are required to evaluate if RECOVA facilitates response to and correction of recognised fluid alterations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-04 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7328711/ /pubmed/31682083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12304 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Renal Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Dialysis & Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Stenberg, Jenny
Keane, David
Lindberg, Magnus
Furuland, Hans
Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid
title Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid
title_full Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid
title_fullStr Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid
title_short Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid
title_sort systematic fluid assessment in haemodialysis: development and validation of a decision aid
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31682083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12304
work_keys_str_mv AT stenbergjenny systematicfluidassessmentinhaemodialysisdevelopmentandvalidationofadecisionaid
AT keanedavid systematicfluidassessmentinhaemodialysisdevelopmentandvalidationofadecisionaid
AT lindbergmagnus systematicfluidassessmentinhaemodialysisdevelopmentandvalidationofadecisionaid
AT furulandhans systematicfluidassessmentinhaemodialysisdevelopmentandvalidationofadecisionaid